|
About How this site is organized and what it's for Weblog start pageThe start page contains the most recent 15 articles. Home pageThe main home page of my website, not my weblog. Currently not used. ------------------ Articles by month Click here to get all the articles for a particular month. This month's articles (if any) Current month Today's articles (if any) Articles dated 2008/12/03 only ------------------ Subtopics ------------------
Site map
Search for text on this site
You may have to use search if I move files around! Listing of all articles by date
Flavours There's more than one way to view this weblog; these links display the current page in other formats. External links These are a few of my favourite sites. T E S T Slashdot yesterday Copyright © 2003-2007 Alternate Worlds Publishing, Boston MA USA Wenhua dageming de zhongyao jiaoxun shi bixu fandui geren mixin If I have been able to see further, it is because I am surrounded by midgets. Never ascribe to stupidity that which can adequately be explained by malice. "Your argument's repugnant and intriguing." "That's kinda my thing." |
Danny's WeblogOpinionsSince this is a vanity site, you could call everything "opinions". I guess I wanted to give people some indication that this section has more controversial stuff: the sort of thing one is encouraged not to discuss at a dinner party because the guests will come to blows. You should be aware of the following hints on navigation:
Was the invasion of Iraq stupid, or brilliantly successful?As I've said before, there are two theories of history, either of which can explain anything: conspiracy, and stupidity. For a long time, the liberal media have presented the actions of the USA as merely stupid: supporting tyrants, eliminating centrist politicians and movements, etc. I believed that too: at the time of the Vietnam War, I supported what I believed were the intentions of the USA, while opposing most of its actions as extremely unlikely to have the "desired" consequences. I no longer believe it. I believe that the war in Iraq, and indeed the 9/11 disaster, were specifically planned to have all the results that have taken place: the utter destruction of the US Army, the isolation of the USA from the remaining members of the free world, the appallingly dangerous reliance of the economy on China's forbearance... Here's someone who agrees with me: [http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/november2005/291105frogcooked.htm] The police state in the USA is itself, I believe, just a means to an end: the destruction of the USA's economy and civil structure. Creating a torture-based army and a police state are intended to destroy the army and eliminate popular support for Congress. Hurricane Katrina was just an excuse to have foreign troops pointing guns at US citizens on US soil: it won't be the last time. The same website as above has an article on the interesting 1980s movie "Red Dawn", in which the Soviets and Cubans (not I think Mexicans as the article suggests) invade part of the USA. The article stresses the analogy between the US resistance in the movie and the Iraqi resistance to the US today. I think the relevance of the movie to current events will soon beccome much more acute. [http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/november2005/281105reddawn.htm] But *wny* does the USA's elite *want* to destroy the USA? I see it as another version of the Depression. In the Depression, the Federal Reserve encouraged banks to make unsafe loans, and then abruptly cut off the money supply. The result was that the American middle class, which had been watching its investments grow predictably, was suddenly faced with unemployment, and needed to cash in its investments when eveyrbody else was doing the same thing. The super-rich, easily able to ride out the storm, were able to buy up investments for pennies on the dollar. And the middle class – not to mention the ravaged, starving working class – were chastened by poverty and war, and were easily led away from their real enemy. The same thing is going to happen, but it may well be that the super-rich have simply made some sort of deal with the Red Chinese (not so damned red any more), and there will just be a net transfer of all of the USA's wealth to Peking. (Then Thaksin's strategy of turning Thailand into a vacation resort area of China may pay off too.) Debug: hittotal: 18 startban: 0 dancookie: endbandate: 2008-12-03 banned: 0 tempdate: 2008-12-03 tert: jse: jsno jsh: 18 |
||||