{"id":180760,"date":"2017-01-11T19:45:00","date_gmt":"2017-01-12T00:45:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/2017\/01\/11\/this-and-president-mike-pence\/"},"modified":"2017-01-11T19:45:00","modified_gmt":"2017-01-12T00:45:00","slug":"this-and-president-mike-pence","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/2017\/01\/11\/this-and-president-mike-pence\/","title":{"rendered":"This \u2026\u2026\u2026 And President Mike Pence"},"content":{"rendered":"

Glenn Greenwald has a very good point here: As loathsome as Donald Trump is, there is no cause to cheer an effort by the US State Security Apparatus to engage what can only be called a soft coup against him<\/a>:<\/p>\n

In January, 1961, Dwight Eisenhower delivered his farewell address<\/a> after serving two terms as U.S. president; the five-star general chose to warn Americans of this specific threat to democracy: \u201cIn the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist.\u201d That warning was issued prior to the decade long escalation of the Vietnam War, three more decades of Cold War mania, and the post-9\/11 era, all of which radically expanded that unelected faction\u2019s power even further.<\/span>

<\/span> This is the faction that is now engaged in open warfare against the duly elected and already widely disliked<\/a> president-elect, Donald Trump. They are using classic Cold War dirty tactics and the defining ingredients of what has until recently been denounced as \u201cFake News.\u201d<\/span>

<\/span> Their most valuable instrument is the U.S. media, much of which reflexively reveres, serves, believes, and sides with hidden intelligence officials. And Democrats, still reeling from their unexpected and traumatic election loss as well as a systemic collapse of their party<\/a>, seemingly divorced further and further from reason with each passing day, are willing \u2014 eager<\/i> \u2014 to embrace any claim, cheer any tactic, align with any villain, regardless of how unsupported, tawdry and damaging those behaviors might be.<\/span>

<\/span> The serious dangers posed by a Trump presidency are numerous and manifest. There are a wide array of legitimate and effective tactics for combatting those threats: from bipartisan congressional coalitions and constitutional legal challenges to citizen uprisings and sustained and aggressive civil disobedience. All of those strategies have periodically proven themselves effective in times of political crisis or authoritarian overreach.<\/span>

<\/span> But cheering for the CIA<\/i> and its shadowy allies to unilaterally subvert the U.S. election and impose its own policy dictates on the elected president is both warped and self-destructive. Empowering the very entities that have produced the most shameful atrocities and systemic deceit over the last six decades is desperation of the worst kind. Demanding that evidence-free, anonymous assertions be instantly venerated as Truth \u2014 despite emanating from the very precincts designed to propagandize and lie \u2014 is an assault on journalism, democracy, and basic human rationality. And casually branding domestic adversaries who refuse to go along as traitors and disloyal foreign operatives is morally bankrupt and certain to backfire on those doing it.<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

If the US state security apparatus is behind this, it is indicates a part of our bureaucracy is out of control and a clear and present danger to both our democracy and out civil rights.<\/p>\n

There is, however, another possibility, which Greenwald obliquely alludes to:<\/p>\n

There is a real danger here that this maneuver can harshly backfire, to the great benefit of Trump and to the great detriment of those who want to oppose him. If any of the significant claims in this \u201cdossier\u201d turn out to be provably false \u2014 such as Cohen\u2019s trip to Prague \u2014 many people will conclude, with Trump\u2019s encouragement, that large media outlets (CNN and BuzzFeed) and anti-Trump factions inside the government (CIA) are deploying \u201cFake News\u201d to destroy him. In the eyes of many people, that will forever discredit \u2014 render impotent \u2014 future journalistic expos\u00e9s that are based on actual, corroborated wrongdoing.<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

This is pretty clearly what Karl Rove did to CBS with GW Bush’s going AWOL from his responsibilities at the Air National Guard.<\/p>\n

He floated out the story, Rather got fired, and Shrub’s draft dodging was permanently removed as a viable news story. <\/p>\n

You create a story, it blows up, and then you point out a few seemingly-minor-but-obvious-in-retrospect-flaws, and you discredit any reporting in that vein for the next few years. (As an historical aside, Karl Rove once bugged his own campaign offices<\/b> to get control of the news cycle in a campaign, so this is very much in the bag of tricks of both Republican campaign operatives and the GRU.)<\/p>\n

I’m kind of hoping it’s the latter, because if it is the former, we are very close to a 7 Days in May<\/i> scenario.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Glenn Greenwald has a very good point here: As loathsome as Donald Trump is, there is no cause to cheer an effort by the US State Security Apparatus to engage what can only be called a soft coup against him: In January, 1961, Dwight Eisenhower delivered his farewell address after serving two terms as U.S. …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[792,791,793,762,779,405],"class_list":["post-180760","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","tag-bureaucracy","tag-civil-rights","tag-conspiracy","tag-donald-trump","tag-espionage","tag-presidential-campaign"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/180760"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=180760"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/180760\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=180760"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=180760"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=180760"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}