{"id":180406,"date":"2017-04-27T19:23:00","date_gmt":"2017-04-28T00:23:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/2017\/04\/27\/but-of-course-6\/"},"modified":"2017-04-27T19:23:00","modified_gmt":"2017-04-28T00:23:00","slug":"but-of-course-6","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/2017\/04\/27\/but-of-course-6\/","title":{"rendered":"But of Course"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>It turns out that the Australian bureaucracy created to collect fees for content creators <a href=\"https:\/\/www.techdirt.com\/articles\/20170426\/02091437240\/australias-copyright-agency-keeps-11-million-meant-authors-uses-it-to-fight-introduction-fair-use.shtml\">has been diverting these fees to lobby against changes in their copyright laws<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><span style=\"color: blue;\">Even though stories of copyright collecting societies failing to  distribute the monies that they collect to artists abound &#8212; we wrote  about <a href=\"https:\/\/www.techdirt.com\/articles\/20170321\/03154736962\/more-financial-scandals-involving-collecting-society-remind-me-again-why-they-are-credible-representatives-artists.shtml\">one<\/a>  just a few weeks ago &#8212; this doesn&#8217;t seem to discourage others from  continuing to bend the rules somewhat. Here, for example, is a story  from Australia, where there is a major battle to switch to a US-style <a href=\"https:\/\/www.techdirt.com\/articles\/20160429\/18014234315\/australian-govt-commission-copyright-is-copywrong-hurting-public-needs-to-be-fixed.shtml\">fair use<\/a>  approach to copyright. Naturally, the affected industries there hate  the idea of allowing the public a little more leeway in the use of  copyright materials. So Australia&#8217;s copyright collection agency decided  to build up a war-chest to lobby against such changes. The Sydney  Morning Herald explains <a href=\"http:\/\/www.smh.com.au\/federal-politics\/political-news\/copyright-agency-diverts-funds-meant-for-authors-to-15m-fighting-fund-20170420-gvol0w.html\">where the money for that fighting fund is coming from<\/a>: <\/span><br \/><span style=\"color: blue;\">  <\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote><p><span style=\"color: blue;\"><i>  Australia&#8217;s government-mandated copyright collection agency has been  diverting payments intended for journalists and authors to a [$11  million] &#8220;future fund&#8221; to fight changes to the law. <br \/><\/i><\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><span style=\"color: blue;\"> Specifically, the monies come from payments made by educational establishments in order to use <a href=\"https:\/\/www.techdirt.com\/blog\/?tag=orphan+works\">orphan works<\/a>.  That&#8217;s a major change of the agency&#8217;s policy that was not disclosed to  the Australian government&#8217;s Productivity Commission that oversees this  area: <\/span><br \/><span style=\"color: blue;\"> <i> <\/i><\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote><p><i><span style=\"color: blue;\"> [The Copyright Agency] has been criticised in a Productivity Commission  review that is before the government over the transparency of its  accounts and its practice of retaining, rather than returning, millions  of dollars collected from schools and universities on behalf of the  owners of &#8220;orphan works&#8221; who can&#8217;t be traced.<\/span><\/i><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>This reinforces a point that I have made on numerous occasions: IP protections are government subsidies through the enforcement of monopoly rents, and are justified only to the degree that they encourage the creation of protected works.<\/p>\n<p>Any amount in excess of this results in parasitic rent seeking, because this is the most effective way to make <b>EVEN MORE<\/b> money.<\/p>\n<p>Copyright and patent have gone from a way to &#8220;To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts,&#8221; to a mechanism that corrupts the political process and hinders progress.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>It turns out that the Australian bureaucracy created to collect fees for content creators has been diverting these fees to lobby against changes in their copyright laws: Even though stories of copyright collecting societies failing to distribute the monies that they collect to artists abound &#8212; we wrote about one just a few weeks ago &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[474,520,368,364,428],"class_list":["post-180406","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","tag-australia-and-new-zealand","tag-copyright","tag-corruption","tag-evil","tag-ip"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/180406"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=180406"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/180406\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=180406"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=180406"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=180406"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}