|
About How this site is organized and what it's for Weblog start pageThe start page contains the most recent 15 articles. Home pageThe main home page of my website, not my weblog. Currently not used. ------------------ Articles by month Click here to get all the articles for a particular month. This month's articles (if any) Current month Today's articles (if any) Articles dated 2008/12/03 only ------------------ Subtopics ------------------
Site map
Search for text on this site
You may have to use search if I move files around! Listing of all articles by date
Flavours There's more than one way to view this weblog; these links display the current page in other formats. External links These are a few of my favourite sites. T E S T Slashdot yesterday Copyright © 2003-2007 Alternate Worlds Publishing, Boston MA USA Wenhua dageming de zhongyao jiaoxun shi bixu fandui geren mixin If I have been able to see further, it is because I am surrounded by midgets. Never ascribe to stupidity that which can adequately be explained by malice. "Your argument's repugnant and intriguing." "That's kinda my thing." |
Danny's Weblog2003 Aug 27 [ Wed ]My solution to the spam problem1. SMTP servers are reconfigured so that instead of sending the entirety of a user's email, they send only a short notification, ie a standard mail header followed by a body which consists of only a hyperlink to the content. The content itself is stored on a webserver local to the SMTP server. 2. The link is just some large number – large enough to provide security so that nobody who doesn't get the notification can guess the number and read the mail. 3. Advantages: -1. Doesn't require much if any reconfiguration for most users -2. Straightforward implementation at the server end -3. Doesn't require a trusted third party (unlike public key schemes etc; no need to deal with Verisign ik-thoo) -4. Even if the spammer sends mail, it's relatively small (only a header, say 1 kB) -5. All emails have to be traceable to a website -6. All other emails (ie larger than a header) can be quietly dropped -7. Unwanted email (that mailing list you can't be bothered to unsubscribe from, the uncle who keeps forwarding long unfunny jokes, etc etc) doesn't waste bandwidth 4. Disadvantages -1. A pain for people like me who still read email in a text client -2. Would allow spammers to send *many more* emails, because they would be shorter. -3. The sender can always detect when the mail is received. Clearly this solution is going to be imperfect initially. But quite soon, because it forces spammers to provide a traceable website address, it would make law enforcement much easier. Debug: hittotal: 1 startban: 0 dancookie: endbandate: 2008-12-03 banned: 0 tempdate: 2008-12-03 tert: jse: jsx jsh: 1 |
||||