{"id":185939,"date":"2014-07-09T21:17:00","date_gmt":"2014-07-10T02:17:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/2014\/07\/09\/well-played\/"},"modified":"2014-07-09T21:17:00","modified_gmt":"2014-07-10T02:17:00","slug":"well-played","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/2014\/07\/09\/well-played\/","title":{"rendered":"Well Played"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Have you heard the feud in the Senate between Senators Begich (D-AK) and McKiskill (D-MO)?<\/p>\n<p>The language has <a href=\"http:\/\/talkingpointsmemo.com\/dc\/mccaskill-begich-ancs-letter\">gotten quite heated<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><span style=\"color: blue;\">Sen. Mark Begich (D-AK), one of the more vulnerable Democrats in this fall&#8217;s midterm elections, was unusually harsh last week when he criticized his fellow Democrat, Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-MO), for scrutinizing the federal contracts of Alaska Native Corporations despite his &#8220;repeated attempts to reason with her.&#8221;<\/span><br \/><span style=\"color: blue;\"><br \/><\/span><span style=\"color: blue;\">It was an uncharacteristically abrasive tone for Begich to strike with another Democrat. But in the context of his re-election race, it makes more sense. His campaign&#8217;s message has focused on Alaskan issues &#8212; like energy and fishing policy &#8212; and battling another Democrat is never a bad look for a Democrat in a otherwise red state.<\/span><br \/><span style=\"color: blue;\"><br \/><\/span><span style=\"color: blue;\">Now a follow-up letter sent by Begich on Tuesday and the accompanying statement from McCaskill suggests that McCaskill, while legitimately pursuing an issue that she&#8217;s studied for six years, is also content to let Begich score a few political points at home.<\/span><br \/><span style=\"color: blue;\"><br \/><\/span><span style=\"color: blue;\">Both sides win: McCaskill assumes the oversight role that the former state auditor relishes, and Begich gets to publicly fight on behalf of a popular program back home.<\/span><br \/><span style=\"color: blue;\"><br \/><\/span><span style=\"color: blue;\">\u2026\u2026\u2026<\/span><br \/><span style=\"color: blue;\"><br \/><\/span><span style=\"color: blue;\">McCaskill&#8217;s office had previously declined to respond to Begich&#8217;s public rebuke. But asked by TPM about the letter, McCaskill called her colleague a &#8220;problem&#8221; in a prepared statement. Though, to Alaska&#8217;s voters, he might not sound like much of a problem at all.<\/span><br \/><span style=\"color: blue;\"><br \/><\/span><span style=\"color: blue;\">\u201cI\u2019ve fought for six years to change the law in regard to Alaska Native Corporations,&#8221; she said in the statement. &#8220;There has consistently been one problem\u2014Mark Begich. He single-handedly protects Alaska and the ANCs.\u201d<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>McKaskill and Begich both win.<\/p>\n<p>Begich gets points at home for fighting his own party for a program that benefits Alaskans, and McKaskill gets to present a facade of fiscal probity.<\/p>\n<p>I believe that this called &#8220;Political Kabuki&#8221;.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Have you heard the feud in the Senate between Senators Begich (D-AK) and McKiskill (D-MO)? The language has gotten quite heated: Sen. Mark Begich (D-AK), one of the more vulnerable Democrats in this fall&#8217;s midterm elections, was unusually harsh last week when he criticized his fellow Democrat, Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-MO), for scrutinizing the federal &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1038,998,1000,978,1085],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-185939","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-budget","category-congress","category-elections","category-politics","category-win"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/185939"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=185939"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/185939\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=185939"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=185939"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=185939"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}