{"id":180550,"date":"2017-03-17T19:54:00","date_gmt":"2017-03-18T00:54:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/2017\/03\/17\/the-oxford-comma-bitches-it-just-works\/"},"modified":"2017-03-17T19:54:00","modified_gmt":"2017-03-18T00:54:00","slug":"the-oxford-comma-bitches-it-just-works","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/2017\/03\/17\/the-oxford-comma-bitches-it-just-works\/","title":{"rendered":"The Oxford Comma, Bitches, It Just Works"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n
on the one hand I love the #oxfordcomma<\/a>, on the other hand these sentences truly are SO GOOD pic.twitter.com\/Gst0OSY0Wo<\/a><\/div>\n

\u2014 Jules (@scuttling) March 6, 2017<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

<\/div>\n

There is a dispute in linguistic circles as to whether or not you should the Oxford comma, which is the comma used by some before the,”And,” of the last item of a list.<\/p>\n

If you use the Oxford comma, you write, “I love my parents, Lady Gaga, and Humpty Dumpty” and if you eschew this convention, \u201cI love my parents, Lady Gaga and Humpty Dumpty.”<\/p>\n

To my mind, the latter form strongly states that your parents are Lady Gaga and Humpty Dumpty, so I am, and likely always will be, a strong supporter of the Oxford (aka serial) comma.<\/p>\n

Well, it appears that a judge in Maine agrees with me, ruling that an employer is liable for overtime pay for their truckers because of a missing comma<\/a>:<\/p>\n

Never let it be said that punctuation doesn\u2019t matter.<\/span>

<\/span> In Maine, the much-disputed Oxford comma has helped a group of dairy drivers in a dispute with a company about overtime pay.<\/span>

<\/span> The Oxford comma is used before the words \u201cand\u201d or \u201cor\u201d in a list of three or more things. Also known as the serial comma, its aficionados say it clarifies sentences in which things are listed. <\/span>

<\/span> \u2026\u2026\u2026<\/span>

<\/span> In a judgment that will delight Oxford comma enthusiasts everywhere, a US court of appeals sided with delivery drivers for Oakhurst Dairy because the lack of a comma made part of Maine\u2019s overtime laws too ambiguous.<\/span>

<\/span> The state\u2019s law says the following activities do not count for overtime pay:<\/span><\/p>\n

The canning, processing, preserving, freezing, drying, marketing, storing, packing for shipment or distribution of:<\/span>

<\/span> (1) Agricultural produce;<\/span>
(2) Meat and fish products; and<\/span>
(3) Perishable foods.<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

The drivers argued, due to a lack of a comma between \u201cpacking for shipment\u201d and \u201cor distribution\u201d, the law refers to the single activity of \u201cpacking\u201d, not to \u201cpacking\u201d and \u201cdistribution\u201d as two separate activities. As the drivers distribute \u2013 but do not pack \u2013 the goods, this would make them eligible for overtime pay.<\/span>

<\/span> Previously, a district court had ruled in the dairy company\u2019s favour, who argued that the legislation \u201cunambiguously\u201d identified the two as separate activities exempt from overtime pay. But the appeals judge sided with the drivers.<\/span>

<\/span> Circuit judge David J. Barron wrote:<\/span><\/p>\n

We conclude that the exemption\u2019s scope is actually not so clear in this regard. And because, under Maine law, ambiguities in the state\u2019s wage and hour laws must be construed liberally in order to accomplish their remedial purpose, we adopt the drivers\u2019 narrower reading of the exemption.<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/blockquote>\n

The AP REALLY<\/b> needs to rewrite its style guide on this matter.<\/p>\n

I’m sure that Merle Haggard’s wives would agree.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

on the one hand I love the #oxfordcomma, on the other hand these sentences truly are SO GOOD pic.twitter.com\/Gst0OSY0Wo \u2014 Jules (@scuttling) March 6, 2017 There is a dispute in linguistic circles as to whether or not you should the Oxford comma, which is the comma used by some before the,”And,” of the last item …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[450,407,465,515,437,584],"class_list":["post-180550","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","tag-employment","tag-justice","tag-labor","tag-language","tag-regulation","tag-win"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/180550"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=180550"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/180550\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=180550"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=180550"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=180550"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}