{"id":181803,"date":"2016-03-13T18:30:00","date_gmt":"2016-03-13T23:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/2016\/03\/13\/why-trump-might-become-president\/"},"modified":"2016-03-13T18:30:00","modified_gmt":"2016-03-13T23:30:00","slug":"why-trump-might-become-president","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/2016\/03\/13\/why-trump-might-become-president\/","title":{"rendered":"Why Trump Might Become President"},"content":{"rendered":"

For all of his bombast, Thomas Franks notes that Donald Trump has a serious and real position on trade that is unique amongst his Republican compatriots<\/a>, specifically he is the only one who talks against the current regime of free trade fetishism that is the Washington Consensus.<\/p>\n

Over the past 50 years, there has been a trajectory towards greater trade liberalization, along with a massive expansion in property rights and rents.<\/p>\n

Ordinary Americans note that this has made their lives, and the lives of their children, measurably worse.<\/p>\n

The V<\/b><\/u>ery S<\/b><\/u>erious P<\/b><\/u>eople (VSPs) among our elites argue that in the long run we will benefit, but it’s been over 2 generations with poor results, and as John Maynard Keynes said, “In the long run, we are all dead.”<\/p>\n

The VSPs maintain that it is all racism.  It’s something more significant than that: <\/p>\n

\u2026\u2026\u2026<\/span>

<\/span>Or so we\u2019re told. Last week, I decided to watch several hours of Trump speeches for myself. I saw the man ramble and boast and threaten and even seem to gloat when protesters were ejected from the arenas in which he spoke. I was disgusted by these things, as I have been disgusted by Trump for 20 years. But I also noticed something surprising. In each of the speeches I watched, Trump spent a good part of his time talking about an entirely legitimate issue, one that could even be called leftwing.<\/span>

<\/span>Yes, Donald Trump talked about trade. In fact, to judge by how much time he spent talking about it, trade may be his single biggest concern \u2013 not white supremacy. Not even his plan to build a wall along the Mexican border, the issue that first won him political fame. He did it again during the debate on 3 March: asked about his political excommunication by Mitt Romney, he chose to pivot and talk about \u2026 trade.<\/span>

<\/span>It seems to obsess him: the destructive free-trade deals our leaders have made, the many companies that have moved their production facilities to other lands, the phone calls he will make to those companies\u2019 CEOs in order to threaten them with steep tariffs unless they move back to the US.<\/span>

<\/span>Trump embellished this vision with another favorite leftwing idea: under his leadership, the government would \u201cstart competitive bidding in the drug industry\u201d. (\u201cWe don\u2019t competitively bid!\u201d he marveled \u2013 another true fact, a legendary boondoggle brought to you by the George W Bush administration.) Trump extended the critique to the military-industrial complex, describing how the government is forced to buy lousy but expensive airplanes thanks to the power of industry lobbyists.<\/span>

<\/span>Or so we\u2019re told. Last week, I decided to watch several hours of Trump speeches for myself. I saw the man ramble and boast and threaten and even seem to gloat when protesters were ejected from the arenas in which he spoke. I was disgusted by these things, as I have been disgusted by Trump for 20 years. But I also noticed something surprising. In each of the speeches I watched, Trump spent a good part of his time talking about an entirely legitimate issue, one that could even be called leftwing.<\/span>

<\/span>Yes, Donald Trump talked about trade. In fact, to judge by how much time he spent talking about it, trade may be his single biggest concern \u2013 not white supremacy. Not even his plan to build a wall along the Mexican border, the issue that first won him political fame. He did it again during the debate on 3 March: asked about his political excommunication by Mitt Romney, he chose to pivot and talk about \u2026 trade.<\/span>

<\/span>It seems to obsess him: the destructive free-trade deals our leaders have made, the many companies that have moved their production facilities to other lands, the phone calls he will make to those companies\u2019 CEOs in order to threaten them with steep tariffs unless they move back to the US.<\/span>

<\/span>Trump embellished this vision with another favorite leftwing idea: under his leadership, the government would \u201cstart competitive bidding in the drug industry\u201d. (\u201cWe don\u2019t competitively bid!\u201d he marveled \u2013 another true fact, a legendary boondoggle brought to you by the George W Bush administration.) Trump extended the critique to the military-industrial complex, describing how the government is forced to buy lousy but expensive airplanes thanks to the power of industry lobbyists.<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

The most frightening thing about Donald Trump is that he is the best Republican on the issues, not his demagoguery.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

For all of his bombast, Thomas Franks notes that Donald Trump has a serious and real position on trade that is unique amongst his Republican compatriots, specifically he is the only one who talks against the current regime of free trade fetishism that is the Washington Consensus. Over the past 50 years, there has been …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[970,963,1002,1016,1003,977],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-181803","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-corruption","category-donald-trump","category-good-writing","category-international-commerce","category-philosophy","category-presidential-campaign"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/181803"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=181803"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/181803\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=181803"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=181803"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=181803"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}