ACADEMY OF SAINT GABRIEL REPORT 2004 http://www.s-gabriel.org/2004 ************************************ From: "Brian M. Scott" 6 Apr 2000 Greetings from the Academy of S. Gabriel! You asked whether the name <Jesmond Black> was suitable for a late-period female English persona. In particular, you asked whether Withycombe is correct in suggesting that <Jesmond> may be a late-period form of <Ismena> and whether <Black> would be an appropriate surname. You mentioned that you were also considering the surnames <Smith> and <Hunt>. Although we have not actually found period examples of <Jesmond>, we have no reason to doubt Withycombe's statement that it occurred in North Lancashire in the 16th - 18th centuries. [1] Our sources for late-period English names are far from complete, and none of them covers that region. Whether the name is actually a form of <Ismena> is another question altogether. Withycombe's suggestion is very tentative, and the required sound changes are so extensive that we are inclined to suspect that <Jesmond> has some other origin. The surname <Black> has to be discussed in connection with the surname <Blake>. In Middle English there were two words spelled <blake>; one meant 'black', and the other meant 'pale, wan'. Often these words can be distinguished only by context, and sometimes not even then. [2] Both gave rise to nicknames that later became the hereditary surnames <Black> and <Blake>, but it seems likely that in most cases the modern surnames go back to the word for 'black'. [3] Both spellings (or minor variants) are found in the Middle Ages (e.g., <Reyner le Blake> 1273 and <Edericke le Blacke> 1273), but <Blake> was much the more common medieval spelling. [4] This disparity continued well beyond the end of our period. In 1601 the surname <Black> was recorded in only one English parish register, while <Blake> was recorded in eight, and a fairly comprehensive survey of 17th century records found 467 instance of <Blake> to only 88 of <Black>. [5, 6] Though we have no doubt that it was then in use, we were unable to find a 16th century citation for the exact form <Black>. We did find the form in 1601, and we found the minor variant <Blacke> in 1577. [5, 7] On that basis we think that <Jesmond Blacke> or <Black> is an uncommon but authentic late-period name, at least in North Lancashire; <Jesmond Blake> appears to be a somewhat likelier variant of the same name. Forms of the surnames <Smith> and <Hunt> were common in the 16th century. In 1601 the surname <Smith> was recorded in the registers of 52 English parishes, <Smyth> in 32, <Smythe> in 24, and <Smithe> in 22. The spelling <Smythe> was especially frequent in Lancashire and Yorkshire and would therefore go well with the North Lancashire name <Jesmond>. <Hunt> and <Hunte> were recorded in 14 and nine parishes, respectively. [8] Any of these forms would be suitable surnames. Aryanhwy merch Catmael and Maridonna Benvenuti also contributed to this letter. We hope that it has been helpful; if you have any further questions, please don't hesitate to write again. For the Academy, Talan Gwynek 6 April 2000 ===== References and Notes: [1] Withycombe, E.G. The Oxford Dictionary of English Christian Names, 3rd ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988); s.n. Ismen(i)a. [2] The Compact Edition of the Oxford English Dictionary (New York: Oxford University Press, 1973); s.vv. black, blake. [3] Reaney, P. H., & R. M. Wilson. A Dictionary of English Surnames (London: Routledge, 1991; Oxford University Press, 1995); s.n. Black. [4] Bardsley, Charles W. A Dictionary of English and Welsh Surnames (Baltimore: Genealogical Publishing Company, 1980); s.n. Black. [5] Hitching, F.K. & S. Hitching. References to English Surnames in 1601 (Walton-on-Thames: Chas. A. Bernau, 1910); p. xxiii. [6] Rogers, Colin D. The Surname Detective (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1995); p. 138. [7] Mari Elspeth nic Bryan (Kathleen M. O'Brien). 'Name Distribution in King's Stanley Marriages: 1573-1600' (WWW: J. Mittleman, 1999). http://www.panix.com/~mittle/names/mari/kingsstanley/ [8] Hitching & Hitching, op. cit., pp. lxi, xliv.