{"id":183706,"date":"2012-12-12T23:50:00","date_gmt":"2012-12-13T04:50:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/2012\/12\/12\/the-doj-admits-that-the-banksters-are-too-big-to-prosecute\/"},"modified":"2012-12-12T23:50:00","modified_gmt":"2012-12-13T04:50:00","slug":"the-doj-admits-that-the-banksters-are-too-big-to-prosecute","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/2012\/12\/12\/the-doj-admits-that-the-banksters-are-too-big-to-prosecute\/","title":{"rendered":"The DoJ Admits that the Banksters are too Big to Prosecute"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/embed><\/object> We don’t need no water let the Motherf#$%er Burn Burn Motherf#$%er Burn<\/span><\/div>\n

Case in point, HSBC, which was literally<\/b> laundering drug cartel money.<\/p>\n

It will not be criminally prosecuted because it is too big to fail<\/a>: <\/p>\n

State and federal authorities decided against indicting HSBC in a money-laundering case over concerns that criminal charges could jeopardize one of the world’s largest banks and ultimately destabilize the global financial system.<\/span>

<\/span>Instead, HSBC announced on Tuesday that it had agreed to a record $1.92 billion settlement with authorities. The bank, which is based in Britain, faces accusations that it transferred billions of dollars for nations like Iran and enabled Mexican drug cartels to move money illegally through its American subsidiaries.<\/span>

<\/span>While the settlement with HSBC is a major victory for the government, the case raises questions about whether certain financial institutions, having grown so large and interconnected, are too big to indict. Four years after the failure of Lehman Brothers nearly toppled the financial system, regulators are still wary that a single institution could undermine the recovery of the industry and the economy.<\/span>

<\/span>But the threat of criminal prosecution acts as a powerful deterrent. If authorities signal such actions are remote for big banks, the threat could lose its sting.<\/span>

<\/span>Behind the scenes, authorities debated for months the advantages and perils of a criminal indictment against HSBC.<\/span>

<\/span>Some prosecutors at the Justice Department’s criminal division and the Manhattan district attorney’s office wanted the bank to plead guilty to violations of the federal Bank Secrecy Act, according to the officials with direct knowledge of the matter, who spoke on the condition of anonymity. The law requires financial institutions to report any cash transaction of $10,000 or more and to bring any dubious activity to the attention of regulators.<\/span>

<\/span>Given the extent of the evidence against HSBC, some prosecutors saw the charge as a healthy compromise between a settlement and a harsher money-laundering indictment. While the charge would most likely tarnish the bank’s reputation, some officials argued that it would not set off a series of devastating consequences.<\/span>

<\/span>A money-laundering indictment, or a guilty plea over such charges, would essentially be a death sentence for the bank. Such actions could cut off the bank from certain investors like pension funds and ultimately cost it its charter to operate in the United States, officials said.<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Seriously. Burn, motherf%$#er burn.<\/p>\n

If there is no rule of law, the banks don’t matter.<\/p>\n

H\/t Matt Stoller<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

We don’t need no water let the Motherf#$%er Burn Burn Motherf#$%er Burn Case in point, HSBC, which was literally laundering drug cartel money. It will not be criminally prosecuted because it is too big to fail: State and federal authorities decided against indicting HSBC in a money-laundering case over concerns that criminal charges could jeopardize …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[970,1004,1051,972,985],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-183706","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-corruption","category-finance","category-hypocrisy","category-justice","category-regulation"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/183706"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=183706"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/183706\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=183706"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=183706"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=183706"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}