{"id":179123,"date":"2018-05-09T18:10:00","date_gmt":"2018-05-09T23:10:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/2018\/05\/09\/at-least-they-wiill-be-on-record\/"},"modified":"2018-05-09T18:10:00","modified_gmt":"2018-05-09T23:10:00","slug":"at-least-they-wiill-be-on-record","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/2018\/05\/09\/at-least-they-wiill-be-on-record\/","title":{"rendered":"At Least They Wiill Be On Record"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Democrats have managed to <a href=\"https:\/\/techcrunch.com\/2018\/05\/09\/senators-file-to-force-vote-on-disapproval-of-fccs-new-net-neutrality-rules\/\">force a motion of disapproval of the FCC&#8217;s repeal of net neutrality<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>I do not expect it to pass, but forcing the Republicans to line up in favor of Comcast and AT&amp;T is horrible politics for the &#8216;Phants:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><span style=\"color: blue;\">The Democratic push to restore net neutrality took another step today with the official filing of a petition, under the Congressional Review Act, to force a vote on whether to repeal the FCC\u2019s unpopular new rules. The effort may be <a href=\"https:\/\/techcrunch.com\/2017\/12\/21\/theres-no-magic-bullet-for-reversing-the-fccs-net-neutrality-decision\/\">doomed<\/a> in the end, but it\u2019s still extremely important. <\/p>\n<p>The CRA is a way of reversing rules recently instated by federal agencies; it\u2019s simple and effective, though, until this administration, rarely used (but they made up for lost time, all right). Its expedited process and low bar to entry \u2014 only 30 senators are needed to bring a vote, and the vote generally happens quite quickly \u2014 have made it an ideal tool for Congress to undo Obama-era regulations, but the shoe is on the other foot now. <\/p>\n<p>Democrats in the Senate are using the CRA as a potential method of removing the rules the FCC voted for in December and returning to 2015\u2019s Open Internet Order and strong net neutrality rules. Today they filed the actual petition to force the vote.<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p><span style=\"color: blue;\">\u2026\u2026\u2026 <\/span><br \/><span style=\"color: blue;\"><br \/><\/span><span style=\"color: blue;\">Right now there are 50 senators supporting the measure, including one Republican. The Democrats are hoping to make this issue extremely visible in order to put pressure on other, perhaps undecided, Republicans who might cross the aisle with enough prodding from their constituency.<\/p>\n<p>As I\u2019ve written before, and as Senators themselves have admitted, the chance of this actually rolling back the rules is low, since it would have to also pass through the House, where Democrats are at a more serious disadvantage, then be signed by the president, which is unlikely, to say the least.<\/p>\n<p>But by forcing a vote, they force everyone in the Senate to take a position for or against the rules, including those who have attempted to stay \u201cneutral\u201d through silence.<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>This is actually something that Democrats can run on, that is both good policy and good politics.&nbsp; (Net neutrality is favored by Republicans by something like 2 to 1.)<\/p>\n<p>More of this.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Democrats have managed to force a motion of disapproval of the FCC&#8217;s repeal of net neutrality. I do not expect it to pass, but forcing the Republicans to line up in favor of Comcast and AT&amp;T is horrible politics for the &#8216;Phants: The Democratic push to restore net neutrality took another step today with the &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[447,367,449,374,437],"class_list":["post-179123","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","tag-congress","tag-internet","tag-legislation","tag-politics","tag-regulation"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/179123"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=179123"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/179123\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=179123"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=179123"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=179123"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}