{"id":175896,"date":"2020-10-31T18:14:00","date_gmt":"2020-10-31T23:14:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/2020\/10\/31\/the-timber-industry-lies\/"},"modified":"2020-10-31T18:14:00","modified_gmt":"2020-10-31T23:14:00","slug":"the-timber-industry-lies","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/2020\/10\/31\/the-timber-industry-lies\/","title":{"rendered":"The Timber Industry Lies"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>  A study of logging shows that   <a href=\"https:\/\/www.propublica.org\/article\/despite-what-the-logging-industry-says-cutting-down-trees-isnt-stopping-catastrophic-wildfires\">logging does not prevent wildfires<\/a>. <\/p>\n<p>  The argument has always been that private, and more heavily logged, forests   are less prone to wildfires. <\/p>\n<p>An extensive study has shown this to be false:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>  <span style=\"color: #2b00fe;\">As thousands of Oregon homes burned to rubble last month, the state\u2019s     politicians joined the timber industry in blaming worsening wildfires on the     lack of logging. <\/p>\n<p>\u2026\u2026\u2026 <\/p>\n<p>In the decades since government     restrictions reduced logging on federal lands, the timber industry has     promoted the idea that private lands are less prone to wildfires, saying     that forests thick with trees fuel bigger, more destructive blazes. But an     analysis by OPB and ProPublica shows last month\u2019s fires burned as intensely     on private forests with large-scale logging operations as they did, on     average, on federal lands that cut fewer trees.<\/p>\n<p>In fact, private     lands that were clear-cut in the past five years, with thousands of trees     removed at once, burned slightly hotter than federal lands, on average. On     public lands, areas that were logged within the past five years burned with     the same intensity as those that hadn\u2019t been cut, according to the analysis.     <\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe belief people have is that somehow or another we can thin     our way to low-intensity fire that will be easy to suppress, easy to     contain, easy to control. Nothing could be further from the truth,\u201d said     Jack Cohen, a retired U.S. Forest Service scientist who pioneered research     on how homes catch fire. <\/p>\n<p>The timber industry has sought to     <a href=\"https:\/\/olis.leg.state.or.us\/liz\/2019R1\/Downloads\/CommitteeMeetingDocument\/179669\">frame logging as the alternative to catastrophic wildfires<\/a>    through advertising, legislative lobbying and attempts to undermine research     that has shown forests burn more severely under industrial management,     according to documents obtained by OPB, The Oregonian\/OregonLive and     ProPublica. <\/p>\n<p>\u2026\u2026\u2026<\/p>\n<p>  \u201cThat kind of management clearly didn\u2019t provide community protection,\u201d   said Dunn, who spent eight years as a wildland firefighter. He now studies   fire behavior and risk for Oregon State University and the Forest Service.<\/p>\n<p>In   2018, Dunn co-authored a study with Humboldt State University\u2019s Harold Zald   that found the 2013 Douglas Complex Fire in southern Oregon burned 30% more   severely on private industrial timber plantations than on federal forestlands. <\/p>\n<p><\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>The way to protect forest from catastrophic wildfires is more fires, whether naturally occurring or prescribed burns, period, full stop.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>The movement for thinning is timber industry propaganda.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A study of logging shows that logging does not prevent wildfires. The argument has always been that private, and more heavily logged, forests are less prone to wildfires. An extensive study has shown this to be false: As thousands of Oregon homes burned to rubble last month, the state\u2019s politicians joined the timber industry in &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[365,484],"class_list":["post-175896","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","tag-business","tag-environment"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/175896"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=175896"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/175896\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=175896"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=175896"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=175896"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}