{"id":178100,"date":"2019-03-07T19:32:00","date_gmt":"2019-03-08T00:32:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/2019\/03\/07\/how-can-you-tell-if-mark-zuckerberg-is-lying\/"},"modified":"2019-03-07T19:32:00","modified_gmt":"2019-03-08T00:32:00","slug":"how-can-you-tell-if-mark-zuckerberg-is-lying","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/2019\/03\/07\/how-can-you-tell-if-mark-zuckerberg-is-lying\/","title":{"rendered":"How can you tell if Mark Zuckerberg is lying?"},"content":{"rendered":"<div>That&#8217;s easy.<\/div>\n<p>You can tell that he is lying if his lips are moving.<\/p>\n<p>As such, I am highly dubious of any promise that makes, particularly if <a href=\"https:\/\/theintercept.com\/2019\/03\/06\/facebook-mark-zuckerberg-privacy\/\">he is promising enhanced privacy<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><span style=\"color: blue;\">If you click enough times through the website of Saudi Aramco, the largest oil producer in the world, you\u2019ll reach a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.saudiaramco.com\/en\/making-a-difference\/planet\/climateinitiative\">quiet section<\/a> called \u201cAddressing the climate challenge.\u201d In this part of the website, the fossil fuel monolith claims, \u201cOur contributions to the climate challenge are tangible expressions of our ethos, supported by company policies, of conducting our business in a way that addresses the climate challenge.\u201d This is meaningless, of course \u2014 as is the announcement <a href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/notes\/mark-zuckerberg\/a-privacy-focused-vision-for-social-networking\/10156700570096634\/\">Mark Zuckerberg<\/a> made today about his newfound \u201cprivacy-focused vision for social networking.\u201d Don\u2019t be fooled by either. <\/p>\n<p>\u2026\u2026\u2026 <\/p>\n<p>And so here we are: \u201cAs I think about the future of the internet, I believe a privacy-focused communications platform will become even more important than today\u2019s open platforms,\u201d Zuckerberg writes in his road-to-Damascus revelation about personal privacy. The roughly 3,000-word manifesto reads as though Facebook is fundamentally realigning itself as a privacy champion \u2014 a company that will no longer track what you read, buy, see, watch, and hear in order to sell companies the opportunity to intervene in your future acts. But, it turns out, the new \u201cprivacy-focused\u201d Facebook involves only one change: the enabling of end-to-end encryption across the company\u2019s instant messaging services. Such a tech shift would prevent anyone, even Facebook, outside of chat participants from reading your messages. <\/p>\n<p>That\u2019s it.<\/p>\n<p>Although the move is laudable \u2014 and will be a boon for dissident  Facebook chatters in countries where government surveillance is a real,  perpetual risk \u2014 promising to someday soon forfeit to your ability to  eavesdrop on over 2 billion people&nbsp;doesn\u2019t exactly make you eligible for  sainthood in 2019. It doesn\u2019t help that Zuckerberg\u2019s post is completely  absent of details beyond a plan to implement these encryption changes  \u201cover the next few years\u201d \u2014 which is particularly silly considering  Facebook <a href=\"https:\/\/www.buzzfeednews.com\/article\/ryanmac\/facebook-privacy-optics-clear-history-zuckerberg\">has yet to implement<\/a> privacy features promised in the wake of its previous mega-scandals.<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Not only has Zuckerberg issued similar <i>mea culpas<\/i> over the years, he has done so on something resembling an annual basis.<\/p>\n<p>These promises have never correlated to meaningful changes in behavior.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>That&#8217;s easy. You can tell that he is lying if his lips are moving. As such, I am highly dubious of any promise that makes, particularly if he is promising enhanced privacy: If you click enough times through the website of Saudi Aramco, the largest oil producer in the world, you\u2019ll reach a quiet section &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[365,364,387,598,533],"class_list":["post-178100","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","tag-business","tag-evil","tag-hypocrisy","tag-social-media","tag-software"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/178100"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=178100"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/178100\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=178100"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=178100"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=178100"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}