{"id":185590,"date":"2014-10-05T19:44:00","date_gmt":"2014-10-06T00:44:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/2014\/10\/05\/canada-defers-f-35-decision\/"},"modified":"2014-10-05T19:44:00","modified_gmt":"2014-10-06T00:44:00","slug":"canada-defers-f-35-decision","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/2014\/10\/05\/canada-defers-f-35-decision\/","title":{"rendered":"Canada Defers F-35 Decision"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>They have decided to <a href=\"http:\/\/awin.aviationweek.com\/ArticlesStory.aspx?id=087bcf54-6d1e-4c27-ba21-83f182d59aa1\">rebuild and extend the life of their F-18 Hornets, and defer their decision on the F-35<\/a>: (<i>paid subscription required<\/i>)<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><span style=\"color: blue;\">Canada\u2019s conservative government, which has spent four years pushing for a noncompetitive purchase of the Lockheed Martin F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, announced at the end of September it would delay retirement of the Royal Canadian Air Force\u2019s Boeing CF-18A\/B Hornets for up to five years, until 2025. Canada will, however, continue to support JSF.<\/span><br \/><span style=\"color: blue;\"><br \/><\/span> <span style=\"color: blue;\">With an election due next year, Prime Minister Stephen Harper appears to have passed the Next-Generation Fighter Capability (NGFC) decision to the next administration, after reports in June that the announcement of a JSF buy was imminent. \u201cHarper was poised to pull the trigger,\u201d one industry source suggests, \u201cbut he backed away\u201d following negative public and media reaction. An F-35 buy could have been portrayed as an attempt to foreclose options before the election, and a decision to conduct a competition would be seen as a capitulation, the source suggests. The latest announcement indicates intent to maintain RCAF strength without rushing the NGFC choice.<\/span><br \/><span style=\"color: blue;\"><br \/><\/span> <span style=\"color: blue;\">The move is not a complete surprise. Lockheed Martin says it is \u201cnot news\u201d and that planned Canadian JSF deliveries extend through 2025. (The schedule spanned 2017-22, based on late-2011 plans.) However, there are no programs under contract that support Hornet operations beyond 2020: L-3\u2019s Military Aircraft Systems unit, which supports the Hornet airframe and systems for Canada, had no comment, and Canada\u2019s Department of National Defense (DND) also declined to respond.<\/span><br \/><span style=\"color: blue;\"><br \/><\/span> <span style=\"color: blue;\">The future of the NGFC depends on the pending election: A decisive Conservative win would favor the F-35, while opposition parties could move toward a competition or delay the entire program. A September report stating Canada had short-listed the F-35 and Super Hornet has been dismissed as inaccurate. \u201cIt will either be the F-35 or an open competition,\u201d says a source associated with a potential NGFC competitor.<\/span><br \/><span style=\"color: blue;\"><br \/><\/span> <span style=\"color: blue;\">The contentious next-gen fighter debate started when DND\u2014then led by Peter MacKay\u2014sought to bypass Canadian law that forbids sole-source procurements except under strictly defined circumstances. In 2008, the DND defined key NGFC requirements and concluded that two aircraft other than the JSF could meet them. But in 2010, to justify a sole-source JSF buy, DND issued a revised set of requirements that it claimed only JSF could meet.<\/span><br \/><span style=\"color: blue;\"><br \/><\/span> <span style=\"color: blue;\">After a scathing report in 2012 by the auditor-general, the government stripped the DND of authority over the next-gen fighter, shifting authority to the Public Works Department for the acquisition. In February, an independent review panel validated the air force\u2019s new process for evaluating four contenders: the F-35, the Boeing Super Hornet, the Dassault Rafale and the Eurofighter Typhoon.<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>I would argue that of those 4, the F-35 is the least well suited to their requirements, which is for domestic defense, operating at long ranges, over uninhibited land, where it was always better to lose <b>AN<\/b> engine than it is to lose <b>THE<\/b> engine.<\/p>\n<p>The F-35 will cost more to purchase, and more to operate, than any other of the alternatives.<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s low observability characteristics have no advantage in the interceptor role.<\/p>\n<p>It is a closed system which makes it effectively impossible for Canada&#8217;s domestic defense establishment from qualifying new weapons on it.<\/p>\n<p>The only advantage is that it generates &#8220;Poodle Points&#8221; with the US.<\/p>\n<p>Poodle points can, of course, be cashed in for \u2026\u2026\u2026 Nothing at all.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>They have decided to rebuild and extend the life of their F-18 Hornets, and defer their decision on the F-35: (paid subscription required) Canada\u2019s conservative government, which has spent four years pushing for a noncompetitive purchase of the Lockheed Martin F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, announced at the end of September it would delay retirement of &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1007,1113,1008,1000,1006,978],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-185590","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-aviation","category-canada","category-defense-procurement","category-elections","category-military","category-politics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/185590"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=185590"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/185590\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=185590"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=185590"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=185590"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}