|
Greetings,
Here's our opinion on the use of a backstaff.
We couldn't find a picture of a backstaff or any period reference to one. In order to pass the charge, you'll have to include some evidence that the backstaff is a period instrument. It would help us to hear what documentation you found as well.
You shouldn't have to worry about fine line heraldry problems--sticks are thin, but they are reasonable charges. If you put two or more crossbars on the backstaff, you should be safe from conflict against crosses, especially if you can put some kind of mark (such as measuring ticks) which clearly identifies the backstaff as a tool. Period depictions often exaggerated distinctive elements of charges, so it would be reasonable to draw a backstaff with large measuring ticks (for example). It would be most logical to draw the backstaff as it would appear if you were holding it in front of you.
A number of our members suggested that you look at using a different navigational tool in your arms. It sounds as though the backstaff will be difficult to draw and identify, and you may well be better off using a more easily identified charge. There are numerous examples of medieval tools that are unidentifiable to modern researchers, but you may have practical difficulties using a backstaff.
Rouland Carre, Arval D'Espas Nord, and Alison Macdermot contributed to this letter.
We hope this has been helpful. If you need any further assistance, please let us know.
In service,
Alan Fairfax
Academy of S. Gabriel