{"id":182256,"date":"2015-11-06T21:57:00","date_gmt":"2015-11-07T02:57:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/2015\/11\/06\/thats-gonna-leave-a-mark-2\/"},"modified":"2015-11-06T21:57:00","modified_gmt":"2015-11-07T02:57:00","slug":"thats-gonna-leave-a-mark-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/2015\/11\/06\/thats-gonna-leave-a-mark-2\/","title":{"rendered":"That&#8217;s Gonna Leave a Mark"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The Sith lord of academic journal publishing is Elsevier.<\/p>\n<p>They charge thousands of dollars a year for subscriptions, jacked their prices in a way that makes Martin Shkreli salivate, and they have threated lawsuits to keep researchers from publishing their own research.<\/p>\n<p>They are widely loathed in their field, and now <a href=\"https:\/\/www.techdirt.com\/articles\/20151103\/15475732708\/not-just-academics-fed-up-with-elsevier-entire-editorial-staff-resigns-en-masse-to-start-open-access-journal.shtml\">the entire staff of one of their journals has resigned to start up and independent open access journal<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><span style=\"color: blue;\">It&#8217;s really somewhat astounding just how absolutely <i>hated<\/i> journal  publishing giant Elsevier has become in certain academic circles. The  company seems to have perfected its role of being about as evil as  possible in trying to lock up knowledge and making it expensive and  difficult to access. A few years ago, we noted that a bunch of academics  were banding together to <a href=\"https:\/\/www.techdirt.com\/articles\/20120130\/13030217589\/will-academics-boycott-elsevier-be-tipping-point-open-access-another-embarrassing-flop.shtml\">boycott<\/a> journals published by the company, as more and more people were looking at <i>open access<\/i>  journals, allowing them to more freely share their research, rather  than locking it up. Elsevier&#8217;s response has been to basically <i>crack down<\/i> on efforts to share knowledge. The company has been known to <a href=\"https:\/\/www.techdirt.com\/articles\/20140319\/11185526626\/elsevier-still-charging-open-access-copies-two-years-after-it-was-told-problem.shtml\">charge for open access<\/a> research &#8212; sometimes even buying up journals and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.techdirt.com\/articles\/20150307\/17154930246\/elsevier-appears-to-be-slurping-up-open-access-research-charging-people-to-access-it.shtml\">ignoring<\/a> the open licenses on the works. The company has also been demanding professors <a href=\"https:\/\/www.techdirt.com\/articles\/20131206\/11175425487\/elsevier-continues-its-efforts-to-stifle-academic-research-to-pump-up-its-own-profits.shtml\">takedown<\/a> copies of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.techdirt.com\/articles\/20131218\/00393725601\/elsevier-ramps-up-its-war-access-to-knowledge.shtml\">their own research<\/a>.  Because how dare anyone actually benefit from knowledge without paying  Elsevier its toll. And that&#8217;s not even mentioning Elsevier&#8217;s history of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.techdirt.com\/articles\/20090503\/1255574725.shtml\">publishing fake journals<\/a> as a way to help giant pharmaceutical companies <a href=\"https:\/\/www.techdirt.com\/articles\/20090810\/1820235831.shtml\">pretend<\/a> their treatments were effective. <\/span><br \/><span style=\"color: blue;\"><br \/><\/span><span style=\"color: blue;\">Basically on the list of companies which really are pushing to get themselves declared &#8220;evil,&#8221; Elsevier has a prime spot. <\/span><br \/><span style=\"color: blue;\"><br \/><\/span><span style=\"color: blue;\">And now even its employees are revolting. The editorial staff of an Elsevier journal <a href=\"https:\/\/www.insidehighered.com\/news\/2015\/11\/02\/editors-and-editorial-board-quit-top-linguistics-journal-protest-subscription-fees\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">have all resigned to go start an open access journal<\/a> instead: <\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote><p><span style=\"color: blue;\">All six editors and all 31 editorial board members of Lingua, one of the  top journals in linguistics, last week resigned to protest Elsevier&#8217;s  policies on pricing and its refusal to convert the journal to an  open-access publication that would be free online. As soon as January,  when the departing editors&#8217; noncompete contracts expire, they plan to  start a new open-access journal to be called Glossa. <\/span><br \/><span style=\"color: blue;\"><br \/><\/span><span style=\"color: blue;\">The editors and editorial board members quit, they say, after telling  Elsevier of the frustrations of libraries reporting that they could not  afford to subscribe to the journal and in some cases couldn&#8217;t even  figure out what it would cost to subscribe. Prices quoted on the  Elsevier website suggest that an academic library in the United States  with a total student and faculty full-time equivalent number of around  10,000 would pay $2,211 for shared online access, and $1,966 for a print  copy.<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><span style=\"color: blue;\">One of the editors who quit notes that he&#8217;d &#8220;be better off going to flip  burgers&#8221; in the time he spent working for the journal, rather than  accepting the tiny amount Elsevier pays him.<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Note that the authors of these papers are not paid to publish.<\/p>\n<p>In fact, in a number of cases, they <b>pay<\/b> to offset the cost of publishing. <\/p>\n<p>And Elsevier is determined to suck the marrow out of learning, and dance on its bones.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Sith lord of academic journal publishing is Elsevier. They charge thousands of dollars a year for subscriptions, jacked their prices in a way that makes Martin Shkreli salivate, and they have threated lawsuits to keep researchers from publishing their own research. They are widely loathed in their field, and now the entire staff of &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1005,970,969,1109],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-182256","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-business","category-corruption","category-evil","category-ip"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/182256"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=182256"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/182256\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=182256"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=182256"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=182256"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}