{"id":180321,"date":"2017-05-24T16:29:00","date_gmt":"2017-05-24T21:29:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/2017\/05\/24\/it-looks-like-russian-intelligence-made-jim-comey-its-bitch\/"},"modified":"2017-05-24T16:29:00","modified_gmt":"2017-05-24T21:29:00","slug":"it-looks-like-russian-intelligence-made-jim-comey-its-bitch","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/2017\/05\/24\/it-looks-like-russian-intelligence-made-jim-comey-its-bitch\/","title":{"rendered":"It Looks Like Russian Intelligence Made Jim Comey Its Bitch"},"content":{"rendered":"

It appears that much of the Comey’s strategy and pronouncements were driven by documents that had been forged by elements of the Russian state security apparatus<\/a>:<\/p>\n

A secret document that officials say played a key role in then-FBI Director James B. Comey\u2019s handling of the Hillary Clinton email investigation has long been viewed within the FBI as unreliable and possibly a fake, according to people familiar with its contents.<\/span>

<\/span>In the midst of the 2016 presidential primary season, the FBI received what was described as a Russian intelligence document claiming a tacit understanding between the Clinton campaign and the Justice Department over the inquiry into whether she intentionally revealed classified information through her use of a private email server.<\/span>

<\/span>The Russian document cited a supposed email describing how then-Attorney General Loretta E. Lynch had privately assured someone in the Clinton campaign that the email investigation would not push too deeply into the matter. If true, the revelation of such an understanding would have undermined the integrity of the FBI\u2019s investigation.<\/span>

<\/span>Current and former officials have said that Comey relied on the document in making his July decision to announce on his own, without Justice Department involvement, that the investigation was over. That public announcement \u2014 in which he criticized Clinton and made extensive comments about the evidence \u2014 set in motion a chain of other FBI moves that Democrats now say helped Trump win the presidential election.<\/span>

<\/span>But according to the FBI\u2019s own assessment, the document was bad intelligence \u2014 and according to people familiar with its contents, possibly even a fake sent to confuse the bureau. The Americans mentioned in the Russian document insist they do not know each other, do not speak to each other and never had any conversations remotely like the ones described in the document. Investigators have long doubted its veracity, and by August the FBI had concluded it was unreliable.<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

There is NO ONE<\/b> who comes off well on this entire matter:<\/p>\n