{"id":178244,"date":"2019-01-29T21:46:00","date_gmt":"2019-01-30T02:46:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/2019\/01\/29\/oh-snap-13\/"},"modified":"2019-01-29T21:46:00","modified_gmt":"2019-01-30T02:46:00","slug":"oh-snap-13","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/2019\/01\/29\/oh-snap-13\/","title":{"rendered":"Oh, Snap!"},"content":{"rendered":"
The Illinois Supreme Court just reversed a state appeals court decision, and said that 6-Flags amusement park is liable for collecting biometric data<\/a>, specifically fingerprints.<\/div>\n

This may not sound like a big deal, but it also means that companies like Facebook and Google are liable as well:<\/p>\n

The Illinois Supreme Court<\/a> on Friday upheld consumers\u2019 right to sue companies for collecting data like fingerprint or iris scans without telling them how it will be used \u2014 a ruling that could have widespread implications for tech giants like Facebook<\/a> and Google<\/a>.<\/p>\n

The unanimous ruling came in a lawsuit filed against Six Flags Entertainment Corp. by the family of a teenager whose fingerprint data was collected in 2014 when he bought a season pass to Great America, the company\u2019s Gurnee amusement park. The lawsuit alleged violation of the 2008 Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act, which has gained attention as biometric data are increasingly used for tasks such as tagging photos on social media and clocking in at work.<\/p>\n

The law requires companies collecting information such as facial, fingerprint and iris scans to obtain prior consent from consumers or employees, detailing how they\u2019ll use the data and how long the records will be kept. It also allows private citizens to sue, while other states let only the attorney general bring a lawsuit.<\/p>\n

Here’s why Facebook and Google care.<\/p>\n

The Illinois Supreme Court on Friday ruled unanimously against Six Flags Entertainment Corp. in a lawsuit filed by the family of a teenager whose fingerprint data was collected in 2014 when he bought a season pass. (Mark Kodiak Ukena\/Lake County News-Sun)
Ally MarottiContact ReporterChicago Tribune
Privacy Policy<\/p>\n

The Illinois Supreme Court on Friday upheld consumers\u2019 right to sue companies for collecting data like fingerprint or iris scans without telling them how it will be used \u2014 a ruling that could have widespread implications for tech giants like Facebook and Google.<\/p>\n

The unanimous ruling came in a lawsuit filed against Six Flags Entertainment Corp. by the family of a teenager whose fingerprint data was collected in 2014 when he bought a season pass to Great America, the company\u2019s Gurnee amusement park. The lawsuit alleged violation of the 2008 Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act, which has gained attention as biometric data are increasingly used for tasks such as tagging photos on social media and clocking in at work.<\/p>\n

The law requires companies collecting information such as facial, fingerprint and iris scans to obtain prior consent from consumers or employees, detailing how they\u2019ll use the data and how long the records will be kept. It also allows private citizens to sue, while other states let only the attorney general bring a lawsuit.<\/p>\n

The opinion, which overturns an appeals court ruling in favor of Six Flags, has the potential to effect biometrics lawsuits playing out in courtrooms across the country. Defendants in those cases, including Facebook, have argued that individuals shouldn\u2019t have the right to sue if no real damage occurred after they handed over their biometric information. But the state Supreme Court ruled that violation of the law is damage enough.<\/p>\n

\u201cThis is no mere \u2018technicality,\u2019 \u201d as the appellate court suggested, Chief Justice Lloyd Karmeier wrote in the opinion. \u201cThe injury is real and significant.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u2026\u2026\u2026<\/p>\n

The Illinois law is one of the strictest in the nation and has turned the state into a hotbed of lawsuits over alleged misuses of biometric data. Privacy experts say protecting that type of information is critical because, unlike a credit card or bank account number, it\u2019s permanent.<\/p>\n

Besides Facebook, companies across a wide range of industries \u2014 from other tech giants such as Google, Snapchat and Shutterfly to Chicago-based United Airlines, grocery company Roundy\u2019s and InterContinental Hotels\u2019 Kimpton chain \u2014 have faced allegations in Illinois involving improper use of biometrics.<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Indeed.<\/p>\n

There was already one bill being mooted to emasculate the Illinois law<\/a>, and I expect to see more of that, along with federal court challenges, because, after all, there is money to be made and campaign donations to be made.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The Illinois Supreme Court just reversed a state appeals court decision, and said that 6-Flags amusement park is liable for collecting biometric data, specifically fingerprints. This may not sound like a big deal, but it also means that companies like Facebook and Google are liable as well: The Illinois Supreme Court on Friday upheld consumers\u2019 …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[407,449,366],"class_list":["post-178244","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","tag-justice","tag-legislation","tag-privacy"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/178244"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=178244"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/178244\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=178244"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=178244"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=178244"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}