{"id":182847,"date":"2015-05-24T20:39:00","date_gmt":"2015-05-25T01:39:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/2015\/05\/24\/and-yes-the-ttip-in-all-its-bee-killing-glory-sucks-too\/"},"modified":"2015-05-24T20:39:00","modified_gmt":"2015-05-25T01:39:00","slug":"and-yes-the-ttip-in-all-its-bee-killing-glory-sucks-too","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/2015\/05\/24\/and-yes-the-ttip-in-all-its-bee-killing-glory-sucks-too\/","title":{"rendered":"And Yes, the TTIP, in All Its Bee Killing Glory, Sucks Too"},"content":{"rendered":"

The US, acting on behalf of Monsanto and its ilk, pressured the EU into revoking its common sense pesticide regulations using the TTIP to coerce regulatory forbearance<\/a>:<\/p>\n

EU moves to regulate hormone-damaging chemicals linked to cancer and male infertility<\/a> were shelved following pressure from US trade officials over the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership<\/a> (TTIP) free trade deal, newly released documents show. <\/p>\n

Draft EU criteria could have banned 31 pesticides<\/a> containing endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs). But these were dumped amid fears of a trade backlash stoked by an aggressive US lobby push, access to information documents obtained by Pesticides Action Network (PAN) Europe<\/a> show. <\/p>\n

On 26 June 2013, a high-level delegation from the American Chambers of Commerce (AmCham) visited EU trade officials to insist that the bloc drop its planned criteria for identifying EDCs in favour of a new impact study. <\/p>\n

Minutes of the meeting show commission officials pleading that \u201calthough they want the TTIP<\/a> to be successful, they would not like to be seen as lowering the EU standards\u201d. <\/p>\n

The TTIP is a trade deal being agreed by the EU and US to remove barriers to commerce and promote free trade.<\/p>\n

Responding to the EU officials, AmCham representatives \u201ccomplained about the uselessness of creating categories and thus, lists\u201d of prohibited substances, the minutes show. <\/p>\n

The US trade representatives insisted that a risk-based approach be taken to regulation, and \u201cemphasised the need for an impact assessment\u201d instead. <\/p>\n

On 2 July 2013, officials from the US Mission to Europe<\/a> visited the EU to reinforce the message. Later that day, the secretary-general of the commission, Catherine Day, sent a letter to the environment department\u2019s director Karl Falkenberg, telling him to stand down the draft criteria.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe suggest that as other DGs [directorate-generals] have done, you consider making a joint single impact assessment to cover all the proposals,\u201d Day wrote. \u201cWe do not think it is necessary to prepare a commission recommendation on the criteria to identify endocrine disrupting substances.\u201d<\/p>\n

The result was that legislation planned for 2014 was kicked back until at least 2016, despite estimated health costs of \u20ac150bn per year in Europe from endocrine-related illnesses such as IQ loss, obesity and cryptorchidism \u2013 a condition affecting the genitals of baby boys.<\/p>\n

A month before the meeting, AmCham had warned the EU of \u201cwide-reaching implications\u201d if the draft criteria were approved. The trade body wanted an EU impact study to set looser thresholds for acceptable exposure to endocrines, based on a substance\u2019s potency.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe are worried to see that this decision, which is the source of many scientific debates, might be taken on political grounds, without first assessing what its impacts will be on the European market,\u201d the chair of AmCham\u2019s environment committee wrote in a letter to the commission.<\/p>\n

These could be \u201cdramatic\u201d the letter said.<\/p>\n

In a high-level internal note sent to the health commissioner, Tonio Borg, shortly afterwards, his departmental director-general warned that the EU\u2019s endocrines policy \u201cwill have substantial impacts for the economy, agriculture and trade\u201d.<\/p>\n

The heavily redacted letter, sent a week before the EU\u2019s plans were scrapped continued: \u201cThe US, Canada, and Brazil [have] already voiced concerns on the criteria which might lead to important repercussions on trade.\u201d<\/p>\n

The series of events was described as \u201cincredible\u201d by the the Green MEP Bas Eickhout. \u201cThese documents offer convincing evidence that TTIP not only presents a danger for the future lowering of European standards, but that this is happening as we speak,\u201d he told the Guardian.<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Even without a signed deal, it appears that the two big “Free Trade” deals being negotiated have already<\/b> been used to subvert consumer and environmental safeguards.<\/p>\n

Of course, this is precisely<\/b> what Obama said wouldn’t<\/b> happen, but I guess that he’s looking forward, not back.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The US, acting on behalf of Monsanto and its ilk, pressured the EU into revoking its common sense pesticide regulations using the TTIP to coerce regulatory forbearance: EU moves to regulate hormone-damaging chemicals linked to cancer and male infertility were shelved following pressure from US trade officials over the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1079,964,1051,1016,1150],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-182847","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-environment","category-foreign-relations","category-hypocrisy","category-international-commerce","category-public-health"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/182847"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=182847"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/182847\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=182847"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=182847"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=182847"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}