{"id":181805,"date":"2016-03-12T20:11:00","date_gmt":"2016-03-13T01:11:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/2016\/03\/12\/this-reads-like-something-from-joseph-hellers-most-famous-novel\/"},"modified":"2016-03-12T20:11:00","modified_gmt":"2016-03-13T01:11:00","slug":"this-reads-like-something-from-joseph-hellers-most-famous-novel","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/2016\/03\/12\/this-reads-like-something-from-joseph-hellers-most-famous-novel\/","title":{"rendered":"This Reads Like Something from Joseph Heller’s Most Famous Novel*"},"content":{"rendered":"

It appears that whistleblower protection legislation cannot apply to the FBI because there would be too many whistleblowers<\/a>:<\/p>\n

The Department of Justice is undercutting Chuck Grassley\u2019s efforts to provide FBI employees whistleblower protection. That became clear in an exchange (2:42<\/a>) on Wednesday.<\/span>

<\/span>The exchange disclosed two objections DOJ has raised to Grassley\u2019s FBI Whistleblower Protect Act<\/a>. First, as Attorney General Loretta Lynch revealed, DOJ is worried that permitting FBI Agents to report crimes or waste through their chain of command<\/i> would risk exposing intelligence programs.<\/span><\/p>\n

What I would say is that as we work through this issue, please know that, again, any concerns that the Department raises are not out of a disagreement with the point of view of the protection of whistleblowers but again, just making sure that the FBI\u2019s intelligence are also protected at the same time<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

I suspect (though am looking for guidance) that the problem may be that the bill permits whistleblowers to go to any member of Congress, rather than just ones on the Intelligence Committees. It\u2019s also possible that DOJ worries whistleblowers will be able to go to someone senior to them, but not read into a given program.<\/span>

<\/span>Still, coming from an agency that doesn\u2019t adequately report things like its National Security Letter usage to Congress, which has changed its reporting to the Intelligence Oversight Board so as to exempt more activities, and can\u2019t even count its usage of other intelligence programs, it seems like a tremendous problem that DOJ doesn\u2019t want FBI whistleblowers to have protection because it might expose what FBI is doing on intelligence.<\/span>

<\/span>That\u2019s sort of the point!<\/span>

<\/span>Especially given Grassley\u2019s other point: apparently, DOJ is opposed to the bill because it will elicit too many complaints.<\/span><\/p>\n

One of the issues that your department has raised is that allowing FBI employees to report wrong-doing to their chain of command could lead to too many complaints. You know? What\u2019s wrong with too many complaints? \u2026 Seems to me you\u2019d invite every wrong doing to get reported to somebody so it could get corrected.<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n


<\/span>Apparently, DOJ knows there are so many problems FBI employees would like to complain about that things would grind to a halt if they were actually permitted to complain.<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

We cannot protect whistleblowers, because they might whistleblow.<\/p>\n

This does seem to be rather Helleresque, doesn’t it?<\/p>\n

*<\/sup>Catch-22<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

It appears that whistleblower protection legislation cannot apply to the FBI because there would be too many whistleblowers: The Department of Justice is undercutting Chuck Grassley\u2019s efforts to provide FBI employees whistleblower protection. That became clear in an exchange (2:42) on Wednesday.The exchange disclosed two objections DOJ has raised to Grassley\u2019s FBI Whistleblower Protect Act. …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[970,972,1041,1020,1103],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-181805","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-corruption","category-justice","category-law-enforcement-misconduct","category-legislation","category-secrecy"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/181805"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=181805"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/181805\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=181805"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=181805"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=181805"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}