{"id":182211,"date":"2015-11-19T19:41:00","date_gmt":"2015-11-20T00:41:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/2015\/11\/19\/the-new-york-times-calls-out-intelligence-officials-for-exploiting-the-paris-attacks-to-further-their-anti-privacy-agenda\/"},"modified":"2015-11-19T19:41:00","modified_gmt":"2015-11-20T00:41:00","slug":"the-new-york-times-calls-out-intelligence-officials-for-exploiting-the-paris-attacks-to-further-their-anti-privacy-agenda","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/2015\/11\/19\/the-new-york-times-calls-out-intelligence-officials-for-exploiting-the-paris-attacks-to-further-their-anti-privacy-agenda\/","title":{"rendered":"The New York Times Calls Out Intelligence Officials for Exploiting the Paris Attacks to Further their Anti-Privacy Agenda"},"content":{"rendered":"

Seeing as how the Times<\/i> is the very much the voice of the conventional wisdom, so when they have excoriated intelligence officials’ opportunistic statements following the Paris attacks<\/a>, it implies that there has been a shift in customary thinking:<\/p>\n

It\u2019s a wretched yet predictable ritual after each new terrorist attack: Certain politicians and government officials waste no time exploiting the tragedy for their own ends. The remarks on Monday by John Brennan, the director of the Central Intelligence Agency, took that to a new and disgraceful low.<\/span>

<\/span>Speaking less than three days after coordinated terrorist attacks in Paris killed 129 and injured hundreds more, Mr. Brennan complained about \u201ca lot of hand-wringing over the government\u2019s role in the effort to try to uncover these terrorists.\u201d<\/span>

<\/span>What he calls \u201chand-wringing\u201d was the sustained national outrage following the 2013 revelations by Edward Snowden, a former National Security Agency contractor, that the agency was using provisions of the Patriot Act to secretly collect information on millions of Americans\u2019 phone records. In June, President Obama signed the USA Freedom Act, which ends bulk collection of domestic phone data by the government (but not the collection of other data, like emails and the content of Americans\u2019 international phone calls) and requires the secretive Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court to make its most significant rulings available to the public.<\/span>
These reforms are only a modest improvement on the Patriot Act, but the intelligence community saw them as a grave impediment to antiterror efforts. In his comments Monday, Mr. Brennan called the attacks in Paris a \u201cwake-up call,\u201d and claimed that recent \u201cpolicy and legal\u201d actions \u201cmake our ability collectively, internationally, to find these terrorists much more challenging.\u201d<\/span>

<\/span>It is hard to believe anything Mr. Brennan says. Last year, he bluntly denied that the C.I.A. had illegally hacked into the computers of Senate staff members conducting an investigation into the agency\u2019s detention and torture programs when, in fact, it did. In 2011, when he was President Obama\u2019s top counterterrorism adviser, he claimed that American drone strikes had not killed any civilians, despite clear evidence that they had. And his boss, James Clapper Jr., the director of national intelligence, has admitted lying to the Senate on the N.S.A.\u2019s bulk collection of data. Even putting this lack of credibility aside, it\u2019s not clear what extra powers Mr. Brennan is seeking.<\/span>

<\/span>\u2026\u2026\u2026<\/span>

<\/span>These reforms are only a modest improvement on the Patriot Act, but the intelligence community saw them as a grave impediment to antiterror efforts. In his comments Monday, Mr. Brennan called the attacks in Paris a \u201cwake-up call,\u201d and claimed that recent \u201cpolicy and legal\u201d actions \u201cmake our ability collectively, internationally, to find these terrorists much more challenging.\u201d<\/span>

<\/span>It is hard to believe anything Mr. Brennan says. Last year, he bluntly denied that the C.I.A. had illegally hacked into the computers of Senate staff members conducting an investigation into the agency\u2019s detention and torture programs when, in fact, it did. In 2011, when he was President Obama\u2019s top counterterrorism adviser, he claimed that American drone strikes had not killed any civilians, despite clear evidence that they had. And his boss, James Clapper Jr., the director of national intelligence, has admitted lying to the Senate on the N.S.A.\u2019s bulk collection of data. Even putting this lack of credibility aside, it\u2019s not clear what extra powers Mr. Brennan is seeking.<\/span>

<\/span>\u2026\u2026\u2026<\/span>
In truth, intelligence authorities are still able to do most of what they did before \u2014 only now with a little more oversight by the courts and the public. There is no dispute that they and law enforcement agencies should have the necessary powers to detect and stop attacks before they happen. But that does not mean unquestioning acceptance of ineffective and very likely unconstitutional tactics that reduce civil liberties without making the public safer.<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

That was a major<\/b> case of whup ass that was unloaded on the leaders of the US state security apparatus.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Seeing as how the Times is the very much the voice of the conventional wisdom, so when they have excoriated intelligence officials’ opportunistic statements following the Paris attacks, it implies that there has been a shift in customary thinking: It\u2019s a wretched yet predictable ritual after each new terrorist attack: Certain politicians and government officials …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1002,1051,1102,1003],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-182211","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-good-writing","category-hypocrisy","category-intelligence","category-philosophy"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/182211"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=182211"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/182211\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=182211"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=182211"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=182211"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}