{"id":186186,"date":"2014-04-11T21:44:00","date_gmt":"2014-04-12T02:44:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/2014\/04\/11\/barack-obama-is-not-a-member-of-the-the-reality-based-community\/"},"modified":"2014-04-11T21:44:00","modified_gmt":"2014-04-12T02:44:00","slug":"barack-obama-is-not-a-member-of-the-the-reality-based-community","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/2014\/04\/11\/barack-obama-is-not-a-member-of-the-the-reality-based-community\/","title":{"rendered":"Barack Obama is Not a Member of the the Reality-Based Community"},"content":{"rendered":"

The “reality-based” bon mot is, of course from Run Suskind’s description of the hubris and delusions of the Bush administration<\/a>:<\/p>\n

In the summer of 2002, after I had written an article in Esquire that the White House didn’t like about Bush’s former communications director, Karen Hughes, I had a meeting with a senior adviser to Bush. He expressed the White House’s displeasure, and then he told me something that at the time I didn’t fully comprehend — but which I now believe gets to the very heart of the Bush presidency.<\/span>

<\/span>The aide said that guys like me were “in what we call the reality-based community,” which he defined as people who “believe that solutions emerge from your judicious study of discernible reality.” I nodded and murmured something about enlightenment principles and empiricism. He cut me off. “That’s not the way the world really works anymore,” he continued. “We’re an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you’re studying that reality — judiciously, as you will — we’ll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that’s how things will sort out. We’re history’s actors . . . and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do.” <\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Well, it increasingly appears that Barack Obama comes from a very similar place<\/a>:<\/p>\n

Am I misjudging our time, or have we entered some accelerated cycle of American subversions, and then another cycle of coverups and disinformation that do not quite come off? In less than a year, the Obama administration has mounted four covert coup operations, all variants of the classic Cold War model, all costly of human life, all assuring us the contempt and animosity of many people for years to come.<\/span>

<\/span>In chronological order:<\/span>

<\/span>* The American-authorized coup in Egypt last July. In the disinformation universe, Washington watched at a distance. Since the coup, dead silence in the face of a blood bath, except for Secretary of State Kerry\u2019s applause for the Egyptian army\u2019s \u201crestoration of democracy.\u201d<\/span>

<\/span>\u2022 In the war to depose Syria\u2019s Bashar al-Assad, the linchpin event is the chemical-weapons attack last Aug. 21. We are invited \u2014 required, actually \u2014 to believe Assad allowed U.N. inspectors in to determine responsibility for previous gas attacks and then launched another attack near Damascus while the inspectors were settled in their hotel rooms.<\/span>

<\/span>* The role of the U.S. and its European allies in financing, fomenting and steering the direction of the Ukraine coup requires little discussion at this point. Rather bizarrely in the face of all we have on record, the Obama people continue to insist Ukraine is nothing more than a case of Russian overreach. As order unravels in the eastern sections of the country, it is important to bear in mind the chronology of events \u2014 and from the beginning, not somewhere in the middle.<\/span>

<\/span>* In Venezuela, the foreign minister recently read aloud portions of intercepted cable traffic documenting American subterfuge. No, no, no: Nicol\u00e1s Maduro, successor to the late Hugo Ch\u00e1vez, is just as paranoid as his mentor, and both were merely trying to distract Venezuelans from their economic problems. (Vigilance is always essential when Washington and the hacks marshal the \u201cdistraction\u201d thesis.)<\/span>

<\/span>Cuba could go on this list, given news of Washington\u2019s operation of a social-media network on Cuban soil via the customary collection of front companies, except that intruding covertly in Cuba is so routine as to be (appallingly) unremarkable.<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

And Seymour Hersh is all over how Barack Obama attempted to lie us into a Libya-type war<\/a>:<\/p>\n

In 2011 Barack Obama led an allied military intervention in Libya without consulting the US Congress. Last August, after the sarin attack on the Damascus suburb of Ghouta, he was ready to launch an allied air strike, this time to punish the Syrian government for allegedly crossing the \u2018red line\u2019 he had set in 2012 on the use of chemical weapons. Then with less than two days to go before the planned strike, he announced that he would seek congressional approval for the intervention. The strike was postponed as Congress prepared for hearings, and subsequently cancelled when Obama accepted Assad\u2019s offer to relinquish his chemical arsenal in a deal brokered by Russia. Why did Obama delay and then relent on Syria when he was not shy about rushing into Libya? The answer lies in a clash between those in the administration who were committed to enforcing the red line, and military leaders who thought that going to war was both unjustified and potentially disastrous.<\/span>

<\/span>Obama\u2019s change of mind had its origins at Porton Down, the defence laboratory in Wiltshire. British intelligence had obtained a sample of the sarin used in the 21 August attack and analysis demonstrated that the gas used didn\u2019t match the batches known to exist in the Syrian army\u2019s chemical weapons arsenal. The message that the case against Syria wouldn\u2019t hold up was quickly relayed to the US joint chiefs of staff. The British report heightened doubts inside the Pentagon; the joint chiefs were already preparing to warn Obama that his plans for a far-reaching bomb and missile attack on Syria\u2019s infrastructure could lead to a wider war in the Middle East. As a consequence the American officers delivered a last-minute caution to the president, which, in their view, eventually led to his cancelling the attack.<\/span>

<\/span>For months there had been acute concern among senior military leaders and the intelligence community about the role in the war of Syria\u2019s neighbours, especially Turkey. Prime Minister Recep Erdo\u011fan was known to be supporting the al-Nusra Front, a jihadist faction among the rebel opposition, as well as other Islamist rebel groups. \u2018We knew there were some in the Turkish government,\u2019 a former senior US intelligence official, who has access to current intelligence, told me, \u2018who believed they could get Assad\u2019s nuts in a vice by dabbling with a sarin attack inside Syria \u2013 and forcing Obama to make good on his red line threat.\u2019<\/span>

<\/span>\u2026\u2026\u2026<\/span>

<\/span>A series of chemical weapon attacks in March and April 2013 was investigated over the next few months by a special UN mission to Syria. A person with close knowledge of the UN\u2019s activity in Syria told me that there was evidence linking the Syrian opposition to the first gas attack, on 19 March in Khan Al-Assal, a village near Aleppo. In its final report in December, the mission said that at least 19 civilians and one Syrian soldier were among the fatalities, along with scores of injured. It had no mandate to assign responsibility for the attack, but the person with knowledge of the UN\u2019s activities said: \u2018Investigators interviewed the people who were there, including the doctors who treated the victims. It was clear that the rebels used the gas. It did not come out in public because no one wanted to know.\u2019<\/span>

<\/span>In the months before the attacks began, a former senior Defense Department official told me, the DIA was circulating a daily classified report known as SYRUP on all intelligence related to the Syrian conflict, including material on chemical weapons. But in the spring, distribution of the part of the report concerning chemical weapons was severely curtailed on the orders of Denis McDonough, the White House chief of staff. \u2018Something was in there that triggered a shit fit by McDonough,\u2019 the former Defense Department official said. \u2018One day it was a huge deal, and then, after the March and April sarin attacks\u2019 \u2013 he snapped his fingers \u2013 \u2018it\u2019s no longer there.\u2019 The decision to restrict distribution was made as the joint chiefs ordered intensive contingency planning for a possible ground invasion of Syria whose primary objective would be the elimination of chemical weapons.<\/span>

<\/span>\u2026\u2026\u2026<\/span>

<\/span>In the aftermath of the 21 August attack Obama ordered the Pentagon to draw up targets for bombing. Early in the process, the former intelligence official said, \u2018the White House rejected 35 target sets provided by the joint chiefs of staff as being insufficiently \u201cpainful\u201d to the Assad regime.\u2019 The original targets included only military sites and nothing by way of civilian infrastructure. Under White House pressure, the US attack plan evolved into \u2018a monster strike\u2019: two wings of B-52 bombers were shifted to airbases close to Syria, and navy submarines and ships equipped with Tomahawk missiles were deployed<\/b>. \u2018Every day the target list was getting longer,\u2019 the former intelligence official told me. \u2018The Pentagon planners said we can\u2019t use only Tomahawks to strike at Syria\u2019s missile sites because their warheads are buried too far below ground, so the two B-52 air wings with two-thousand pound bombs were assigned to the mission<\/b>. Then we\u2019ll need standby search-and-rescue teams to recover downed pilots and drones for target selection. It became huge<\/b>.\u2019 The new target list was meant to \u2018completely eradicate any military capabilities Assad had\u2019, the former intelligence official said. The core targets included electric power grids, oil and gas depots, all known logistic and weapons depots, all known command and control facilities, and all known military and intelligence buildings.<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

(emphasis mine<\/i>)<\/p>\n

Once again, what was sold as a strike for a specific purpose is actually being run as a flat out attempt at regime change.<\/p>\n

I am not arguing that Barack Obama is simply George W. Bush with a prettier (and smarter) wife. (At least not today)<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Rather, I am suggesting that, notwithstanding protestations of “Hope” and “Change”, Barack Obama is a creature of the political and bureaucratic institutions in Washington, and he lacks the inclination, and perhaps the power to challenge them.<\/p>\n

This is far more worrying, because it means that it is not the elected officials, who periodically must submit themselves to the will of the voters, but rather the internal bureaucracies of our foreign policy\/war making apparatus who are approaching our interests from a viewpoint detached from reality.<\/p>\n

This makes our foreign policy missteps over the past decade or so an artifact of an ineluctably dysfunctional culture.<\/p>\n

When one looks at history, this is a place occupied by empires just before their death throes.<\/p>\n

This will not be pretty.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The “reality-based” bon mot is, of course from Run Suskind’s description of the hubris and delusions of the Bush administration: In the summer of 2002, after I had written an article in Esquire that the White House didn’t like about Bush’s former communications director, Karen Hughes, I had a meeting with a senior adviser to …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1142,964,1002,1011,1051,1173],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-186186","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-barack-obama","category-foreign-relations","category-good-writing","category-history","category-hypocrisy","category-white-house"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/186186"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=186186"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/186186\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=186186"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=186186"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=186186"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}