{"id":182703,"date":"2015-06-26T20:27:00","date_gmt":"2015-06-27T01:27:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/2015\/06\/26\/clarence-thomas-is-a-miserable-excuse-for-a-human-being\/"},"modified":"2015-06-26T20:27:00","modified_gmt":"2015-06-27T01:27:00","slug":"clarence-thomas-is-a-miserable-excuse-for-a-human-being","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/2015\/06\/26\/clarence-thomas-is-a-miserable-excuse-for-a-human-being\/","title":{"rendered":"Clarence Thomas Is a Miserable Excuse for a Human Being"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>First, in <i>Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. The Inclusive Communities Project<\/i>, he <a href=\"http:\/\/www.salon.com\/2015\/06\/25\/clarence_thomas_the_nba_proves_racial_imbalance_can_be_good_for_black_people\/\">suggested that racist impact of government policy might be a good thing, because \u2026\u2026\u2026 the NBA<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><span style=\"color: blue;\">In a less headline grabbing decision today, the Supreme Court ruled that those affected by discriminatory housing decisions can sue even if they can\u2019t prove the discrimination was intentional.<\/span><br \/><span style=\"color: blue;\"><br \/><\/span><span style=\"color: blue;\">Civil rights groups were handed an unexpected victory when in a 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court endorsed the consideration of disparate impact to establish racial discrimination in housing cases under the 1968 Fair Housing Act.<\/span><br \/><span style=\"color: blue;\"><br \/><\/span><span style=\"color: blue;\">The otherwise pro-business Justice Kennedy wrote the majority opinion but one of the other noteworthy opinions came from conservative Justice Thomas\u2019 dissent, in which he wrote, \u201cthe fact that a practice has a disparate impact is not conclusive evidence that a practice is discriminatory.\u201d<\/span><br \/><span style=\"color: blue;\"><br \/><\/span><span style=\"color: blue;\">A well enough point, but it was the example he used to illustrate this point that proved most curious.<\/span><br \/><span style=\"color: blue;\"><br \/><\/span><span style=\"color: blue;\">\u201cOver 70 percent of National Basketball Association (NBA) players have been black,\u201d Thomas pointed out, arguing that \u201cracial imbalances do not always disfavor minorities.\u201d<\/span><br \/><span style=\"color: blue;\"><br \/><\/span><span style=\"color: blue;\">\u201cIf, for instance, white basketball players cannot bring disparate-impact suits\u2014 then we as a Court have constructed a scheme that parcels out legal privileges to individuals on the basis of skin color,\u201d he continued.<\/span><br \/><span style=\"color: blue;\"><br \/><\/span><span style=\"color: blue;\">Thomas went on to cite examples of minorities who \u201chave owned or directed more than half of whole industries in particular nations\u201d including  \u201cJews in Poland\u201d and \u201cthe Chinese in Malaysia\u201d to argue that not all disproportional representation is bad.<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Seriously?<\/p>\n<p>Bigotry is OK because of the percentage of blacks in the NBA? Or the because of the relative prosperity of the Chinese in Malaysia?<sup>*<\/sup><\/p>\n<p>And then, in his dissent in <i>Obergefell v. Hodges<\/i>, the gay marriage case, he <a href=\"http:\/\/www.rawstory.com\/2015\/06\/clarence-thomas-holds-some-pretty-horrifying-views-on-human-dignity\/\">suggests that slavery did not cause any loss of dignity in its subjects<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><span style=\"color: blue;\">Clarence Thomas slammed the majority that ruled in favor of marriage equality, saying the five U.S. Supreme Court justices had engaged in misguided efforts to advance dignity for same-sex couples.<\/span><br \/><span style=\"color: blue;\"><br \/><\/span><span style=\"color: blue;\">Thomas \u2013 who wrote his own opinion, along with the court\u2019s three other dissenters \u2013 argued that the Constitution contained no \u201cdignity\u201d clause.<\/span><br \/><span style=\"color: blue;\"><br \/><\/span><span style=\"color: blue;\">\u2026\u2026\u2026<\/span><br \/><span style=\"color: blue;\"><br \/><\/span><span style=\"color: blue;\">\u201cSlaves did not lose their dignity (any more than they lost their humanity) because the government allowed them to be enslaved,\u201d Thomas said. \u201cThose held in internment camps did not lose their dignity because the government confined them. And those denied governmental benefits certainly do not lose their dignity because the government denies them those benefits. The government cannot bestow dignity, and it cannot take it away.\u201d<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>This is pure crap, and I say it as someone who is required to thank God on a yearly basis because of, &#8220;What he did for me when I went forth from Egypt,&#8221; on Passover.<\/p>\n<p>Not only is this a failure as a human being, it is a miserable failure as a legal dissent.<\/p>\n<p>Yale Law School needs to apologize to the nation. <\/p>\n<p><sup>*<\/sup><span style=\"font-size: xx-small;\">Which was largely a result of the British Empire using ethnically divisive policies in order to maintain control.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>First, in Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. The Inclusive Communities Project, he suggested that racist impact of government policy might be a good thing, because \u2026\u2026\u2026 the NBA: In a less headline grabbing decision today, the Supreme Court ruled that those affected by discriminatory housing decisions can sue even if they can\u2019t &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[971,969,972,1030,982,979],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-182703","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-civil-rights","category-evil","category-justice","category-lgbtq","category-stupid","category-wanker"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/182703"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=182703"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/182703\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=182703"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=182703"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=182703"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}