{"id":186560,"date":"2013-12-20T19:30:00","date_gmt":"2013-12-21T00:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/2013\/12\/20\/well-duh-6\/"},"modified":"2013-12-20T19:30:00","modified_gmt":"2013-12-21T00:30:00","slug":"well-duh-6","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/2013\/12\/20\/well-duh-6\/","title":{"rendered":"Well, Duh"},"content":{"rendered":"

Eric Stern, a staffer for Brian Schweitzer, demonstrates how the NRA systematically ignores its alleged values to endorse Republicans<\/a>:<\/p>\n

\u2026\u2026\u2026But when the NRA voter guide was published, Schweitzer received an F. He called the NRA to demand an explanation. They claimed they never received his questionnaire. It must have gotten lost in the mail, they told him. Schweitzer faxed them a copy, but they said it was too late.<\/span>

<\/span>\u2026\u2026\u2026<\/span>

<\/span>Once again he mailed in his NRA survey, confident of an A (I believe that at the time, an A-plus rating was only achievable by answering \u201cYes\u201d to the question, \u201cDo you support the right to possess guns in all places, including schools?\u201d).<\/span>

<\/span>For insurance, he met with NRA staff in Washington. They assured him that he was likely to receive the endorsement. But then the voter guide arrived, and the NRA had endorsed his opponent.<\/span>

<\/span>Again he demanded an explanation. The NRA said they\u2019d decided that Schweitzer\u2019s opponent \u201cshould get the benefit of the doubt\u201d because he was an incumbent, whereas Schweitzer had never held office.<\/span>

<\/span>\u2026\u2026\u2026<\/span>

<\/span>Schweitzer won that race narrowly, but rose to become a powerful political force in Montana, upending the old order, turning much of the state from red to blue, and pulling in many other democrats on his substantial coattails. He also revealed a distinctive quality: he sought revenge against anyone that crossed him, often without regard to the the political cost of doing so. So he naturally couldn\u2019t resist bad-mouthing the NRA on the Bill Maher show one evening in 2007 when the subject of gun politics was raised, accusing the group of being \u201ca fully owned division of the Republican Party\u2026the National Republican Agency.\u201d<\/span>

<\/span>This created an enjoyable situation when, in 2008, running for reelection as a virtually unbeatable incumbent, he notified the NRA that he not only expected an endorsement this time around, but that he wanted Wayne La Pierre, the NRA president, to come do it personally.<\/span>

<\/span>The NRA did everything they could to come up with an excuse to not grant the request, but ultimately they blinked. La Pierre, perhaps wary of Schweitzer\u2019s penchant of creating a commotion if slighted, came to Billings in the summer of 2008 for a press conference at which he grudgingly told the TV cameras that Montana gun owners and hunters that should vote for Schweitzer. (Schweitzer\u2019s challenger was already projected to lose by about 30 points, but for good measure Schweitzer rented a giant billboard right across the street from the guy\u2019s campaign headquarters, with an ad boasting of the NRA\u2019s endorsement.)<\/span>

<\/span>When the NRA voting guide arrived that fall, there were Montana candidates endorsed for Senate, Congress, Attorney General\u2026.but no Governor. Schweitzer called once again for an explanation. They told him that they had no idea how this had happened. The printer must have screwed up. It was a regrettable mix up, and they would try to correct it immediately.<\/span>

<\/span>But of course, they didn\u2019t.<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Brian Schweitzer is seriously considering a Presidential run in 2016<\/a>, and the fact that he might have a Lyndon Baines Johnson level of vindictiveness makes me look upon her more favorable.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Eric Stern, a staffer for Brian Schweitzer, demonstrates how the NRA systematically ignores its alleged values to endorse Republicans: \u2026\u2026\u2026But when the NRA voter guide was published, Schweitzer received an F. He called the NRA to demand an explanation. They claimed they never received his questionnaire. It must have gotten lost in the mail, they …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1000,1055,978],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-186560","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-elections","category-gun-laws","category-politics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/186560"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=186560"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/186560\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=186560"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=186560"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=186560"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}