In the midst of a Slashdot discussion on something else:
science.slashdot.org
[http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/01/09/2330251]
I found the following good atheist one-liners; especially
good when you encounter Jesuits, who are actually taught
that they can make a nonsensical argument if it brings
people closer to Christ:
Yes, atheism is a religion in exactly the same way that not
collecting stamps is a hobby.
Of all the thousands of gods out there, we only disagree about
the existence of one of them!
Name exactly ONE article of faith of atheism – or is not
believing that there is an invisible rhinoceros in my living
room an "article of faith"?
Test page for quotes bug
This is just a test page – ignore
This is a quote
at the font pf the para
This is a quote: in the middle
of the para
Here are some paras entirely in a single pair of quotes:
This is para 1
This is para 2
This is para 3
This is not in quotes.
khmer440.com has deleted my account twice
I've often read the postings on the khmer440 website because
they do have some people posting who have interesting things
to say.
However, not only is the signal-to-noise ratio lower than
Usenet pre-spam, but also many of the posts are extremely
aggressive, such as the posts by "hanky" and others in the
following thread:
www.khmer440.com
[http://www.khmer440.com/chat_forum/viewtopic.php?t=3951&highlight=]
When I announced my phonetic font for Khmer PKD I decided to
post about it on khmer440, but the only responses were foolish:
www.khmer440.com
[http://www.khmer440.com/chat_forum/viewtopic.php?t=2454]
User "Doctor Seuss" apparently speaks Khmer, but he reads
a word transcribed in PKD and displayed using a normal font
as "jOG" and complains that it should be "jong". He clearly
does not understand *anything* about phonetic alphabets. Or
does he? Isn't he just picking on an error which is not in
fact an error in order to be irritating?
Well, I decided there were a lot of nasty and/or stupid
people on k440.
For a long time I didn't post much. But one thing was
bothering me about the way my posts were displayed.
khmer440 uses what appears to be stock phpbb software, although
they may have hand-rolled a few things. In particular, it
displays a "slogan" next to the user's name in each post which
is chosen by the admin, not by the user, based on number of
posts. For reasons best known to himself, the admin decided
to give low posters like me the slogan "I've got nothing
better to do". (Wouldn't that slogan fit *high* posters
better?)
Well, this rankled with me, so I grumbled about it, and got
flamed. As I read the responses (some of which I think have since
been deleted), I started to wonder what exactly was going on
at k440. It occurred to me that it was like "Fight Club",
the movie in which callow guys inexplicably gather to beat each
other to pulp. I started to make a post about this and
inadvertently posted a threatening quote from one of those pugnacious
pugilists on "Fight Club" without giving it an attribution.
And then it hit me: k440 is actually *run by* trolls. It
is the only site like it I know where the admins actually
support the trolls and delete their victims. The only trolls
they do react against are those that flame k440 and
their buddies.
So I logged off and went to bed ("don't feed the trolls"). The
next time I tried to log in my password didn't work. It transpired
my account had been disabled by the admin: no warning, no
private msgs, no previous warnings, not informed by email,
not a thing. When I checked the thread I had been called
a troll myself – for *one post*.
Here's the thread (until they lock it or delete more msgs I
suppose):
www.khmer440.com
[http://www.khmer440.com/chat_forum/viewtopic.php?t=3536]
When I posted *one* more msg with a new account the new
account was disabled a few days later (since yesterday)
and both dannyw and dannyw2 were deleted (so my posts now
are shown as "guest"). Again, no warnings or notification,
and this time the Admin didn't even mention it.
It's really a pity that the most active expat forum for
Cambodia is run by trolls. I would start a competing bb
but I'm afraid it would be attacked by the trolls who live
under k440.
A researcher has same idea as me about sleep paralysis
Back in June I made various speculations about the phenomenon
of sleep paralysis:
www.panix.com
[http://www.panix.com/~dannyw/weblog/Asia/Cambodia/Miscellaneous/nightcrusher01.html]
One of them was that there could be some sort of link with the
experiences of those who remember being abducted by aliens.
Now the Guardian reports that a researcher has suggested the same
thing:
education.guardian.co.uk
[http://education.guardian.co.uk/higher/news/story/0,9830,1600781,00.html]
The account in the Guardian lacks the wit and insight of my own
posting of course. In particular, the researchers seem to leadenly
concentrate on pathology, mentioning that the abductees "already had
an interest in the paranormal" as if that were enough to make you
fantasize a transdimensional rectal probe.
When oil runs out, we'll have alternative energy but not plastics
As I have grumbled before, essentially none of the new inventions
I expected to see before I died have happened yet. No flying cars;
not even a gas-turbine car, let alone nuclear-powered.
The other day I was looking at some small gadget, perhaps a
ballpoint, and musing that one thing that actually has
improved in the last fifty years is plastics. "There's a great
future in plastics." A lot of plastic parts used to scuff, or
get brittle, or haze over, or never quite matched up, or peeled
off... These days, if you don't buy things made in Vietnam,
the plastic is usually very satisfactory. (Although my mother
bought melamine plates fifty years ago that still looked good
ten years ago, and they're impossible to find now: I guess the
manufacturers realized that they make more money if plates
break and chip within three years of purchase.)
Then it occurred to me that if oil really *is* running out (ie,
if the theory the oil companies have struggled to force on the
scientific community about oil deposits being extremely rare
is not disproven), we do have a wide range of alternative
*energy* sources, but not of high-quality *hydrocarbons* which
could fit into current manufacturing processes.
Boingboing.net, and a friend wants you to read her novel
Years ago I had a girlfriend who was a good guitarist and songwriter.
I was happy that i could honestly tell her that I liked her stuff – in fact
I still have several of her songs on CD that I listened to as recently
as last month. Despite this, it was always nervewracking when she
wanted me to listen to a new song. What could I say if I didn't like it?
I know nothing about music – I couldn't say "it'll be great if you
just add a key change in the break!!" or something – but sap that
I am I find it difficult to actually dissemble, especially to somebody
I care about.
At the time a point occurred to me which I tried and failed to express
to her. It probably sounded specious. What I tried to say was that
out of all the sf books in the store, I reject 50% on the cover, and
of the remainder I reject more than 90% on a cursory flip through.
Of those that I actually buy (which depends on how much money I
have at the time of course) the majority – probably 70% – were
not worth reading. Of those that I enjoyed at all, probably only
one in ten were the actual reason why I read sf. So what does
all that add up to? Out of *published* sf I feel enthusiastic about
perhaps one in 2000 books.
And I don't think I'm out of the ordinary. A successful hardback
sells perhaps 100,000 copies in the US with a regular reading population
of perhaps 2 million. Are the remainder fainting with eagerness to
buy the book as soon as they save up enough recyclable cans,
or did they just go "enh" when they read the review?
So if somebody *writes* such a novel – which is going to be
*very very successful* – what is the likelihood that his or
her s.o. is going to honestly like it? Especially in the absence
of the marketing hype – and indeed illuminating reviews –
which surround published works.
Surely music is the same way. I love Joni Mitchell, but how many
of her songs do I *really* like? "The last Time I Saw Richard",
yep, "Down to You", yep, "People's Parties", yep, and several
more... out of *how many* songs? She's one of the greatest
singer/songwriters ever. If my girfriend is just really, really
good, how many songs would I like?
One of the fundamental strengths of the internet is
"disintermediation". You can find an audience for almost
anything (this site gets several hits *per day*!) and you
don't *have* to do mass old-style advertising to find an
audience – they find you.
So a site like boingboing.net
[http://boingboing.net/] can be very successful
by appealing to a tiny minority. What I want to address however
is their practice of including rather long extracts of
the site operator's and his friends' sf. When I started reading
boingboing, I was eager to check them out, but everything
I have looked at has been lame, lame, lame. OTOH, my analysis
above suggests that I would probably have the same reaction
to most *successful, published* sf. So the point I'm
making is that there is something wrong with boingboing's
strategy here. The internet/web works as a filter drawing
people to *exactly what they like*, but by splashing these
stories boingboing is *actively turning people off*.
I've certainly considered removing the political (paranoid)
stories from this site, for that very reason. I didn't
bother because I never planned to make money from it.
But Cory (Mr Boingboing) is definitely planning to make
a ton of dough from boingboing. My advice – and he may well
titter that it comes from someone whose site gets one
millionth as many hits as his – is this: don't put
sappy-sounding text splurges in-line on your page, any
more than you want to add a cheesy .midi file.
Science fiction story "E for Effort" by T. L. Sherred
This story was first published in 1947 and made an immediate
impact. It has been listed as one of the ten best sf stories of all
time. The author published no other stories for six years, and
only four in all over his life:
www.sfoha.org
[http://www.sfoha.org/catalog/sp.html]
I had been trying to remember the title for months, but had been
unable to find a search term for it that worked. Eventually I
saw "A for Effort" somewhere, and it rang a bell.
Spoiler alert
An inventor creates a viewer which allows him to peek at any location
on Earth. He uses it to make documentary movies. However, his
invention can also be used to explore time. He makes movies which
record the conversations of world leaders and show exactly how and
why wars got started. He makes movies which show Jesus Christ
and Buddha.
As I reread my bald recounting of the plot, it seems like
nothing out of the ordinary. But Sherred was simply a very good
writer. His story manages to make you actually feel what it
might be like to know that you finally have a chance to
uncover the truth behind all the lies you've ever been told:
that perhaps justice will finally be done.
This made the ending, in which governments which have fallen
across the world are simply replaced by an even nastier
government which seizes the machine and destroys all copies of
the films, tremendously powerful.
I wonder what the Pol Pot commission in Cambodia will ever
achieve. We have no miraculous viewer which would tell us who
was really guilty, and if there were it would be promptly
destroyed.
Attended meeting of local bloggers
Last night I went to a bar on Sisowath and met some local bloggers.
Although they were stunned by my eloquent exposition of the proofs
that George W. Bush is the Antichrist, some of them indeed edging
away from me in their eagerness to spread the word, a few of them
managed to chat.
I've added some of their blogs to my links page:
www.panix.com
[http://www.panix.com/~dannyw/weblog/nolist/links01.html]
One of them had an interesting theory. He said that Hun Sen tolerates
condemnation in the English-language press because that's all that
foreign donors ever look at: they get the impression that there's
freedom of the press, when actually *Khmer-language* media is
controlled rigidly.
Bill agreed with me that it doesn't make much sense to sign up for
hosting physically inside Cambodia. If your users happened to be going
into the same ISP as operates your server, they might get
slightly better performance, but in general
everybody has to communicate via a government-controlled central router,
and after that they might as well go to the US. Oh, and he said
it's 50 USD/year to get a .kh domain name. Whoo. What a ripoff.
Massive cheating in US public schools
...by the teachers and principals.
The "No Child Left Behind" program mandated many controls
on school performance, but many schools are systematically
cheating to get around them, and the educational
administrations are turning a blind eye:
www.reason.com
[http://www.reason.com/0506/fe.ls.how.shtml]
My local newspaper lists area schools that have met No Child Left Behind goals and are compliant with federal law. The article will tell you that every subgroup, from low-income children and Hispanics to special education children, is proficient in reading and in math. It will not say that in California, in order for yearly progress for each subgroup to be considered adequate, only 13 percent of the children in each group must be proficient.
The "One Campaign to Make Poverty History"
For those who were unaware of it, this is a massive public-relations
effort to make people think it's a good idea to wipe the
debts of third-world nations off the books of Western governments.
The reports of this in the media have been uniformly respectful, but John
Pilger supplies an appropriate dose of left-oriented iconoclasm:
prisonplanet.com
[http://prisonplanet.com/Pages/Jul05/030705Bono.html]
I have at least as low an opinion of this media extravaganza for
boneheads as Pilger does, but my analysis is more right-wing
(I did not see any of my arguments below in the page referred to
above.)
Pilger proceeds from the assumption that Western countries have some
sort of obligation to help African countries. I don't think that,
or any variation of that.
However, it seems to me that even if you *do* want to give money to
African (or other) nations, would you really want to forgive debt
as the "One Campaign" demands?
Let's remember how all this debt was built up. Western administrations
saw that their electorates would support aid to underdeveloped nations,
so they had money to play with. International finance companies then
"developed" deals with the donee nations where Western companies were
given export guarantees from their governments. These little-remarked
agreements meant that if the donee governments were to default, the
companies would be paid by the Western governments (ie their
taxpayers).
Needless to say, the finance companies, the Western contractors,
and untold layers of middlemen made billions out of this trade,
which was *by definition* a dangerous deal because it *required*
the export guarantees. I've never seen a statistic for the proportion
of these deals which ended up covered by the guarantees.
The real beneficiaries of the proportion of the expenditure which
was not swallowed by the manufacturers and middlemen were not the
people of these nations but their utterly corrupt ruling classes.
Ridiculous projects were half-built and left to rust. (It was
often *preferable* that the deals never produce any revenue,
along the lines of the situation in "Springtime for Hitler".)
I'm not referring to the general problem of charity here – the issue
of whether goods provided without payment actually benefit the donee
at all. (For instance, if food aid is sent in an emergency, that
means local dealers who *do* have food do not make windfall profits.
That *ensures* that local dealers *do not* maintain stocks for an
emergency...) I'm referring to outright fraud, criminal fraud,
operated more in the City of London than on the continent of Africa.
As long as Western countries maintain that debt on their books,
the plutocrats who made billions every year from these utterly
corrupt deals have at the backs of their minds the idea that they
might be called to account. How much safer they would feel if these
debts could be wiped away (at the taxpayer's expense).
And how wonderful if a hundred nations across the globe no longer
had to make debt payments. Then they could apply for *new*
loans!
It's conceivable that some of those involved were just naive.
I was once chatting at a party in Boston about the AK47, and saying
it was handy for home defense. A young man, somewhat well-fed,
piped up and said he had several at his house on Cape Cod. I asked
him how he could afford them, and he said he worked for an
international bank. He said he had been involved in a deal in
Malaysia, and said he liked the Malaysians because they had
the same sexual interests as him. I pressed him for how he
knew, and he said that when he had gone there on a business
trip they had supplied him with a woman who was well-trained
in his preferences. I thought he was joking and made some
remark about the Malaysian government's incentive to quietly
investigate his preferences before discreetly fulfilling them,
but he became affronted and I did not go on.
I imagine most of the stars who associated themselves with this
criminal fraud-conspiracy are too boneheaded to know what they
are associating themselves with. I am fairly certain however that
Bob Geldof *does* know.
What do ads in photo magazines really mean?
When you look at the ads in photo magazines, you get the impression from
these full-page glossy ads that these are real, large, established
companies. You get a different impression when you call up to place
an order and you hear a TV and a crying child in the background, and
talk to someone who sounds like a grumpy grandpa dealing with the
phone for his unmarried-mother daughter while he really wants to watch
Mannix.
This guy has taken the trouble to track down and take pictures of the
registered addresses for all the photo stores in Brooklyn:
www.panix.com
[http://www.panix.com/~donwiss/pictures/BrooklynStores/]
While browsing through this catalog of fleapits it occurred to me maybe
there is a simple reason for the epidemic of "call!" entries in the
ads, where the price is supposed to be. It wasn't some sort of
magical special deal with the camera manufacturers where they weren't
*allowed* to list prices: these companies are so picayune they can
only afford to design *one ad*, and they have to keep re-running it.
Execution by injection far from paniless
New Scientist article:
www.newscientist.com
[http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn7269]
I was basically in favor of the death penalty until they did that study
– I think it was in Michigan – of DNA evidence on *convicted* prisoners.
About 50% of them – the *already convicted* prisoners – were found
*not* to match the DNA evidence.
Now, a capital trial attracts a *lot* more effort and "due process" than
most other trials. So what can we conclude about the standard of
competence/good faith for *all other* trials?
Or other aspects of the process, such as the execution itself? There is
no feedback on whether the process met its goals at all – assuming
the executee doesn't survive! The article link posted above makes the
excellent point that when you use muscle relaxant – a standard element
of the process – you make it impossible to easily detect whether the pain
has been suppressed by the anesthetic. And we're talking about a *lot*
of sodium thiopental here – some resale value perhaps?
Doctors for decades ignored patient reports that they had been awake and
in enormous pain during surgery. Why would prison authorities go out of
their way to establish whether an executee had been treated humanely?
Death by starvation hardly "mercy killing"?
I am in favor of mercy killing, and I certainly wouldn't want to be
maintained alive if I had severe injuries. I've seen old people with
dementia, and I wouldn't want to live that kind of "life" either.
On the other hand, I've never seen why the medical profession wimps out
and kills people only by withdrawing life support. They *know* that's
going to kill the patient eventually, but presumably it makes the
*doctor* feel better if he doesn't positively stick the hypo in,
or whatever. (I remember an old sf show about a totalitarian state in
which dissidents were routinely killed by lethal injection, and the
prisoner asks why the doctor bothered to wipe disinfectant on his arm
before the injection; the doctor does not reply, but we realize he
does it to help himself to still feel like a doctor.)
If I had to be executed, I'd prefer the Thai style (although I think I
read they're transitioning to lethal injection): bound to a post
and machine-gunned in the back. Of course, the legendary Thai incompetence
could screw that up too. I remember a cartoon in Khai Hua Ror about it:
the executioner is clearly inexperienced and is trembling as he approaches
the (mounted, pre-aimed) gun. The prisoner drily remarks "It's my first
time too, actually." But the pre-aiming should cut out the problem with
most executions with a firearm, ie that the shooter cannot bear to watch
the prisoner and closes his eyes when he fires. Ouch!
But I think almost anything practical would be better than lengthy starvation.
Someone agrees with me:
www.propagandamatrix.com
[http://www.propagandamatrix.com/articles/march2005/240305dehydrationdeath.htm]
A big Indian guy with a pillow would be a lot better than the hypocrisy
and lack of moral fibre of the current situation.
Site has selection of funny quotes from irc/IM chat
www.bash.org
[http://www.bash.org/?top]
You have to have some techy training to understand a lot of the
jokes because they depend on recognizing the kind of mistakes
that bonehead newbies make (but of course we were all that way
at one time).
The following quotes are a little more x-rated than I usually
run but I think they're worth it.
#262353 +(4403)- [X]
<MooseOnDaLoose> Hey Mike
<goatboy> what?
<MooseOnDaLoose> Pussy.
<goatboy> er?
<MooseOnDaLoose> Pussy.
<goatboy> and?
<MooseOnDaLoose> Pussy.
<goatboy> ...
<MooseOnDaLoose> Pussy.
<goatboy> i dont get it
<MooseOnDaLoose> AND YOU NEVER WILL.
<goatboy> bastard
Here's another quote that you don't meed tech background to understand:
#15641 +(3554)- [X]
<superwoman> I had a boyfriend once that made me suck him off while I had a mouthful of beer.
<GrandCow> HAHAHAHA that was me bitch!
<superwoman> DANNY?!?!?!
<GrandCow> MOM?!?!?!?!
The difference between me and the New York Times
In the course of a Slashdot thread on blogging:
slashdot.org
[http://slashdot.org/articles/05/02/11/2049220.shtml]
a poster made the following comment:
Big Media (NYTimes, etc) long term are in no better shape than record or film companies. They claim to be the arbiters of intellectual property but in reality we see that once you eliminate manufacturing and distribution costs, they are no better or no different than a guy in his basement. These firms were not in fact media firms but manufacturers and distributors.
There was a lot of discussion of this "disintermediation" thing a few
years ago, but I guess it died down a lot after the dotcoms bombed.
I think a lot of things that were blue-sky then are actually starting
to happen.
After all, exactly *why* do we respect the NYT? Is it really because we
or anybody else has actually been able to *evaluate* their journalistic
standards? In fact, haven't there been cases where the NYT has simply
lied about its own practices? Really, what they have is money and power.
On the other hand, if you're reading this *at* the New York Times, I don't
mean it! Please keep printing my letters.
How to handle to-do lists without a PDA
A few years ago I used a PDA religiously for all note-taking. It was
doable but after a while I got tired of nagging problems with data entry
and started doing updates on the computer. I'm still doing that –
I guess – but I'm three months behind!
What I'm currently using is a little plastic wallet made by using a
pair of scissors to cut up a plastic letter-size folder. You can
fit it, with ten or twenty 3x5 cards inside, in most breast pockets (though
it often pokes geekily above the top of the pocket).
I thought I had the idea myself – and still have not found anything
similar available for sale in Phnom Penh, but it turns out it's
one of the ideas discussed on the blog "43folders":
www.43folders.com
[http://www.43folders.com/2004/09/introducing_the.html]
Here's another bunch of ideas:
blog.fastcompany.com
[http://blog.fastcompany.com/archives/2003/12/12/where_do_you_get_your_ideas_from_ii.html]
www.innovationtools.com
[http://www.innovationtools.com/Articles/ArticleDetails.asp?a=113]
The "Deer Hunter" in Birchwood Wisconsin -- or "First Blood"?
Several papers carried the story of a multiple shooting incident
in Birchwood Wisconsin, in which apparently some hunters on
private property encountered a Hmong (for people with little
familiarity with SE Asia I should point out that the Hmong
are a people who used to live across the borders of Cambodia,
Vietnam and Laos, and who were enlisted as allies by the US
in the Vietnam War era), and after some sort of
altercation five people wound up shot dead and others wounded,
but the Hmong was picked up later by police.
www.canoe.ca
[http://www.canoe.ca/NewsStand/EdmontonSun/News/2004/11/23/726855.html]
From the brief info available, it's hard to know what happened,
but it reminds me a lot of "First Blood". If you were armed in
the woods, and two guys pointed rifles at you, what would you
do? The Hmong was reported to be too young to have actually been
in combat during the Vietnam war, but the date he came to the US
was not stated. Hmong have been coming to the US in small
numbers almost continuously, via Cambodia and Thailand.
Conceivably he may have been used to confrontations in which
you would rather die than be taken prisoner.
On the other hand, he was reportedly armed with an SKS. I'm
not even sure that's a legal hunting weapon in Wisconsin:
while it is not a true assault rifle, because it has an
integral 10-round magazine loaded from a stripper clip, and
has no selective-fire full-auto option, I suspect it was
handier than a bolt-action rifle or pump-action shotgun when
he needed it. On the other other hand, if you don't carry a
scary-looking firearm like the SKS, maybe things don't
escalate as fast.
Anyway, I always feel sympathy for the Hmong. Like the Kurds,
their loyalty and commitment have been cruelly abused by US
policy.
Speculation about asteroid impact measures
A recent Slashdot discussion about the announcement of a close approach:
science.slashdot.org
[http://science.slashdot.org/science/04/09/25/1932215.shtml]
(Incidentally, the name "Toutatis" of this asteroid sounds like something
Captain Haddock would say to a bunch of "bibliomanes".)
Several posters rightly point out that using a nuclear bomb to
blow up an incoming asteroid doesn't help because all but very small
fragments will go straight through the atmosphere with insignificant
ablation, and even if you pulverise it to *dust* the dust *still* has
the same incoming velocity and kinetic energy, so now all the energy
is converted into raising the temperature of the atmosphere, probably
to several hundred degrees – a suboptimal outcome.
Another point occurs to me howeevr. Surely it might be possible
to arrange that the detonation of the antiasteroid device splits
the incoming object into multiple parts all of which are *slowly
moving apart from each other*. If you hit the asteroid a few days
or weeks before the collision, don't you have time for the fragments
to have spread out by multiples of the size of the planet? So
that the cross-section of the incoming object "matrix" is very
sparse?
I'm too lazy to do the calculation of the amount of energy required
to provide say one m/s on a respectable-size asteroid. Also, it may well
be that it is just impractical to design a system which will reliably
transfer the energy of a nuclear device into kinetic energy rather
than simple heating, when we can't even predict the structure of the
incoming object. Also, perhaps the system is a tough sell: "Whaddya
mean, there's a *probability* of still getting hit??"
Still, I'd like to see the point addressed.
It also occurs to me that when you create the "matrix", it doesn't just
go away. It is very unlikely that an incoming object on a *random*
course will intersect with the planet; it is far more likely that
the object is coming in on the plane of the ecliptic from *behind*
the planet (as the planet orbits around the sun), so that it has the
maximum time to be captured by the planet's gravity well. The object
fragments would *not* be given escape velocity from their own center
of gravity (hmmm – well, maybe they might, but like I said I'm
too lazy to do the math), so they would basically continue to hang
around Earth's orbit, with an extremely high chance of intersecting
again.
So humans might save the Earth from annihilation in 2036, but then
realize that unless they maintain space capability continuously for
the next 40,000 years (in order to deal with each incoming fragment),
the Earth would be pulverized every two or three years. Hmmm.
The maikimo.net weblog
maikimo.net
[http://maikimo.net/weblog/]
I happened across this guy when I was looking for info on
port forwarding (I was considering setting it up to see
if I could get around some sort of browser block on my
local machine). He seems generally clueful about such
technical stuff, and he is nearly as anti-Bush as I am.
He is also a committed Christian.
A lot of people who are used to voting Democrat seem to
think that Christians are per se committed Republican
voters. Libertarians often think the same way. But it
turns out there is a surprisingly wide coalition of
people who are against war and lies and hatred. (Kerry,
of course, says he would have fought the war much more
successfully... riiight.)
I also quite like his site layout, as well as his cheerful
admission of problems:
IE layout wonkage
Oh, bother. Somewhere along the line I've broken my main page layout in Win IE6. It's fine in Gecko-based browsers like Firefox and in Safari. I almost never use Windows or IE any more, and had forgotten until today to fire 'em up for a layout check.
(Hmph – in order to paste that in I had to fix his non-ASCII
apostrophes – I would be more censorious if my own site
hadn't had that problem till recently.)
Using your cellphone on an aircraft
I've heard apparently insightful ideas on both points of view
on this: that cell phones can interfere with navigation and hit
multiple towers; or that Flight 93 allowed several hijack victims to
have long conversations, so evidently they work fine.
Here's a Slashdot discussion which goes over some old ground, now
that a gizmo has been proposed to allow people to use their own cellphones
after all:
science.slashdot.org
[http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/09/03/004233]
Reading it, it occurred to me that my own theory – that Flight 93 had
been shot down by some hapless National Guard airman who hadn't been
informed by the Illuminati to let the plane continue – could be wrong.
Perhaps all those people *trying to use their cellphones* made the
plane dive into the ground.
The shoot-down theory:
www.mirror.co.uk
[http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/allnews/page.cfm?objectid=12192317&method=full&siteid=50143]
Links to pool theory guides
I have been looking for a simple introductory book on pool, but can't
find one. They don't seem to have them in Thailand, even in Thai. It
really bugs me when I'm watching pool on TV and the commentators say
"well now all he has to do is a simple stun shot!" and by golly I've
tried to do a stun a hundred times and succeeded only by chance.
I've occasionally tried to find good basic instructional sites, but
they tend to be a little fragmented and aimed above my (primeval
slime) level. This site for instance is very good, but he concentrates
on where the *cue* ball goes after the hit, when I can't even be sure
how to get the *object* ball to go where I want.
www.engr.colostate.edu
[http://www.engr.colostate.edu/~dga/pool/]
One of his pages might be interesting even to someone with little
interest in pool: he analyzes several movies about pool games, and
it turns out that the shots in, for example, "The Hustler" are
actually real and you can try most of them yourself:
www.engr.colostate.edu
[http://www.engr.colostate.edu/%7Edga/pool/bd_articles/aug04.pdf]
The following link for snooker (real snooker, not 8-ball, which Thais
call snooker... when I was asking Thai shop assistants about books I
absent-mindedly called it "pool" a couple of times creating even more
incomprehension than usual) instruction is more like my level:
www.snookergames.co.uk
[http://www.snookergames.co.uk/tuition.html]
Funny article about pool physics which stops just as it is getting good:
www.billiardworld.com
[http://www.billiardworld.com/physics.html]
The same guy has an article which *does* get to the issue: of how to
do a stop/draw shot. I wonder if I can figure this out?
www.billiardworld.com
[http://www.billiardworld.com/draw.html]
Frequently-asked questions for pool/billiards:
www.faqs.org
[http://www.faqs.org/faqs/sports/billiards/faq/]
Some interesting links, eg "easy pool tutor":
www.knowledgehound.com
[http://www.knowledgehound.com/topics/pool.htm]
"Multiverse theory" from Propagandamatrix.com
Propagandamatrix usually has paranoid stories about politics, eg:
www.whatreallyhappened.com
[http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/goldstein.html]
which suggests that Osama bin Laden's real name is Emmanuel Goldstein.
Occasionally however it goes over the edge into the kind of all-encompassing
dread which makes life worth living. For instance, here's a story about
the multiverse theory, which suggests that not only is this not the main
universe, it's probably not even a real universe but only a simulation:
www.propagandamatrix.com
[http://www.propagandamatrix.com/articles/july2004/220704multiversetheory.htm]
It includes a link to a nice little site which has a lot of links to the
background to this concept:
www.simulation-argument.com
[http://www.simulation-argument.com/]
A few of my postings on similar themes:
www.panix.com
[http://www.panix.com/~dannyw/weblog/Miscellaneous/flyingcar01.html]
www.panix.com
[http://www.panix.com/~dannyw/weblog/Miscellaneous/altworlds02.html]
www.panix.com
[http://www.panix.com/~dannyw/weblog/Miscellaneous/narnia01.html]
www.panix.com
[http://www.panix.com/~dannyw/weblog/Miscellaneous/altworlds01.html]
How to get a mechanical or electronic design fabricated
Over the last ten years most small PCB – printed-circuit-board –
manufacturers have moved to the web: using their design software,
you can create a design, upload it and get a fully fabbed board
including plated-through holes and gold pads in a few days.
Now there's the "eMachineShop" system which can do the same thing
for mechanical parts. You can design a part in their 3D software,
specify a finish and whatnot, and it just shows up. Of course, you
have to pay them the big bucks.
Article by Bill Machrone in PC Magazine:
www.pcmag.com
[http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1759,1621252,00.asp]
There may be a few naive people out there who need to be reminded that
if you design a part using software that only works with one supplier, you
would need to redesign (and re-debug) that part to shift to a different
supplier.
Slashdot discussion:
slashdot.org
[http://slashdot.org/articles/04/07/16/2030222.shtml]
Sample quote (I wrote the warning above *before* reading this, I promise):
About Pad2Pad... (Score:5, Informative)
by Anonymous Coward on Friday July 16, @08:35PM (#9723121)
I work in the PCB (Printed Circuit Board) industry, and I've looked at the Pad2pad website before. The problem with them is this - they give you software to create a board in, but it only outputs in their proprietary format. That means your design can only be fabricated by pad2pad, not by anyone else. So, once you've designed in their software, you are locked into ordering boards from them. You cannot order them anywhere else unless you re-design it in another software package.
There are older DOS freeware PCB layout packages called easytrax and autotrax available from Protel [www.protel.com
[http://www.protel.com/]] as well as a free 30 day demo of their latest. There is also a Linux PCB layout package available. [bach.ece.jhu.edu
[http://bach.ece.jhu.edu/~haceaton/pcb/]] These packages output gerber data, which is the industry standard data format for circuit boards. It is also an open format (rumor has it /. people like that sort of thing). This means that you can send your design to any PCB shop in the world, and they can read it as easily as you can work with a *.bmp.
You can even send your gerber data to pad2pad, and they can make your board from that, though they would prefer if you used their software. After all, if you don't, you'll be able to get the boards make somewhere else if you don't like their service.
And that would be so unfashionable - doncha know proprietary lock-in is all the rage these days?
Modafinil (Provigil) -- a drug for wakefulness without a high
This sounds like it could really help me. I've always been wary of
recreational drugs – I can't really even deal with the effects of caffeine.
But with Modafinil (trade name Provigil, by Cephalon) the stories
say specifically that there is no euphoria. (On the other hand,
there *does* seem to be a craving. Both cocaine and heroin were initially
reported as being free of addictive effects.)
www.washingtonpost.com
[http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&node=&contentId=A61282-2002Jun16¬Found=true]
slate.msn.com
[http://slate.msn.com/id/2079113/]
Funnily enough both the journalists who wrote the stories above based
their story on taking Modafinil while *writing* the story. Hmmm.
One great application is already obvious: the trip from the US to
Asia. DC to Bangkok has taken me about 30 hours from the airport to
the hotel room. It would be great if I could feel confident of feeling
alert the whole time, especially if there is no crash (fatigue-induced
I mean!) at the far end. Also, it might make some slack available for
foulups. I could imagine a 2025 flight being cancelled with another one
available at 0655 or 2025 tomorrow: tired already, I would probably
not try to struggle with my luggage, find a hotel, get a meal, try to
sleep and get back to the airport at 0655, but with Modafinil I
might be able to hang out in the coffee bar all night. So I could
save a day as well as hotel and taxi charges.
NASA had scheme for saucer-shaped craft -- in 1999
In a Slashdot discussion on using lasers to beam energy to lifting bodies
in order to accelerate reaction mass, one poster gave a link to this
NASA page:
science.nasa.gov
[http://science.nasa.gov/newhome/headlines/prop16apr99_1.htm]
My goal has been to cut the cost of getting to space by a factor of 1,000 using a system that is completely green," [Prof. Leik Myrabo] explained of his passion for the past three decades. Since 1972, he has been building on an idea developed by Arthur Kantrowitz to use lasers to launch satellites. Myrabo introduced a variation using the atmosphere as the propellant heated by a laser. At higher altitude and at 5.5 times the speed of sound, as the air thins, the craft would use a small supply of on board hydrogen, still heated by the remote laser beam.
This seems quite interesting but sadly dates back to 1999. I found a
website apparently set up to attract investors, but their "Breaking
News" section has this as the most recent story:
December 2000
A laser named CORA, powerful enough to launch LTI's prototypes to the edge of space, is being shipped to White Sands Missile Range. LTI is planning to test a future set of lightcraft on CORA to set new altitude records beyond 1000 feet!
Oh well. Myrabo is still attending conferences:
www.space-access.org
[http://www.space-access.org/updates/sa04schd.html]
There were a few more hits in Google that *seemed* to have more recent dates,
but the material actually dates back to 2000.
My suspicions about Joan Bakewell interview
Joan Bakewell is a famous and senior manager at the BBC. Yesterday I saw an
interview with her ("Hard Talk") on BBC World.
One of the reasons she is famous is because of her affair with Harold Pinter
(the playwright) (while she was married to someone else).
At one point the interviewer was making the point that things have
improved a lot for women since she started her career; for instance
it used to be BBC policy to prevent both husband and wife working at the
BBC. Bakewell responded that she believed it was still the case that
the policy was to prevent them working in the same department, based
on "a history of unfortunate incidents".
The funny thing was that there was a very obvious cut at that point and
the interview was on a completely different topic. I'm pretty sure
Bakewell and the interviewer exchanged hearty chortles over their inside
knowledge of several such "incidents", and then, wiping the tears of
laughter from their eyes, concurred that that's never going on the air.
O tempora, o mores -- Larry King and CNN promos
I suppose I could put "o tempora o mores" as a heading for 99% of my
posts... anyway what I'm grouching about here is a promo that has
been running fifty million times on CNN for its various feature
newsclowns. What is striking about the promo is how incredibly weak
the message is in most cases. I took the time to note down
the statement intoned by Larry King (their celebrity interviewer):
A great interview is when the subject responds to the questions asked
Does this mean anything at all? What on earth did King, or the
gamma who selected it for the blurb, think it means?
I searched for the line because I wanted to look at the text of
the entire blurb, but all I could find was this:
examinedlife.typepad.com
[http://examinedlife.typepad.com/johnbelle/2004/05/department_of_f.html]
which is definitely unimpressed also.
I have heard a theory about jingles that they are *deliberately*
written with musical flaws because if the jingle is too smooth it
is too easy to tune out. Well, CNN certainly made me pay attentin
to their promo – it led me to conclude that King or CNN's
marketing department is cretinous.
Detecting collusion in pool championships -- my theory of games
One of the few games I enjoy watching on TV is pool (even though the
color bandwidth, at least as it arrives at my TV, is too low to
accurately display the color of the balls, except in closeup).
Having watched an embarrassingly large number of games, my
ever-paranoid mind found a new issue to worry about. I started
to notice that when a higher-ranked player plays a lower-ranked
player, he *usually* loses several racks at the start of the game.
After he's about 3 racks down, he starts playing much better.
It's truly unusual for the better player to edge out the lesser
player at a consistent rate through the game.
This first became obvious to me with Efren "The Magician" Reyes.
I guess I was most suspicious about him because, as his
nickname suggests, he can when necessary come up with
*astonishing* shots; indeed he does so once or twice on
most of the games I've seen him play. I started to think
"hey waitaminute. If he can do that sometimes, how can he
possibly play so badly at other times?" And then I started
noticing that the "other times" were always the *beginning*
of the game.
My theory is that the organizers of the championships collude
with the players and say "the punters don't want to see the
top guys just rolling over the weaker guys every time. Here's
your 'handicap' so that the games are more fun to watch".
Now that theory assumes that there is some *definition* of
what makes a game fun to watch. And that's a really interesting
question. When I think about it, I don't really *know* what's
fun about watching (or even playing) a game. It does indeed
seem to me however that a relatively well-matched game is
more fun to watch.
(Another issue that affects viewer enjoyment, but not relevant
to collusion, is how expert *either* player is. I was watching
a snooker game on Thai TV recently and neither player was
up to the standard I'm used to. It didn't help that I couldn't
understand the Thai commentary, but really the basic play was
so much less competent that I couldn't detect what shot the
players had *intended* in many cases. In particular, they
frequently just slammed the cueball with no apparent plan at
all other than "let's see what happens" and I found that
*particularly* tedious.)
Now of course I'm too lazy to actually do the work to *prove*
my assertion about collusion. It's interesting to think that
the normal stats for games only record the *final* score, so
even if I somehow tracked down the stats for umpteen games
they would not be analyzable for this issue.
However what *could* be done is this: one could analyze the
overall stats for each player to determine a ranking (this
would not be trivial because his ranking can legitimately
shoft with time) and then examine the final scores for each
player as a function of the ranking of his opponent. My guess
is that for lower-ranked players there would be a clear
relationship – ie, without a "handicap", they would score
better against lower-ranked opponents – whereas for the
top-ranked players like Reyes, the relationship would be
much flatter: ie for most opponents he would win by a
reltively constant number, and only against truly comparable
opponents would there be a strong relationship to their
ranking.
I suppose it's conceivable that there could be another explanation,
asuming the effect I describe is discernible in the stats: maybe
Reyes just doesn't try very hard against an opponent he isn't afraid
of. I wonder if one could ask players whether they feel that way.
Plots that only work in a movie
I'm using the term "plot" to refer to both the story of a book or
movie, and a conspiracy.
One of my cable channels has been interminably rerunning a movie about a
father who sees an angel who orders him to kill people around the
neighborhood, and who drags his two young sons into the murders.
Now if someone just *told* you he'd seen an angel, there wouldn't be much
question, right? You'd blurt out "You're a nutter!" and run off.
But in a movie, *maybe it's a real angel" – so the suspense side of the plot
works, at least for a while. (I've never bothered to watch the movie for
more than a few minutes, now and then.)
Another example was a TV movie I saw way back, around 1970. It was set in
an Italian resort hotel. An Englishman was vacationing there with his wife
and daughter, and since at the beginning of the movie he informs the
puzzled hotel staff that his wife has been called away and now he is alone
with his daughter, the father starts to feel more and more sexually
attracted to the daughter and winds up in bed with her.
Even in 1970s England this was a pretty racy plot, so I was hardly surprised
that the woman playing the daughter looked distinctly too old for the
role. I suppose there are all sorts of restrictions on the type of
storyline a minor actor can even be involved with, even if the dirty deed is
never shown explicitly.
I was extremely impressed when the denoument turned out to be that *there
was no daughter*. The husband and the wife were role-playing for the
sake of a forbidden turn-on. The hotel staff were puzzled and disapproving
not because of actual incest but because they had been dragged into a
kinky farce! Again, this plot only worked *because it was inside a TV
movie*. In reality, any onlooker would have known that the female was
not fourteen years old.
Dragging my train of thought back to conspiracies, I suppose the relevance
is that many conspiracy cover stories only work if the onlooker can be
brought to view them not as reality, his own experience of what's
possible and plausible can be used, but as some sort of fictional world
where anything's possible. Maybe in that world, towelheads can collapse
the twin towers.
By which I don't mean there was not real bravery that day. It was clear
from the first reports that almost everything the firemen did was wrong,
but they didn't know that at the time, and I wouldn't have either.
My T-shirt idea:
NYFD
Forever in our hearts
they climb those stairs
to save us
What are those damn slogans they print on T-shirts *good for*?
It has always irritated me that some people wear clothes with commercial
slogans on them: usually T-shirts, but sometimes dresses or bags. I
find advertising in all forms intrusive, and they add to it for
everyone who encounters them.
I recently thought about those who wear *meaningless* slogans. For
instance, most of us have heard that English slogans are worn by
people who do not *understand* English, and the slogans are often
fractured, bizarre or meaningless.
Graffiti artists love to find a *blank* wall to put their graffiti on
because it makes their slogan stand out. People who present
*meaningless* messages are like the building operators who paint
their walls in a random pattern to discourage graffiti artists:
they create a sort of "white noise" for the eye, like those gadgets
you can buy to mask noise so that you can sleep.
Of course, people who buy these meaningless T-shirts are probably
just stupid.
Credit cards from US banks are much less secure than those from elsewhere
Slashdot discussion:
slashdot.org
[http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/06/02/1919217]
Relatively free of conspiract theories, it has postings from more than
one Polish resident whose bank offers far better security than almost
any bank in the USA. Poland. Yeesh.
It reminds me of complaints about English plumbing: sewer pipes on the
outside, no hot/cold mixer taps, etc. The reason is simple: England
got plumbing codes *first*, when a lot of problems hadn't been
figured out. Mixer valves, under various error conditions, can siphon
contaminated water back into the supply, for instance. I don't know
the details, but you probably need to hold various specs in the
pipework as well as providing a mixer tap that meets USA specs. At
any rate, UK plumbing codes were not updated for a long, long time –
out of caution as well as inertia. (For all I know, you *still* can't
install a mixer tap in the UK.)
The diary of a porn publisher
This guy blogs and does a porn website:
www.sexxxxpics.com
[http://www.sexxxxpics.com/blog/]
This guy blogs about Iraq in almost a diametrically opposite way to me (he
thinks that it's OK to torture captives, which I only do under certain
cuircumstances) but it's still readable and interesting. There are some
photos on his site so most people will enjoy it a lot more than mine,
although they seem a little tame.
Irritatingly, I didn't see any *technical* stuff about his site. Maybe he
doesn't really run one: he just gets paid for links from his blog!
...Oh, I see: this is the link to the porn site:
sexxxxpics.com
[http://sexxxxpics.com/index.shtml]
If it might worry you, it seems to be mainly hetero S/M.
He seems a little technically clueless generally. He needed a tech to
come in and install his new computer for him. Also, his old computer
keeps rebooting, which he should be aware sounds like that recent
worm, or virus, or whatever it was.
Also, he was spending *days* copying files from his old computer. Why
doesn't he just hook up the drive to his new computer? (Because that
one doesn't work either.)
The password to launch US ICBMs was "0000000"
Link to Slashdot story:
slashdot.org
[http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/05/29/2242203]
You might not believe it... anyway there's a lot of good stuff about
passwords.
Where is my beautiful flying car?
Another site makes the point that this timeline has not been optimized
for turning out like it was supposed to:
www.davidszondy.com
[http://www.davidszondy.com/future/futurepast.htm]
It's heavy on graphics, but the text is good.
Slashdot discussion of the site:
slashdot.org
[http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/05/28/1737239]
"Brooklyn Project" by William Tenn
This is a short sf story which I read about forty years ago and still
remember. It's referred to in the following Slashdot discussion about
the upcoming movie of Ray Bradury's "Sound of Thunder" (as they are both
time travel stories).
I don't want to spoil the story for anyone who hasn't read it (the Slashdot
mention gives away the ending). I just want to make the point that I
haven't seen a single reference to that story since I read it (despite
hanging out at sf conventions occasionally) and it gives me a good feeling
to know that someone else values and remembers it. (I recently considered
Googling for it but decided that the search terms I could remember would be
too generic).
Slashdot discussion:
slashdot.org
[http://slashdot.org/articles/04/05/24/0220236.shtml]
Ranma 1/2 -- a very strange Japanese anime
I have avoided getting into anime, ever since I saw some at sf conventions
way back in the seventies and found it both incomprehensible and turgid.
I still feel that way about Dragonball-Z.
But today I happened to run across an anime which was incomprehensible *yet
fascinating*. (I have the excuse that it was broadcast in Japanese.)
It's the story of Saotome:
Meet Saotome Ranma, a sixteen year old martial artist with a very unusual life. Being cursed by the Jusenkyou springs, he becomes a cute busty red-headed girl when splashed with cold water. It doesn't help at all that some of his rivals, Kunou for example, are in love with his female side.
That's excerpted from here:
www.aaanime.net
[http://www.aaanime.net/ranma/]
It vaguely reminds me of an episode of Xena Warrior Princess, which was set
in the present: all the characters had been reincarnated in *each other's*
bodies, largely with gender reversal. It was not
insanely great (the way the makers of "Buffy the Vampire
Slayer" might have achieved) but it was strangely affecting, referring as it
does to the whole concept of accidence. How might we have developed in another
body, or another country?
I just saw in the paper that David Reimer, whose circumcision surgery was so
botched that his penis was removed and he was raised as a girl, committed
suicide on 2004-05-04. His case of course was absolutely appalling and we
can hardly imagine being in such a terrible position, but we are all expected
to play a role, and in a game, which we did not choose.
seattletimes.nwsource.com
[http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2001927590_reimer13.html]
More confirmation that credit-card companies don't care about fraud
I've noticed before that credit-card companies have an oddly supine
reaction when I call them up breathlessly excited about some problem.
Slashdot discussion confirming why this is:
ask.slashdot.org
[http://ask.slashdot.org/askslashdot/04/05/21/0135204.shtml]
Phlogivity -- or an inverse theory of gravity
I have a vague recollection that an alternative theory of gravity is
that mass does not actually attract, but actually *shields* a universal
*repulsive* force. (Currently dark matter, and dark energy, are invoked
to explain the fact that the galaxies are moving apart and *accelerating*.)
I made a *very tiny* attempt to find this theory on the net but couldn't.
I think it's related to the Mach hypothesis. "Phlogivity" is a name I
just made up, from the mediaeval "phlogiston" theory of combustion.
(Phlogiston is the heat and light given off by burning: it has negative
mass, which is why the products of combustion weigh more than they
did before. For a long time the phlogiston theory matched results quite
well.)
Actually, I can't visualize the effect clearly enough to see whether
it would really produce equivalent results, especially at a short
displacement from irregular objects.
Unfortunately any experiment to *test* the hypothesis would involve
a mass detector at a short distance away from an irregularly shaped
mass. I vaguely envision a rotor with four arms. On two, radially
opposite, arms, there are smooth, I guess cylindrical weights. On
the other two arms there are weights with the same mass *but which have
some sort of hole in them* such that as the rotor rotates a
gravitiational sensor placed next to the circumference of the weights
is briefly *unshielded* by the weight (mass).
We could then record an AC signal from the detector which should on
the normal theory of gravity match for the two pairs of arms, but
on the shielding "phlogivity" theory will show a blip as the hole
passes next to the sensor.
As I say, as I can't really do the math on the geometry suggested
by the phlogivity theory, I can't really choose a design for the hole
(or slit) which would differentiate the results between the theories.
However, I think it would be quite easy to *experiment* with
different configurations.
You could easily null out vibration by using four identical masses,
etc.
Another option for "disposable" credit cards
I have posted before that American Express has an option for this.
www.panix.com
[http://www.panix.com/~dannyw/weblog/Miscellaneous/creditcards1.html]
Now I see from a Slashdot discussion that MBNA has something similar – maybe
better:
www.mbna.com
[http://www.mbna.com/creditcards/]
yro.slashdot.org
[http://yro.slashdot.org/yro/04/05/18/0128201.shtml]
Another thought about the pyramids
Watching a breathless fluff show on Discovery today I heard the
announcer call one of the Pyramids mankind's oldest stone building.
It occurred to me that probably what it is is the oldest *surviving*
stone building. It survives because it was so badly overdesigned.
There were probably *plenty* of previous, and subsequent, stone
buildings that were sensibly designed for a limited period... like
500 years!
The program also suggested that the earliest pyramids were more prone
to deterioration because their sides had an excessive slope, but I
noticed that South American pyramids were far steeper. Oh well: they've
only had to survive about a half or a third as long.
An interesting experiment to demonstrate the existence of parallel worlds
Slashdot discussion:
science.slashdot.org
[http://science.slashdot.org/science/04/05/14/0324256.shtml?tid=133&tid=134&tid=186]
Using just a LED pointer one can carry out an experiment which, according to the
physicist David Deutsch, demonstrates the existence of parallel worlds as
the simplest explanation for the results.
I particularly liked the following joke comment:
You bastards! (Score:5, Funny)
by Merovign (557032) on Friday May 14, @03:47AM (#9148722)
science.slashdot.org
[http://science.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=107550&cid=9148722]
(www.merovign.com
[http://www.merovign.com/)]
I tried this, and everything changed! I'm fat! My beautiful wife is gone! My beautiful aircar is gone! All of my stuff is crammed into this stupid apartment!
I can't even find a link to the nearest spaceport on Google!
How do I get back home?!?!?!?!?!
A few years ago I thought I was the only guy in the world who wondered
where his aircar had gone.
I guess before that, people wondered why they never moored dirigibles
to the Empire State building.
Btw, I think "My Beautiful Wife" is a reference to a pop song
by David Byrne (Talking Heads). Lyrics (title: Once in a Lifetime):
www.thismustbetheplace.net
[http://www.thismustbetheplace.net/talking-heads-albums-remain-in-light-lyrics.asp]
It is probably also an ironic reference to the inability of Slashdot readers
to get laid, at least in this universe.
Incidentally, there was a long time in the sixties and seventies when I thought
this timeline was becoming dangerously unlikely and we would start to notice
various milieu infringement effects. However, the current political situation
does not seem unlikely at all. It is perfectly straightforward: it just happens
to be very very bad.
Some links about my aliens/anaesthesia posting
A couple of days ago I made a posting speculating that some cases
where a subject has a kidnapped-by-space-aliens memory could be
a result of anaesthesia mixups.
It occurred to me that I had not provided any links to the occurrence
of surgery where the anaesthetist immobilizes the patient while providing
zero pain relief:
129.67.60.7
[http://129.67.60.7/Uploads/DynamicText/pandit.pdf]
Also: www.institute-shot.com
[http://www.institute-shot.com/anesthesia_and_surgery.htm]
which has some interesting studies and speculation on peculiar
memory effects due to anaesthesia.
In finding these links, I ran across something I hadn't known before:
doctors *deliberately* carried out surgery on infants without
anaesthesia, until the sixties. They had some kind of superstition that
infants felt no pain (probably as a result of the necessity to have a
pretext for the Jewish practice of circumcision, which is otherwise –
or if you think about it for a minute – barbaric). Apparently pain relief
was finally authorized in 1999.
www.cirp.org
[http://www.cirp.org/library/psych/chamberlain/]
Circumcision pain:
www.cirp.org
[http://www.cirp.org/library/pain/]
Ludicrous pomposity and blockheadedness in British medical profession:
www.johnpowell.net
[http://www.johnpowell.net/pages/sixties.htm]
A boring explanation for the "kidnapped by space aliens" thing
The whole "recovered memory" field has become unpopular over the last
few years, for several reasons. One reason was that people realized that
children could easily be induced to remember nonexistent abuse (or
anything else). Another reason was that when child-abuse scandals were
finally investigated properly, the strong pressures and incentives
for the prosecution became clear.
On the other hand, an interesting scientific point also became clear:
there was no plausible scientific reality to *forgetting* memories
which are interesting enough to remember later.
I wondered about this with UFO abduction stories, although of course
space aliens might be able to do anything they like to one's mind
(so why don't they do a less half-assed job?).
I had always thought about the similarity of the "anal probe" stories
to an *ordinary hospital environment*. Very often when you're in a
hospital bed, you're semiconscious and full of tranquillizers: you
might have any number of distortions of perception. If they involve
Barney the dinosaur turning into your gym teacher, you can't sell the
story to the Enquirer. But doctors and nurses who look three feet
tall and stick things up your bottom every two hours are a
college fund.
But for the "anal probe" stuff, the hospital idea doesn't
explain *forgetting and then remembering*.
Recently another idea occurred to me which could tie everything
together. When an anaesthetist prepares you for surgery, he gives
you not just one drug, but a mixture. Each drug has different effects;
you can't use just one, even though they have somewhat similar effects,
because you'd need a (more usually) lethal dosage. In particular,
you get a soporific, such as morphine, in combination with curare,
which is a paralyzing agent.
Curare seems strange, but the argument is that your body's
autonomic response – ie, even if you were totally unconscious throughout –
would cause muscle reactions during surgery – a very bad idea. Enough
morphine to still such reactions without using any curare
would certainly stop your heart – another suboptimal outcome.
The problem is that there have been a number of documented cases where
by some mixup the patient has received only the paralyzing agent and
not the soporific! It's incredibly awful – you suffer all the pain of
the surgery and you can't move a muscle to let them know! They may detect
higher pulse rate or something but it doesn't cross their minds that
you're suffering. (It's hard enough to convince your doctor of that
when you can yell right at him in his office.)
The medical profession's initial response was of course to hush it up. In
all published cases, the victims had to overcome a barrage of bland denials,
and only succeeded in their lawsuits because they happened to retain
information about the other events during the surgery.
More recently, I have the impression – my paranoid suspicion only –
that anaesthetists have started adding drugs with the same mode of action
as the "date rape drug" Rohypnol to the cocktail. So even if you suffer
ghastly unbearable pain during the surgery, you can't
remember it the next day and sue.
Well, back to anal probes. My guess is that the weird cocktail of
drugs, many of which have powerful and under-investigated effects on
the memory, is what causes the otherwise-implausible "recovered
memory" effects. And it might well cause the memory to become
disconnected from the actual occurrence of the events which are
being (mis-)remembered.
Voight-Kampff test administered to SF candidates
The "Wave Magazine" had the excellent idea of administering the same
test used in "Blade Runner" to San Francisco mayoral candidates.
www.thewavemag.com
[http://www.thewavemag.com/pagegen.php?pagename=article&articleid=24031]
The responses are amazingly like the ones in the movie; the interviewer
was quick enough to adapt his own responses to match the movie
detective, too. (Perhaps they cheated a little.)
It reminds me that a large part of the original *book*, "Do Androids
Dream of Electric Sheep", dealt with not the difficulty of identifying
androids, but the difficulty of *real* humans proving that they *are*
real. A few weeks ago I made the point to some guy in Phnom Penh that
his accent no longer sounded like that of someone born in England
(he'd actually moved with his family to France as a teenager) and after
denying it more and more heatedly he started offering to fight me.
Perhaps I shouldn't hang out at Vietnamese shophouses where
the proprietor, on greeting me, says "now one of the requirements here
is you have to like to drink". Oh well, I guess *I* failed the empathy
test.
Hasbro releases downloadable PDFs of their "Monopoly" money
www.hasbro.com
[http://www.hasbro.com/monopoly/pl/page.treasurechest/dn/default.cfm]
I got this from a link at:
boingboing.net
[http://boingboing.net/]
It seems very cool that Hasbro is making this stuff available. One reason
I followed the link from boingboing was that I wondered if Hasbro would
have an *explanation* but if so it's not on that page.
For some reason the page printed out at some sort of miniature size,
ten bills per page. You'd need to resize it somehow to get the bills the
"standard" size (or did they downsize the dimensions of the bills on
a recommendation from Arthur Andersen?). The quality of the graphic
seems excellent, certainly good enough to make up fake bills for your
next sex party.
I have been planning for months to make available some flashcards with
Khmer characters and/or phrases, but keep running into little
difficulties. Last night, for instance, it turns out that Open Office
*does* trap some of the "US-International" keycodes, eg ctrl-alt-A.
Also, several pieces of software have no option for trimming the top
and bottom leading (you have to print Khmer characters at 36 points to
make the diacritics semi-legible, but this usually means huge amounts
of white space). These problems don't seem to *me* to amount to something
I should exploit to assert copyright ownership on the material (if and
when I publish it), but maybe I'm wrong.
The madness of crowds and flocking theory
It's frequently been remarked that people in crowds seem to become
willing to do things they would never do singly: beat a policeman
to death, hold up cigarette lighters while singing off-key, etc.
This corresponds to an observation I made before: when a decision
is extremely complex but obviously important, people default to
doing what the people they can see are doing.
One example of that was in the Monty Python sketch where Hitler and
the other leaders of the Nazi party have somehow found refuge in