{"id":186144,"date":"2014-04-25T19:40:00","date_gmt":"2014-04-26T00:40:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/2014\/04\/25\/the-rich-are-not-the-best-of-us-they-are-the-worst-of-us\/"},"modified":"2014-04-25T19:40:00","modified_gmt":"2014-04-26T00:40:00","slug":"the-rich-are-not-the-best-of-us-they-are-the-worst-of-us","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/2014\/04\/25\/the-rich-are-not-the-best-of-us-they-are-the-worst-of-us\/","title":{"rendered":"The Rich are not the Best of Us, they are the Worst of Us"},"content":{"rendered":"

An interesting study finds that the more money you have, the more likely you are to ignore rules and endanger others<\/a>:<\/p>\n

What defines low socioeconomic status? Objectively, it means fewer economic resources and educational opportunities, less access to elite schools and clubs, more subordinate positions in the workplace, and increased levels of stress. For the upper-class, it\u2019s just the inverse: more resources, more leisure, less stress.<\/span>

<\/span>From the realities facing each group, you might assume that members of the lower-class would be more focused on meeting their own survival needs and, thereby, prioritize their needs over those of others. As a result, you might also expect them to be less trustworthy as compared to members of the upper-class who, given their greater resources, have the luxury to trust. But if you do, you\u2019re missing a central point about how trust really works. Trust isn\u2019t a luxury. It\u2019s a tool we need to get by when we can\u2019t make it on our own; it\u2019s a means of survival for those who must depend on others. Viewed this way, predictions about trust and class get turned on their heads.<\/span>

<\/span>\u2026\u2026\u2026<\/span>

<\/span>To relate that to social class, consider this experiment. You\u2019re standing on a corner in downtown San Francisco. It\u2019s a four-way stop, meaning cars are supposed to pause before entering the intersection. As you\u2019re sipping your latte, you look to your left before stepping off the curb. The car approaching is a shiny BMW. Do you cross? How about if it\u2019s a Ford Fusion? The model of trust I\u2019ve been describing suggests you might want to pause if it\u2019s the BMW. There\u2019s really only one way to tell, though. You\u2019ve got to put yourself out there. And that\u2019s just what Paul Piff and colleagues from the University of California at Berkeley did.<\/span>

<\/span>As cars approached this busy intersection in San Francisco, a researcher would enter the crosswalk. Unbeknownst to drivers, he also noted the make of their car and their perceived age and gender. The main datum for each car was whether the driver paused to let the researcher cross at the stop sign (as is required by the California Vehicle Code) or sped up to cut him off and thereby proceed more quickly toward the driver\u2019s goals. Paul and colleagues divided drivers into five SES categories based on their cars\u2014think Hyundais on one end and Ferraris on the other. The results were quite remarkable.<\/span>

<\/span>At the lowest end of the class gradient, every single driver stopped to let the pedestrian entering the crosswalk continue on his way. Midway up the class ladder, about 30 percent of drivers broke the law and cut off the pedestrian so that they could keep going. At the upper end of SES, almost 50 percent of drivers broke the law to put their own needs first. At the most basic level, these findings offer a provocative warning. When you\u2019re vulnerable, upper-class individuals are more likely to disregard the trust you place in them if doing so furthers their own ends.<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

This is the first of a number of tests executed by Professor Piff did.<\/p>\n

The better off someone was, the more likely to act in a completely self-absorbed and untrustworthy manner.<\/p>\n

It applied to cars, lying to a potential job applicant about a job, or cheating at a gambling game.<\/p>\n

It is precisely the opposite of the Calvanist ethos that grips the right wing.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

An interesting study finds that the more money you have, the more likely you are to ignore rules and endanger others: What defines low socioeconomic status? Objectively, it means fewer economic resources and educational opportunities, less access to elite schools and clubs, more subordinate positions in the workplace, and increased levels of stress. For the …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[973,1003,1058],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-186144","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-economy","category-philosophy","category-sociology"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/186144"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=186144"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/186144\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=186144"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=186144"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=186144"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}