Once a month, I receive a report from Atomz detailing which words
and phrases folks have entered into this site's search engine. A pretty
sizable plurality of the queries involve movies that have recently opened
commercially about which I wrote briefly at some festival months or even
years earlier. Rather than make y'all dig, I'll just start compiling
these blurbs here, except in cases where I wind up properly reviewing the
film for nerve.com (and no doubt recycling what I'd written at Cannes or
Toronto anyway). Am I a sweetheart or what? Don't answer that,
ex-girlfriends.
NOTE: Most of these blurbs will be mixed or negative, simply because I'll volunteer to review films I actually like. They are presented in reverse chronological order by the date of their release in New York City.
I Love Your Work (Adam Goldberg, USA): 51 (Toronto 03)
[Scattershot perils-of-celebrity satire scores some great lines (dialogue,
not coke) but stumbles badly when Goldberg tries to push his flimsy
material into darker territory. Ribisi, who I generally like, is badly
miscast; likewise Potente. Best opening title card of the year.]
Gilles' Wife (Frédéric Fonteyne,
Belgium/France/Luxembourg/Italy/Switzerland): 54 (Toronto 04)
[Exquisite filmmaking in the service of a banal tale of romantic
martyrdom -- imagine an early silent melodrama reconceived in the syntax
of Late Modern Eurorigor. Emmanuelle Devos, with her penetrating eyes and
her jagged wound of a mouth, does a heroic job of conveying the title
character's interior monologue (the film was adapted from a novel, though
you wouldn't necessarily guess that) entirely via minute facial
adjustments, but it still felt to me as if something vital wound up lost
in translation. Confirms Fonteyne as a major talent, though.]
Private (Saverio Costanzo, Italy): 48 (Toronto 04)
[Blunt, hamhanded metaphor -- Occupation as a House, Stults
quipped -- but it's still kind of potent, perhaps simply because it's so
direct. Unfortunately, the inherently gripping scenario and a host of
strong performances wind up undermined by laughably on-the-nose dialogue
("Why don't you just leave this house?" "Why should I? It is my house.
Why don't you leave this house?"), egregious shaky-cam
videography, and a climactic, pseudo-Aesopian burst of Roger Waters circa
1992. At least Bellocchio knew enough to use instrumental Floyd.] [ADDENDUM 11/05: Ironically, Private and Good
Morning, Night, which were made in separate years, wound up being
released in NYC on consecutive weeks.]
Land of Plenty (Wim Wenders, USA): 48 (Toronto 04)
[Not sure why I kind of liked this, but I kind of did, despite the lowish
rating. It's a silly and somewhat motononous film, shot in grimy DV, but
it taps into post-9/11 anxiety in a way that's at once comforting and
distressing, and John Diehl stubbornly refuses to let his wacked-out
character devolve into caricature, even as he's the butt of some pretty
good jokes. Or maybe it just looks good compared to The End of
Violence and The Million Dollar Hotel.]
Dandelion (Mark Milgard, USA): W/O (Rotterdam 04)
[Let's see, how can we stack the deck against our sensitive young
protagonist, who looks like he just wandered out of Elephant High and is
first seen delicately putting the barrel of a pistol into his mouth?
First, we'll saddle him with an overbearing, disapproving father; a
passive, pill-popping mother; and a crazy uncle who fears that the boy
will be killed fighting in Vietnam. (The film is set in the present.)
Then we'll show him perform a mercy killing on a wounded bird. Then his
asshole dad will allow him to take the fall for the old man's hit-and-run,
because presumably a two-year juvie term means nothing compared to pop's
campaign for...city council. "TWO YEARS LATER," read the intertitle, and I
had to disagree. It had already felt like at least five.]
Novo (Jean-Pierre Limosin, France/Spain/Switzerland):
30 (Toronto 02)
[Memento reconceived as a bad French art movie -- protagonist
passive rather than active, emphasis on sex rather than revenge. Give
Limosin credit for successfully disguising the material's essential
ludicrousness until late in the going. What was the deal with the tooth,
though? Dopey symbolism? Obscure plot point? Please advise.]
Sympathy for Mr. Vengeance (Park Chan-Wook, South
Korea): 33 (Toronto 02)
[Devoid of sympathy, empathy and ultimately even curiosity, I wound up
observing each fresh act of violence or torture with the cold, impatient
stare of a customer at the butcher shop. Give me the glossy, pat morality
play of Joint Security Area over this
random nihilism any day.]
Balzac and the Little Chinese Seamstress (Dai Sijie,
France): 40 (Cannes 02)
[Blatant, ungainly tale of covert intellectual shenanigans in one of Mao's
re-education camps, theoretically buttressed by a tepid love triangle the
combined angles of which add up to 155 degrees tops. Xun Zhou (of
Suzhou River fame) singlehandedly saves the picture from outright
wretchedness with her impish joie de vivre...and, okay, her succession of
skimpy swimming costumes. Paean to Western lit frequently verges on the
hilarious -- apparently even the water buffalo smell different the morning
after you first experience The Red and the Black. Good to know.]
Memories of Murder (Bong Joon-ho, South Korea):
61 (Toronto 03)
[Kind of a relief to eventually discover that Bong means to examine the
genesis of police brutality rather than advocate its employment, but my
addled brain failed to keep pace with the fabled S. Korean tonal shifts,
especially when Goofus is juxtaposed not with Gallant but with Grim (or
Grimm). Ends strongly, which helps.]
Tropical Malady (Apichatpong Weerasethakul,
France/Thailand): 85 (Cannes 04)
[Opinion seems divided about whether this exquisitely uncanny gay romance
tells one linear, simple-yet-oblique story, switching rhetorical gears at
the midpoint, or whether its mythic second half to some extent
recapitulates its mundane first. Both positions have merit -- though I
found a number of apparent rhymes on second viewing supporting the latter
-- but more compelling than either, to my mind, is the film's implicit
suggestion that no amount of artful, naturalistic observation can possibly
convey the atavistic turmoil lurking within the human heart. Unexpected
though the rupture may be, it arrives precisely at the moment when
conventional representation, however inventive, precise and assured,
starts to feel painfully inadequate. The jungle adventure that follows --
beautiful, mysterious, savage, tentative, spontaneous, unforgettable --
deserves a less hackneyed and misleading phrase than "pure cinema," but
somebody else will have to come up with the neologism. I'm already a week
behind.]
Undead (The Spierig Brothers, Australia): 46 (Toronto 03)
[Genially inept low-budget zombie flick boasts a handful of awesome
moments, most notably an actor named Mungo (as a brooding loner named
Marion -- a nod to John Wayne?) punching a school of killer flying fish.
Not the greatest sendoff for the late, lamented Uptown 1.]
The World (Jia Zhangke, China): 58 (NYFF 04)
[Yet another portrait of aimless, disaffected Chinese youth unsure of
their place in the new global economy, but spiced up this time with a
truly inspired conceit, the film's theme-park setting providing a
winningly absurd counterpoint to the characters' moping and flailing.
Jia's use of offscreen space, always masterful, suddenly becomes even more
poignant and hilarious, e.g. a slow pan reveals that the person who
wandered out of frame a moment ago is now standing in ancient Egypt, the
Great Pyramids sort-of-towering over his own forlorn frame. More energetic
than Jia's last two films, too (my favorite, in a walk, remains his funky
debut, Xiao Wu); the animated interludes don't really add much but
were welcome nonetheless, just 'cause they shook things up a bit and boy
does Jia need that. Demerits: way overlong, sometimes heavy-handed (the
scenes with the Russian woman; "I don't even know anybody who's ever been
on a plane"); kneejerk downbeat conclusion. But this still seems like a
step in the right direction.]
Joint Security Area (JSA) (Park Chan-wook, South Korea):
67 (Berlin 01)
[Slick but satisfying, Park's DMZ drama -- reportedly the
highest-grossing movie in South Korean history -- feels uncannily like
Hollywood fare in terms of its tone, narrative structure, visual schema,
etc. Also in terms of good old-fashioned star power: One of the lead
roles is played by the Foul King himself, Song Kang-ho, and seeing those
two movies virtually back-to-back confirms that he's an actor of
tremendous range and bottomless charisma; JSA (as it's apparently
known back home) is worth checking out for his performance alone. The
Rules of Engagement-style military inquiry material doesn't really
work, and the movie as a whole is neither profound nor especially
probing, but its dream of rapprochement (think A Midnight Clear)
is quite touching, and at no point during its two hours was I even
remotely bored.]
5 x 2 -- Cinq Fois Deux (François Ozon, France):
47 (Toronto 04)
[Apologies to those who assumed I'd automatically flip for the backwards
movie, but I'm afraid I can't get behind Prick Cowardly a Married
I. Jane Campion employed roughly the same structural conceit in
Two Friends with considerably more skill and nuance, and while I
(shamefully) haven't yet seen any version of Pinter's Betrayal,
I'll make a blind wager that it's far superior as well. Certainly it
can't be this pathetically one-sided, although Ozon's belated, contrived
attempt to balance the scales in the fourth segment is arguably more
risible than the deck-stacking that precedes it (and both are even more
annoying than the mixed metaphor you just had to reread twice in order to
parse). Not to mention that Ozon has somehow managed to locate the only
bad actor in France, who comes across like Bruce Greenwood on meds. A few
sharply observed moments here and there deserved a more discerning
context. Finally, do not on any account listen to Theo, whose admiration
for the film is largely predicated on an exquisite and revelatory final
scene that, when pressed, he admits doesn't actually exist.]
High Tension (Alexandre Aja, France): 46 (Rotterdam 04)
[Dutch subtitles again, but I have no qualms about giving a rating this
time since (a) I understand French well enough to follow stuff like
"Dormez bien" and "Qu'est-ce que vous avez regarder, Jimmy?" and (b) 90%
of the movie is dialogue-free in any case. On the other hand, I do
have qualms about assigning it this particular rating, since what
we have here is a perfectly solid slasher flick -- nicely atmospheric,
occasionally witty, constantly gripping, properly gruesome -- that winds
up hamstrung by the single most retarded plot twist of all time. All
through the movie I kept thinking "Why did the folks at TIFF not dig
this?" and then it ended and I was all: Oh. Imagine a terrific
rollercoaster ride that ends with the car pulling into the station and
a bucket of pig vomit being dumped onto your head. Did you have a good
time? You see my dilemma.]
Sequins (Eléonore Faucher, France): W/O (Toronto 04)
[The alternate English title is A Common Thread. The scenario
concerns a pregnant teenager and a grieving middle-aged woman who form a
tentative bond while working together as seamstresses. Need I
continue?]
Mysterious Skin (Gregg Araki, USA): 47 (Toronto 04)
[Nice to see Araki maturing a little without abandoning his trangressive
instincts, but this is still a fairly banal therapeutic exercise,
building very very slowly to a revelation that's been painfully obvious
since the end of reel one. Fearless, riveting work by Joseph
Gordon-Levitt confirms him (following the little-seen Manic) as
one of the best actors of his generation.]
A tout de suite (Benoît Jacquot, France): 50 (Cannes 04)
[Never would have guessed this was Jacquot, apart from its sympathetic
but semi-detached observation of a young woman in distress. Here he
shoots in grainy b&w (video? super-8? I was never quite sure) and employs
a more jagged style than has been his custom -- not inappropriate, I
guess, given this film's fairly conventional lovers-on-the-lam scenario.
All too obviously based on someone's actual experience, with all the
advantages (emotional specificity) and weaknesses (dramatic
shapelessness) that implies; Isild Le Besco's fiery temperament serves her
character well early on, but she overplays the catatonia in the second
half, and the film kind of flatlines with her.]
Eros (Wong Kar Wai, Hong Kong/China; Steven Soderbergh,
USA; Michelangelo Antonioni, France/Italy/Luxembourg): 54 (Toronto 04)
[One out of three is about par for the international omnibus extravaganza,
I suppose. Wong's contribution revels in the same soporifically gorgeous
romanticism as 2046, substituting Chang Chen for Tony Leung but
retaining Gong Li, Peer Raben, the 60s and a vague air of tragic languor.
Antonioni populates various imposing locations with vacuous
mannequins, who prance around naked and exchange risible dialogue as
symbolic wild horses thunder past. Only Soderbergh delivers, though his
brief comic sketch, featuring wonderfully garrulous work from Robert
Downey Jr. and a symphony of furtive lechery from Alan Arkin, doesn't
exactly qualify as erotic. And it's smack in the middle, too, so I'm
afraid you can neither split super-early nor arrive very late.]
The Friend (Elmar Fischer, Germany): 61 (Rotterdam 04)
[Easily the best 9/11 movie to date, though most of its strengths are
only tangentially related to the terrorism angle. In a way, it's a male
version of Ghost World, with Enid's bus bound for an Al Qaeda
training camp; not nearly as glib or offensive as that sounds, though,
and Fischer wisely downplays the more sensationalist aspects of his
inherently compelling story, letting his actors create characters rather
than symbols. Too clumsy to recommend without reservation -- the flashback
structure, in particular, is more hindrance than help -- but also too
assured and subtly resonant to ignore.]
A hole in my heart (Lukas Moodysson, Sweden/Denmark):
46 (Toronto 04)
[A porn flick shot in my living room. A surgical needle in my labia. A
sadistic bald dude vomiting in my mouth. A metal baseball bat in my
personal space. A stiletto driven deep in my morose Goth-inflected
childhood innocence. A fat pimply ass in my field of vision. A churning
in my gut. An entry in my official Fox Searchlight notepad: "pathetic and
repulsive not inherently more truthful than [unreadable]." An uncertainty
in my response to an unexpectedly gentle, playful conclusion.]
Kontroll (Nimrod Antal, Hungary): W/O (Cannes 04)
[Painfully unfunny comedy-thriller about a group of allegedly lovable
losers working as conductors in the Budapest subway system. With its
forced banter, nonstop mugging and endless chase sequences set to bad
techno, it resembles nothing so much as an attempt to go Hollywood made
by someone who grew up watching TV broadcasts of Running
Scared.] [Addendum: I now discover that Antal was
actually born and raised in the U.S. This explains a lot.]
Look at Me (Agnès Jaoui,
France): 51 (Cannes 04)
[Struggled with the rating on this one, because it's obviously a "good"
film -- intelligent, literate, beautifully acted, nicely observed,
chockablock with piercing bons mots and credible human idiosyncrasies --
and yet I watched the entire thing in a semi-attentive, fidgety stupor.
In part this may have something to do with the dynamic being too blunt
and constricted, particularly w/r/t the toxic relationship between dumpy,
neurotic fille and monstrously insensitive père; in part it may
involve my general lack of interest in the self-esteem issues of the
French bourgeoisie. Mostly, though, I felt certain that I wouldn't
remember much of anything about this movie even just a few months later.
And I was right. I don't.]
Mondovino (Jonathan Nossiter,
USA/Argentina/Italy/France): 43 (Cannes
04)
[More than you probably really wanted to know about the wine industry's
movers and shakers, though those with a palette more refined than my own
may thrill to Nossiter's endless interviews with high-priced consultants,
recalcitrant French traditionalists, laid-back Napa Valley nouveau-snob
entrepreneurs, pompous Italian aristocrats, and cute little doggies.
(Well, he doesn't actually interview the dogs, but he sure seems obsessed
by them.) Still, I really think this is mediocre filmmaking:
self-indulgent, fatally disorganized, and repeatedly undercut by juvenile
editorial inserts, like the weird repeated shots of one California
family's automatic swimming-pool cleaner. And what's with all the
gratuitous zooming, often in mid-sentence? Sip some overpriced Mondavi and
calm the fuck down.]
Buffalo Boy (Minh Nguyen-Vô,
France/Belgium/Vietnam): W/O (Toronto
04)
[Basically the Vietnamese equivalent of a cattle-drive picture -- not
Red River, but one of those mundane, forgotten oaters that crop up
on AMC around 4am. Often quite beautiful, but that's about it. Spooky
flute score calls to mind various Japanese classics, which doesn't
help.]
Millions (Danny Boyle, UK/USA): 56 (Toronto 04)
[Consistently cute, intermittently clever. Dopey subplot about the bad ol'
robber trying to regain his booty will appeal to kids, I suppose.]
Sexual Dependency (Rodrigo Bellott, Bolivia/USA): W/O (Toronto 03)
[If I wanted to see people speaking Spanish in pointless, distracting
split-screen, I'd watch Mike Figgis movies on Telemundo.]
10 on Ten (Abbas Kiarostami, Iran): 4 (Cannes 04)
[What could be more exciting than a movie composed entirely of two fixed
camera angles in a moving vehicle, focused on a series of conversations
between driver and passenger? How about a movie composed almost entirely
of one fixed camera angle in a moving vehicle, focused on the driver as he
recites the most tedious director's-commentary track ever recorded? For
that's all this "movie" is: Kiarostami driving endlessly around the
location where Taste of Cherry was filmed, imparting scholarly
lessons about the miracle of the digital video camera (people behave so
naturally in its presence!), the superiority of non-professional actors
(they don't act! they just be themselves!), and -- my personal favorite --
the inherent intrusiveness of non-diagetic music, intended only to
manipulate the viewer's emotions...which is why, AK explains with a
straight face, he uses music only at the very end of his films, as a
means of signalling the audience that the picture is almost over. (I am
not making this up.) Not everything he says is that resoundingly inane,
but most of it is repetitive, banal and completely devoid of wit or
insight...and all the while, save for a few interpolated clips from
Ten (which suddenly looks riveting in this context), we've got
nothing to look at but a middle-aged man steering and talking. That a
major film festival would consider this worthy of attention is appalling;
that other critics continue to pretend that Emperor Abbas is stylin', just
plain sad.]
Bad Guy (Kim Ki-duk, South Korea): 58 (Toronto 02)
[Hideously misogynistic -- but then, so is The Piano, which tells
basically the same story but tarts it up with "respectable" neo-Gothic
atmosphere. This version's more honest.]
Cinévardaphoto (Agnès Varda, France): 61 (Toronto 04)
[Two keepers and a clunker. The newest film, about an exhibition of
photographs that feature teddy bears, is simply marvelous, both as an
exploration of the project itself (which is way more complicated and even
profound than you'd guess from a mere description) and as yet another
portrait of the workings of Varda's witty, humane, endlessly inquisitive
mind. A 1982 short about one of Varda's photographs from the 1950s,
recollected by its subjects decades later, works very nicely as an
embryonic treatise on similar ideas. But the earliest film, a
kaleidoscopic montage of images from a 1963 trip to Cuba, is little more
than filler, lacking the philosophical reflections and playful verve of
Varda's later work. Still, I adore this woman.]
My Mother's Smile (Marco Bellocchio, Italy): 45 (Cannes 02)
[Provocative premise -- committed atheist learns his late mother's being
considered for canonization -- proves to be merely the framework for one
of those coyly allusive, maddeningly indulgent journeys of self-discovery
so inexplicably beloved by Italian auteurs. (See also most of Fellini,
Rosi, et al.) And could somebody over near the stereo turn down the
oppressively rapturous score at the next opportunity? Grazie. Seeing it
did confirm, however, that Sergio Castellitto may be the most underrated
thesp alive; his physical reaction to a compliment from his son's religion
teacher -- a complicated repositioning of his upper torso that somehow
clearly suggests "You're altogether too kind and also kind of hot I just
realized" -- is in the running for the fest's single finest moment.]
Nobody Knows (Hirokazu Kore-eda, Japan): 48 (Cannes 04)
[Actually, if anybody does know why Kore-eda felt this
ripped-from-the-tabloids melodrama, about a family of small children
abandoned by their terminally flaky sitcom mother, needed to be
approximately 17 hours long, I'd appreciate a précis of his
reasoning. First hour or so unfolds with well-judged deliberation and is
impressively detailed in its depiction of the kids' hermetic universe --
in fact, with the exception of a handful of unfortunate musical cues, I
can't really think offhand of any specific missteps anywhere. It's only
in the second hour (and 20 minutes) that you start to realize that the
film has never once budged from the slightly maudlin rut it carved midway
through the opening reel. I know it's terribly jejune to say that a film
is too long, but seriously, this movie is just way the hell too long. In
the end, the thing just ground me down, eroding my goodwill. Pity.]
Fear X (Nicolas Winding Refn, Denmark/UK/Canada): 12 (Rotterdam 03)
[Where X = stilted dialogue; canned portentousness; endless footage from
surveillance cameras for that sub-Egoyan effect; blood-red hotel corridors
for that sub-Lynch effect; Turturro on autopilot; James Remar under the
impression that he should look 5% more stricken in each consecutive shot;
dumbass "all in his mind" plot twist (shut up, you should thank me
for spoiling it); "also starring Deborah Kara Unger." Note to cbf: No sign
of Kim Bodnia, you're off the hook.]
The Green Butchers (Anders Thomas Jensen, Denmark):
W/O (Toronto 03)
[Attend the tale of ATJ/His wit was pale and his plot cliché/He
switched to camera from his pen/And never thereafter was heard of
again...]