ACADEMY OF SAINT GABRIEL REPORT 1671 http://www.s-gabriel.org/1671 ************************************ From: "Brian M. Scott" 21 Mar 1999 Greetings from the Academy of S. Gabriel! You wanted to combine the given (first) name with some form of the surname to produce an English feminine name authentic for the period 1300-1450 but weren't sure just how this should be done. Specifically, you asked whether you should use , , , or yet some other combination. is an excellent choice: it is very well attested throughout your period. [1] is originally a place-name; there are places with this name in the counties of Northumberland, Staffordshire, and Yorkshire West Riding. and , both recorded in Yorkshire in 1379, probably came originally from the last of these places, whose name was recorded as as early as 1166. This same spelling was used in 1256 for the Northumberland place-name. Finally, in 1601 the surname was recorded as . [2, 3, 4] >From these data we conclude that and would both be authentic 14th century names. As the early citations of the place-name suggest, is the likelier spelling at the beginning of your period. This is because the <-stan> comes from Old English 'stone', which only gradually became in the different dialects. It was especially slow to change in the North of England, where two of the three places with this name are found. After about 1400 it's fairly unusual to find the proposition, and we'd expect to see or instead. We did not find any period examples of the modern spelling and cannot recommend that form, especially as early as 1450. We did find the place-name spelled , but only in the 12th century, so we don't recommend using it in your period. [3, 5] We did find a citation 1332; this shows that at least in some dialects the modern spelling <-stone> was possible as early as the 14th century. [5] Thus, it's likely that is a reasonable spelling for the last century or so of your period. In short, is a wonderfully authentic 14th century name. is also a good choice for the 14th century, but it's not quite as good a choice as , especially for the first half of the century. After 1400 or so either or be suitable, and it's likely that would as well. I hope that this quick letter has been useful. If you have any further questions, please don't hesitate to write us again. For the Academy, Talan Gwynek 20 March 1999 ===== [1] Talan Gwynek. 'Feminine Given Names in _A Dictionary of English Surnames_' (SCA: KWHS Proceedings, 1994; WWW: J. Mittleman, 1997); s.n. Emma. http://www.panix.com/~mittle/names/reaney/ [2] Bardsley, Charles W. A Dictionary of English and Welsh Surnames (Baltimore: Genealogical Publishing Company, 1980); s.n. Featherston. [3] Ekwall, Eilert. The Concise Oxford Dictionary of English Place-names, 4th ed. (New York: Oxford University Press, 1989); s.n. Featherstone. [4] Hitching, F.K. & S. Hitching. References to English Surnames in 1601 (Walton-on-Thames: Chas. A. Bernau, 1910); p. xxxv. [5] Reaney, P.H. & R.M. Wilson. A Dictionary of English Surnames (London: Routledge, 1991); s.nn. Featherston, Whitestone.