*** 19920923.txt Sat Feb 16 10:33:40 2002 --- 19930917.txt Sat Feb 16 10:33:45 2002 *************** *** 1,20 **** ! From: tale@uunet.uu.net (David C Lawrence) ! Newsgroups: news.announce.newusers,news.groups,news.admin,news.announce.newgroups,news.answers Subject: How to Create a New Usenet Newsgroup ! Message-ID: ! Date: 19 Oct 92 05:15:29 GMT ! Expires: 18 Dec 92 17:15:25 GMT ! Sender: spaf@cs.purdue.EDU ! Reply-To: tale@uunet.uu.net (David C Lawrence) Followup-To: news.newusers.questions ! Lines: 151 ! Approved: spaf@cs.purdue.EDU ! Supersedes: Archive-name: creating-newsgroups/part1 Original-author: woods@ncar.ucar.edu (Greg Woods) ! Last-change: 23 Sep 1992 by spaf@cs.purdue.edu (Gene Spafford) GUIDELINES FOR USENET GROUP CREATION --- 1,27 ---- ! From: tale@rodan.UU.NET (David C Lawrence) ! Newsgroups: news.announce.newusers,news.groups,news.admin.misc,news.announce.newgroups,news.answers Subject: How to Create a New Usenet Newsgroup ! Supersedes: Followup-To: news.newusers.questions ! Date: 24 Sep 1993 17:01:14 -0400 ! Organization: UUNET Technologies Inc, Falls Church, VA, USA ! Lines: 162 ! Approved: tale@uunet.uu.net ! Expires: 24 Nov 93 09:01:12 GMT ! Message-ID: ! NNTP-Posting-Host: rodan.uu.net ! Summary: creating new groups in comp, misc, news, rec, sci, soc, or talk Archive-name: creating-newsgroups/part1 Original-author: woods@ncar.ucar.edu (Greg Woods) ! Comment: enhanced & edited until 5/93 by spaf@cs.purdue.edu (Gene Spafford) ! Last-change: 17 Sep 1993 by tale@uunet.uu.net ! ! [[ Special note: a proposal for major updates to this document should ! be out in the not very distant future. In the meantime a major ! change has been made in this document with regard to handling of ! the vote. ]] GUIDELINES FOR USENET GROUP CREATION *************** *** 48,54 **** the Followup-to: header will be set so that the actual discussion takes place only in news.groups. Users on sites which have difficulty posting to moderated groups may mail submissions intended for news.announce.newgroups ! to announce-newgroups@uunet.uu.net. The article should be cross-posted among the newsgroups, including news.announce.newgroups, rather than posted as separate articles. Note that --- 55,61 ---- the Followup-to: header will be set so that the actual discussion takes place only in news.groups. Users on sites which have difficulty posting to moderated groups may mail submissions intended for news.announce.newgroups ! to newgroups@uunet.uu.net. The article should be cross-posted among the newsgroups, including news.announce.newgroups, rather than posted as separate articles. Note that *************** *** 72,77 **** --- 79,89 ---- The Vote + Currently, the use of the Usenet Volunteer Votetakers (UVV) is strongly + advocated for all newsgroup proposals. Ron Dippold + co-ordinates this group. Contact him to arrange the handling of the vote. + The mechanics of vote will be handled in accord with the paragraphs below. + 1) AFTER the discussion period, if it has been determined that a new group is really desired, a name and charter are agreed upon, and it has been determined whether the group will be moderated and if so who will *************** *** 155,162 **** 4) The newgroup message will be sent by the news.announce.newgroups moderator at the end of the waiting period of a successful vote. If the new group is moderated, the vote-taker should send a message during the waiting period to ! Gene Spafford and David C. Lawrence with ! both the moderator's contact address and the group's submission address. 5) A proposal which has failed under point (3) above should not again be brought up for discussion until at least six months have passed from the --- 167,174 ---- 4) The newgroup message will be sent by the news.announce.newgroups moderator at the end of the waiting period of a successful vote. If the new group is moderated, the vote-taker should send a message during the waiting period to ! David C. Lawrence with both the moderator's contact ! address and the group's submission address. 5) A proposal which has failed under point (3) above should not again be brought up for discussion until at least six months have passed from the