{"id":179735,"date":"2017-11-12T20:44:00","date_gmt":"2017-11-13T01:44:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/2017\/11\/12\/read-harold-feld\/"},"modified":"2017-11-12T20:44:00","modified_gmt":"2017-11-13T01:44:00","slug":"read-harold-feld","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/2017\/11\/12\/read-harold-feld\/","title":{"rendered":"Read Harold Feld"},"content":{"rendered":"
He is a lawyer for the Public Knowledge, which advocates for, “Policies that serve the public interest.”<\/div>\n

He lives and breaths this stuff, and he has looked at the merger between AT&T and Time Warner, and the rumored remedies that the US Department of Justice is demanding, and concludes that the remedies demanded by the government<\/a>, including requiring a divestiture of CNN, have extensive precedent and are reasonable in the context of the industry:<\/p>\n

I want to start by applauding Randal Stephenson for coming out quickly and denying the rumors that DoJ asked them to sell CNN as the price of getting the merger done<\/a>. At the same time, however, he acknowledged that negotiations were \u201ccomplicated,\u201d and that he and recently confirmed Asst A.G. for Antitrust Makan Delrahim were still \u201cgetting to know each other\u201d and \u201cfigure out the ask on the other side of the table.\u201d He also made it clear that, if DoJ does challenge, AT&T is prepared to go to court and are confident they will win. <\/p>\n

AT&T is generally pretty good at persuading everyone that DoJ doesn\u2019t really have a case against them. As folks may recall, despite the fact that the proposed AT&T\/T-Mo transaction violated just about every basic tenant of existing antitrust law<\/a>, AT&T managed to convince everyone for the longest time that DoJ was just playing hardball with them<\/a> and didn\u2019t really mean it because DoJ didn\u2019t really have a case. While Stephenson refused to discuss what was negotiated, the rumors suggest it was a demand to divest either DIRECTV or the Turner Broadcasting cable channels (which include CNN, as well as TNT, HBO and a bunch of other real popular programming<\/a>.) Once again, you have antitrust experts who do not have any particular experience with cable mergers shaking their heads and predicting that DoJ has no case. <\/p>\n

In fact, demanding divestiture of either the must have content or the DIRECTV distribution platform is precisely the remedy you would expect if you believe the deal presents significant harm because of the vertical integration issues. That\u2019s been the position of my employer, Public Knowledge, which has opposed the transaction since AT&T announced the deal<\/a>. (That predates Trump\u2019s election, for those of you wondering.) If you want a more detailed understanding of the theory of the harms, you can find it in my boss Gene Kimmelman\u2019s testimony to Congress here<\/a>. While generally true that vertical deals are hard to challenge, the cable industry has long been something of an exception, and the remedy here is similar to what the FTC imposed on the AT&T\/Turner deal in 1996<\/a>, where the FTC imposed stock divestitures and restructuring to eliminate the voting interest of John Malone and Liberty Media because of Malone\/Liberty\u2019s ownership TCI, which was then the largest cable operator in the United States (25% national market share). Given the massive criticism of \u201cbehavioral\u201d remedies and a call to return to \u201cstructural\u201d remedies <\/a>from the right and the left, it\u2019s unsurprising that DoJ would want actual divestiture rather than go the Comcast\/NBCU consent decree route.<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

I would add that consent decrees tend to have limited effect over the long run, and that Public Knowledge has opposed this merger since before Trump’s election.<\/p>\n

While a lot of people have tried to cast opposition to the deal as political interference by Trump and his Evil Minions\u2122<\/sup>, it is clear that opposition could be easily justified.<\/p>\n

This might be another case of a stopped clock being right twice a day, or it might be a vendetta by Donald Trump. <\/p>\n

Just don’t jump to conclusions yet.<\/p>\n

Read the rest.
<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

He is a lawyer for the Public Knowledge, which advocates for, “Policies that serve the public interest.” He lives and breaths this stuff, and he has looked at the merger between AT&T and Time Warner, and the rumored remedies that the US Department of Justice is demanding, and concludes that the remedies demanded by the …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[365,470,464,367,479,437],"class_list":["post-179735","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","tag-business","tag-communications","tag-good-writing","tag-internet","tag-monopoly","tag-regulation"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/179735"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=179735"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/179735\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=179735"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=179735"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=179735"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}