{"id":180978,"date":"2016-11-08T17:39:00","date_gmt":"2016-11-08T22:39:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/2016\/11\/08\/not-the-onion-6\/"},"modified":"2016-11-08T17:39:00","modified_gmt":"2016-11-08T22:39:00","slug":"not-the-onion-6","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/2016\/11\/08\/not-the-onion-6\/","title":{"rendered":"Not The Onion"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>In attempting defend their antiabortion law, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.esquire.com\/news-politics\/politics\/news\/a49762\/kansas-dred-scott\/\">the Kansas Solicitor General has cited <i>Dred Scott v. Sanford<\/i><\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><span style=\"color: blue;\">The question of what&#8217;s the matter with Kansas has become even deeper and darker since Governor Sam Brownback completed his project of turning the entire state into a lab rat for bad economic theories, and since the state elected Kris Kobach, the big daddy of voter-suppression\u2014and of demanding that brown people carry their papers at all times\u2014to be its secretary of state. But now the state&#8217;s Solicitor General, Steven McAllister, is getting into the act in a spectacular way.<\/span><br \/><span style=\"color: blue;\"><br \/><\/span><span style=\"color: blue;\">\u2026\u2026\u2026<\/span><br \/><span style=\"color: blue;\"><br \/><\/span><span style=\"color: blue;\">We now present a <a href=\"http:\/\/theusconstitution.org\/sites\/default\/files\/Hodes-Nauser-III-KSC-Response-Brief-to-ACLU-amicus-10-18-final.pdf\">portion of the latter brief<\/a>.<\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote><p><span style=\"color: blue;\">Courts across the country have recognized that &#8220;[t]he Declaration of Independence is a statement of ideals, not law.&#8221; Schifanelli v. U.S. Gov&#8217;t, 1988 WL 138496, at *1 (4th Cir. Dec. 22, 1988). See also Swepi, LP v. Mora Cty., N.M., 81 F. Supp. 3d 1075, 1172 (D.N.M. 2015) (same); Minyard v. Walsh, 2014 WL 1029835, at *4 (C.D. Cal. Mar. 17, 2014) (&#8220;Claim 4&#8217;s assertion of a violation of Plaintiff&#8217;s rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness is not cognizable. Those principles, described in the Declaration of Independence, do not guarantee enforceable rights.&#8221;); Black v. Simpson, 2008 WL 544458, at *2 (W.D. Ky. Feb. 27, 2008) (&#8220;There is no private right of action to enforce the Declaration of Independence.&#8221;); Borzych v. Frank, 2006 WL 3254497, at *8 (W.D. Wis. Nov. 9, 2006) (&#8220;the Declaration of Independence is not binding law&#8221;); Coffey v. United States, 939 F. Supp. 185, 191 (E.D.N.Y.1996) (&#8220;While the Declaration of Independence states that all men are endowed certain unalienable rights including &#8216;Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness,&#8217; it does not grant rights that may be pursued through the judicial system.&#8221;). See also <b>Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393, 407 (1856)<\/b>\u2026<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><span style=\"color: blue;\"><br \/><\/span><span style=\"color: blue;\">Wait. What was that again?<\/span><br \/><span style=\"color: blue;\"><br \/><\/span><span style=\"color: blue;\">S<b>ee also Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393, 407 (1856)\u2026<\/b><\/span><br \/><span style=\"color: blue;\"><br \/><\/span><span style=\"color: blue;\">Holy cow. The state of Kansas has a lawyer citing Dred Scott in support of its position. In defense of a law aimed at limiting a woman&#8217;s right to choose. What in the fck is the matter with Kansas?<\/span><br \/><span style=\"color: blue;\"><br \/><\/span><span style=\"color: blue;\">Dred Freaking Scott!<\/span><br \/><span style=\"color: blue;\"><br \/><\/span><span style=\"color: blue;\">I am not a lawyer, nor am I a legal scholar, although I do function as one here in the shebeen. But there&#8217;s a nice shiny nickel for anyone who can tell me the last time anyone cited that monstrous ruling in support of anything. Jesus, these people.<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>(<i>emphasis original<\/i>)<\/p>\n<p>This is f%$#ed up and sh%$.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In attempting defend their antiabortion law, the Kansas Solicitor General has cited Dred Scott v. Sanford: The question of what&#8217;s the matter with Kansas has become even deeper and darker since Governor Sam Brownback completed his project of turning the entire state into a lab rat for bad economic theories, and since the state elected &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[883,766,798,833,816,824],"class_list":["post-180978","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","tag-abortion","tag-evil","tag-history","tag-justice","tag-stupid","tag-wanker"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/180978"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=180978"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/180978\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=180978"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=180978"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=180978"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}