{"id":182860,"date":"2015-05-19T22:19:00","date_gmt":"2015-05-20T03:19:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/2015\/05\/19\/this-is-a-good-rebuttal-of-obamas-pro-tpp-arguments\/"},"modified":"2015-05-19T22:19:00","modified_gmt":"2015-05-20T03:19:00","slug":"this-is-a-good-rebuttal-of-obamas-pro-tpp-arguments","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/2015\/05\/19\/this-is-a-good-rebuttal-of-obamas-pro-tpp-arguments\/","title":{"rendered":"This is a Good Rebuttal of Obama’s Pro TPP Arguments"},"content":{"rendered":"

Michael Wessel, who has been deeply involved with trade deals, and who has had access to the classified draft text of the TPP<\/abbr>, has basically called Barack Obama over his claims about the trade deal<\/a>:<\/p>\n

You need to tell me what\u2019s wrong with this trade agreement, not one that was passed 25 years ago,\u201d a frustrated President Barack Obama recently complained about criticisms of the Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP). He\u2019s right. The public criticisms of the TPP have been vague. That\u2019s by design\u2014anyone who has read the text of the agreement could be jailed for disclosing its contents. I\u2019ve actually read the TPP text provided to the government\u2019s own advisors, and I\u2019ve given the president an earful about how this trade deal will damage this nation. But I can\u2019t share my criticisms with you.<\/span>

<\/span>I can tell you that Elizabeth Warren is right about her criticism of the trade deal. We should be very concerned about what’s hidden in this trade deal\u2014and particularly how the Obama administration is keeping information secret even from those of us who are supposed to provide advice.<\/span>

<\/span>So-called \u201ccleared advisors\u201d like me are prohibited from sharing publicly the criticisms we\u2019ve lodged about specific proposals and approaches. The government has created a perfect Catch 22: The law prohibits us from talking about the specifics of what we\u2019ve seen, allowing the president to criticize us for not being specific. Instead of simply admitting that he disagrees with me\u2014and with many other cleared advisors\u2014about the merits of the TPP, the president instead pretends that our specific, pointed criticisms don\u2019t exist.<\/span>

<\/span>What I can tell you is that the administration is being unfair to those who are raising proper questions about the harms the TPP would do. To the administration, everyone who questions their approach is branded as a protectionist\u2014or worse\u2014dishonest. They broadly criticize organized labor, despite the fact that unions have been the primary force in America pushing for strong rules to promote opportunity and jobs. And they dismiss individuals like me who believe that, first and foremost, a trade agreement should promote the interests of domestic producers and their employees.<\/span>

<\/span>I\u2019ve been deeply involved in trade policy for almost four decades. For 21 years, I worked for former Democratic Leader Richard Gephardt and handled all trade policy issues including \u201cfast track,\u201d the North American Free Trade Agreement and the World Trade Organization\u2019s Uruguay Round, which is the largest trade agreement in history. I am also a consultant to various domestic producers and the United Steelworkers union, for whom I serve as a cleared advisor on two trade advisory committees. To top it off, I was a publicly acknowledged advisor to the Obama campaign in 2008.<\/span>

<\/span>\u2026\u2026\u2026<\/span>

<\/span>The text of the TPP, like all trade deals, is a closely guarded secret. That fact makes a genuine public debate impossible and should make robust debate behind closed doors all the more essential. But the ability of TPP critics like me to point out the deal\u2019s many failings is limited by the government\u2019s surprising and unprecedented refusal to make revisions to the language in the TPP fully available to cleared advisors<\/span><\/b>.<\/span>

<\/span>Bill Clinton didn\u2019t operate like this. During the debate on NAFTA, as a cleared advisor for the Democratic leadership, I had a copy of the entire text in a safe next to my desk and regularly was briefed on the specifics of the negotiations, including counterproposals made by Mexico and Canada. During the TPP negotiations, the United States Trade Representative (USTR) has never shared proposals being advanced by other TPP partners. Today\u2019s consultations are, in many ways, much more restrictive than those under past administrations.<\/span>

<\/span>\u2026\u2026\u2026<\/span>

<\/span>Only portions of the text have been provided, to be read under the watchful eye of a USTR official. Access, up until recently, was provided on secure web sites. But the government-run website does not contain the most-up-to-date information for cleared advisors. To get that information, we have to travel to certain government facilities and sign in to read the materials. Even then, the administration determines what we can and cannot review and, often, they provide carefully edited summaries rather than the actual underlying text, which is critical to really understanding the consequences of the agreement.<\/span>

<\/span>\u2026\u2026\u2026<\/span>

<\/span>In an effort to diminish criticism, USTR is now letting cleared advisors review summaries of what the negotiators have done. In response to a question about when the full updated text will be made available, we\u2019ve been told, \u201cWe are working on making them available as soon as possible.\u201d That\u2019s not the case overseas: Our trading partners have this text, but the government\u2019s own cleared advisors, serving on statutorily-created advisory committees, are kept in the dark.<\/span>

<\/span>\u2026\u2026\u2026<\/span>

<\/span>Senator Warren should be commended for her courage in standing up to the President, and Secretary Clinton for raising a note of caution, and I encourage all elected officials to raise these important questions. Working Americans can\u2019t afford more failed trade agreements and trade policies.<\/span>

<\/span>Congress should refuse to pass fast track trade negotiating authority until the partnership between the branches, and the trust of the American people is restored. That will require a lot of fence mending and disclosure of exactly what the TPP will do. That begins by sharing the final text of the TPP with those of us who won\u2019t simply rubber-stamp it.<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

(emphasis mine<\/i>)<\/p>\n

What might be useful here is an amendment to any fast track legislation that says that the full and final text of any agreement, along with all side agreements, must be made available to the public in full for some period of time (I would suggest 6 months, which is enough time for lawyers who make their money on gaming this sort of crap to develop loose lips) before it can be taken up by the Congress.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Michael Wessel, who has been deeply involved with trade deals, and who has had access to the classified draft text of the TPP, has basically called Barack Obama over his claims about the trade deal: You need to tell me what\u2019s wrong with this trade agreement, not one that was passed 25 years ago,\u201d a …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[998,964,1016,1020],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-182860","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-congress","category-foreign-relations","category-international-commerce","category-legislation"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/182860"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=182860"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/182860\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=182860"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=182860"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=182860"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}