{"id":177085,"date":"2020-01-01T20:28:00","date_gmt":"2020-01-02T01:28:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/2020\/01\/01\/oh-snap-8\/"},"modified":"2020-01-01T20:28:00","modified_gmt":"2020-01-02T01:28:00","slug":"oh-snap-8","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/2020\/01\/01\/oh-snap-8\/","title":{"rendered":"Oh Snap!"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/a>Donald Trump’s stacked environmental science review panel just reported that the White House’s rollback of environmental regulations lacks proper justification<\/a>:<\/p>\n

A top panel of government-appointed scientists, many of them hand-selected by the Trump administration, said on Tuesday that three of President Trump\u2019s most far-reaching and scrutinized proposals to weaken major environmental regulations are at odds with established science.<\/p>\n

Draft letters posted online Tuesday<\/a> by the Environmental Protection Agency\u2019s Scientific Advisory Board, which is responsible for evaluating the scientific integrity of the agency\u2019s regulations, took aim at the Trump administration\u2019s rewrite of an Obama-era regulation of waterways<\/a>, an Obama-era effort to curb planet-warming vehicle tailpipe emissions <\/a>and a plan to limit scientific data that can be used to draft health regulations. <\/a><\/p>\n

In each case, the 41 scientists on a board \u2014 many of whom were appointed by Trump administration officials to replace scientists named by the Obama administration \u2014 found the regulatory changes flew in the face of science.<\/p>\n

\u2026\u2026\u2026<\/p>\n

Legal experts said the advisory body\u2019s opinion could undermine the Trump administration\u2019s rollbacks in the courts. \u201cThe courts basically say if you\u2019re going to ignore the advice of your own experts you have to have really good reasons for that,\u201d said Patrick Parenteau, a professor of law with the Vermont Law School. \u201cAnd not just policy reasons but reasons that go to the merits of what the critiques are saying.\u201d<\/p>\n

Many scientists on the advisory board were selected by Trump administration officials early in the administration, as President Trump sought to move forward with an aggressive agenda of weakening environmental regulations. During the first year of the Trump administration, more than a quarter of the academic scientists on the panel departed or were dismissed<\/a>, and many were replaced by scientists with industry ties who were perceived as likely to be more friendly to the industries that the E.P.A. regulates.<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

This crew can’t even set up a biased jury right.<\/p>\n

It’s both pathetic and reassuring.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Donald Trump’s stacked environmental science review panel just reported that the White House’s rollback of environmental regulations lacks proper justification: A top panel of government-appointed scientists, many of them hand-selected by the Trump administration, said on Tuesday that three of President Trump\u2019s most far-reaching and scrutinized proposals to weaken major environmental regulations are at odds …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[469,484,588,437],"class_list":["post-177085","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","tag-bureaucracy","tag-environment","tag-fail","tag-regulation"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/177085"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=177085"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/177085\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=177085"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=177085"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=177085"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}