{"id":181179,"date":"2016-09-11T18:40:00","date_gmt":"2016-09-11T23:40:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/2016\/09\/11\/why-putin-favors-an-orange-clown\/"},"modified":"2016-09-11T18:40:00","modified_gmt":"2016-09-11T23:40:00","slug":"why-putin-favors-an-orange-clown","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/2016\/09\/11\/why-putin-favors-an-orange-clown\/","title":{"rendered":"Why Putin Favors an Orange Clown"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Clinton Ehrlich, the, &#8220;Sole Western researcher at the Russian Foreign Ministry\u2019s Moscow State Institute of International Relations,&#8221; observes that <a href=\"https:\/\/foreignpolicy.com\/2016\/09\/07\/the-kremlin-really-believes-that-hillary-clinton-will-start-a-war-with-russia-donald-trump-vladimir-putin\/\">the Russian political establishment honestly believes that Hillary Clinton wants to start a war with Russia<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>I don&#8217;t have the direct exposure to the Russian foreign policy establishment, but his assessment of their position rings true to me, not the least because I see Clinton&#8217;s foreign policy record as showing her to be bellicose in general,&nbsp; and implacably hostile to Russia specifically:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><span style=\"color: blue;\">If Hillary Clinton is elected president, the world will remember Aug. 25 as the day she began the Second Cold War.<\/span><br \/><span style=\"color: blue;\"><br \/><\/span><span style=\"color: blue;\">In a speech last month nominally about Donald Trump, Clinton called Russian President Vladimir Putin the godfather of right-wing, extreme nationalism. To Kremlin-watchers, those were not random epithets. Two years earlier, in the most famous address of his career, Putin accused the West of backing an armed seizure of power in Ukraine by \u201cextremists, nationalists, and right-wingers.\u201d Clinton had not merely insulted Russia\u2019s president: She had done so in his own words.<\/span><br \/><span style=\"color: blue;\"><br \/><\/span><span style=\"color: blue;\">Worse, they were words originally directed at neo-Nazis. In Moscow, this was seen as a reprise of Clinton\u2019s comments comparing Putin to Hitler. It injected an element of personal animus into an already strained relationship \u2014 but, more importantly, it set up Putin as the representative of an ideology that is fundamentally opposed to the United States.<\/span><br \/><span style=\"color: blue;\"><br \/><\/span><span style=\"color: blue;\">\u2026\u2026\u2026<\/span><br \/><span style=\"color: blue;\"><br \/><\/span><span style=\"color: blue;\">I have been hard-pressed to offer a more comforting explanation for Clinton\u2019s behavior \u2014 a task that has fallen to me as the sole Western researcher at the Russian Foreign Ministry\u2019s Moscow State Institute of International Relations. Better known by its native acronym, MGIMO, the institute is the crown jewel of Russia\u2019s national-security brain trust, which Henry Kissinger dubbed the \u201cHarvard of Russia.\u201d<\/span><br \/><span style=\"color: blue;\"><br \/><\/span><span style=\"color: blue;\">\u2026\u2026\u2026<\/span><br \/><span style=\"color: blue;\"><br \/><\/span><span style=\"color: blue;\">Let\u2019s not mince words: Moscow perceives the former secretary of state as an existential threat. The Russian foreign-policy experts I consulted did not harbor even grudging respect for Clinton. The most damaging chapter of her tenure was the NATO intervention in Libya, which Russia could have prevented with its veto in the U.N. Security Council. Moscow allowed the mission to go forward only because Clinton had promised that a no-fly zone would not be used as cover for regime change.<\/span><br \/><span style=\"color: blue;\"><br \/><\/span><span style=\"color: blue;\">Russia\u2019s leaders were understandably furious when, not only was former Libyan President Muammar al-Qaddafi ousted, but a cellphone recording of his last moments showed U.S.-backed rebels sodomizing him with a bayonet. They were even more enraged by Clinton\u2019s videotaped response to the same news: \u201cWe came, we saw, he died,\u201d the secretary of state quipped before bursting into laughter, cementing her reputation in Moscow as a duplicitous warmonger.<\/span><br \/><span style=\"color: blue;\"><br \/><\/span><span style=\"color: blue;\">As a candidate, Clinton has given Moscow d\u00e9j\u00e0 vu by once again demanding a humanitarian no-fly zone in the Middle East \u2014 this time in Syria. Russian analysts universally believe that this is another pretext for regime change. Putin is determined to prevent Syrian President Bashar al-Assad from meeting the same fate as Qaddafi \u2014 which is why he has deployed Russia\u2019s air force, navy, and special operations forces to eliminate the anti-Assad insurgents, many of whom have received U.S. training and equipment.<\/span><br \/><span style=\"color: blue;\"><br \/><\/span><span style=\"color: blue;\">\u2026\u2026\u2026<\/span><br \/><span style=\"color: blue;\"><br \/><\/span><span style=\"color: blue;\">Another factor that disturbs Russian analysts is the fact that, unlike prior hawks such as John McCain, Clinton is a Democrat. This has allowed her to mute the West\u2019s normal anti-interventionist voices, even as Iraq-war architect Robert Kagan boasts that Clinton will pursue a neocon foreign policy by another name. Currently, the only voice for rapprochement with Russia is Clinton\u2019s opponent, Donald Trump. If she vanquishes him, she will have a free hand to take the aggressive action against Russia that Republican hawks have traditionally favored.<\/span><br \/><span style=\"color: blue;\"><br \/><\/span><span style=\"color: blue;\">Moscow prefers Trump not because it sees him as easily manipulated, but because his \u201cAmerica First\u201d agenda coincides with its view of international relations. Russia seeks a return to classical international law, in which states negotiate with one another based on mutually understood self-interests untainted by ideology. To Moscow, only the predictability of realpolitik can provide the coherence and stability necessary for a durable peace.<\/span><br \/><span style=\"color: blue;\"><br \/><\/span><span style=\"color: blue;\">\u2026\u2026\u2026<\/span><br \/><span style=\"color: blue;\"><br \/><\/span><span style=\"color: blue;\">In Clinton, it sees the polar opposite \u2014 a progressive ideologue who will stubbornly adhere to moral postures regardless of their consequences. Clinton also has financial ties to George Soros, whose Open Society Foundations are considered the foremost threat to Russia\u2019s internal stability, based on their alleged involvement in Eastern Europe\u2019s prior \u201cColor Revolutions.\u201d<\/span><br \/><span style=\"color: blue;\"><br \/><\/span><span style=\"color: blue;\">Russia\u2019s security apparatus is certain that Soros aspires to overthrow Putin\u2019s government using the same methods that felled President Viktor Yanukovych in Ukraine: covertly orchestrated mass protests concealing armed provocateurs. The Kremlin\u2019s only question is whether Clinton is reckless enough to back those plans.<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>I have one difference with this analysis:&nbsp; The evidence shows that the coup in the Ukraine was more directly funded by the CIA (and its front the National Endowment for Democracy) and the State Department, not Soros.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Clinton Ehrlich, the, &#8220;Sole Western researcher at the Russian Foreign Ministry\u2019s Moscow State Institute of International Relations,&#8221; observes that the Russian political establishment honestly believes that Hillary Clinton wants to start a war with Russia. I don&#8217;t have the direct exposure to the Russian foreign policy establishment, but his assessment of their position rings true &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[815,807,823,809],"class_list":["post-181179","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","tag-foreign-relations","tag-hillary-clinton","tag-presidential-campaign","tag-russia"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/181179"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=181179"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/181179\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=181179"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=181179"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=181179"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}