{"id":186692,"date":"2013-11-14T22:13:00","date_gmt":"2013-11-15T03:13:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/2013\/11\/14\/thank-you-julian-assange\/"},"modified":"2013-11-14T22:13:00","modified_gmt":"2013-11-15T03:13:00","slug":"thank-you-julian-assange","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/2013\/11\/14\/thank-you-julian-assange\/","title":{"rendered":"Thank You, Julian Assange"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Wikileaks has released a draft of IP provisions of the super-secret draft of the Trans Pacific partnership, and rather unsurprisingly, it <a href=\"http:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/commentisfree\/2013\/nov\/13\/trans-pacific-paternership-intellectual-property\">sucks wet farts from dead pigeons<\/a>: (See also NC&#8217;s analysis <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nakedcapitalism.com\/2013\/11\/house-pushing-back-on-trade-deal-more-detail-on-how-secretive-arbitration-panels-undermine-laws-and-regulations.html\">here<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nakedcapitalism.com\/2013\/11\/wikileaks-disclosure-of-intellectual-property-chapter-of-trade-deal-shows-it-will-kill-people-and-internet-house-opposition-is-widespread.html\">here<\/a>)<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><span style=\"color: blue;\">The more you know about the odious Trans-Pacific Partnership, the less you&#8217;ll like it. It&#8217;s made for corporate intellectual property and profits<\/span><br \/><span style=\"color: blue;\"><br \/><\/span> <span style=\"color: blue;\">Among the many betrayals of the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/world\/obama-administration\" title=\"More from the Guardian on Obama administration\">Obama administration<\/a> is its overall treatment of what many people refer to as &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/law\/intellectual-property\" title=\"More from the Guardian on Intellectual property\">intellectual property<\/a>&#8221;  \u2013 the idea that ideas themselves and digital goods and services are  exactly like physical property, and that therefore the law should treat  them the same way. This corporatist stance defies both reality and the  American Constitution, which expressly called for creators to have  rights for limited periods, the goal of which was to promote inventive  progress and the arts.<\/span><br \/><span style=\"color: blue;\"><br \/><\/span> <span style=\"color: blue;\">In the years 2007 and 2008, candidate Obama  indicated that he&#8217;d take a more nuanced view than the absolutist one  from Hollywood and other interests that work relentlessly for total  control over this increasingly vital part of our economy and lives. But  no clearer demonstration of the real White House view is offered than a  just-leaked draft of an international treaty that would, as many had  feared, create draconian new rights for corporate &#8220;owners&#8221; and mean  vastly fewer rights for the rest of us.<\/span><br \/><span style=\"color: blue;\"><br \/><\/span> <span style=\"color: blue;\">I&#8217;m talking about the appalling Trans-Pacific Partnership agreement, a <a href=\"https:\/\/wikileaks.org\/tpp\/pressrelease.html\">partial draft<\/a> of which <a href=\"http:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/media\/wikileaks\" title=\"More from the Guardian on WikiLeaks\">WikiLeaks<\/a>  has just released. This treaty has been negotiated in secret meetings  dominated by governments and corporations. You and I have been  systematically excluded, and once you <a href=\"http:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/media\/2013\/nov\/13\/wikileaks-trans-pacific-partnership-chapter-secret\">learn what they&#8217;re doing<\/a>, you can see why.<\/span><br \/><span style=\"color: blue;\">The  outsiders who understand TPP best aren&#8217;t surprised. That is, the draft  &#8220;confirms fears that the negotiating parties are prepared to expand the  reach of intellectual property rights, and shrink consumer rights and  safeguards,&#8221; <a href=\"http:\/\/www.keionline.org\/node\/1825\">writes James Love<\/a> a longtime watcher of this process.<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p><span style=\"color: blue;\">The Obama administration is rushing to reach a new deal intended to lower barriers to trade with a dozen Pacific Rim nations, including Japan and Canada, before the end of the year.<\/span><br \/><span style=\"color: blue;\"><br \/><\/span> <span style=\"color: blue;\">But the White House is now facing new hurdles closer to home, with nearly half of the members of the House signing letters or otherwise signaling their opposition to granting so-called fast-track authority that would make any agreement immune to a Senate filibuster and not subject to amendment. No major trade pact has been approved by Congress in recent decades without such authority.<\/span><br \/><span style=\"color: blue;\"><br \/><\/span> <span style=\"color: blue;\">Two new House letters with about 170 signatories in total \u2014 the latest and strongest iteration of long-simmering opposition to fast-track authority and to the trade deal more broadly \u2014 have been disclosed just a week before international negotiators are to meet in Salt Lake City for another round of talks.<\/span><br \/><span style=\"color: blue;\"><br \/><\/span> <span style=\"color: blue;\">\u201cSome of us have opposed past trade deals and some have supported them, but when it comes to fast track, members of Congress from across the political spectrum are united,\u201d said Representative Walter B. Jones Jr. of North Carolina, who circulated the Republican letter.<\/span><br \/><span style=\"color: blue;\"><br \/><\/span> <span style=\"color: blue;\">Without fast-track authority, however, the other countries in the negotiations might balk at American requests since they wouldn\u2019t be sure the final deal would remain unchanged. And getting both houses of Congress to agree to the final deal might be close to impossible without the fast-track authority, which the Obama administration has requested and which is being pursued in the Senate by Max Baucus, Democrat of Montana and the chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, along with the top Republican on the committee, Orrin G. Hatch of Utah. <\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>It&#8217;s not just liberal papers like the <i>Guardian<\/i> that are finding the draft extreme, so is <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/blogs\/the-switch\/wp\/2013\/11\/13\/leaked-treaty-is-a-hollywood-wish-list-could-it-derail-obamas-trade-agenda\/\"><i>The Washington Post<\/i><\/a>, aka the former Kaplan Test Prep Company.<\/p>\n<p>It should be noted that while the administration is sharing progress with a number of industries, they are treating sharing progress with the Congress like the NSA spying program, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2013\/11\/13\/business\/international\/house-stalls-trade-pact-momentum.html\">which has resulted in some pushback<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><span style=\"color: blue;\">The Obama administration is rushing to reach a new deal intended to lower barriers to trade with a dozen Pacific Rim nations, including Japan and Canada, before the end of the year.<\/span><br \/><span style=\"color: blue;\"><br \/><\/span><span style=\"color: blue;\">But the White House is now facing new hurdles closer to home, with nearly half of the members of the House signing letters or otherwise signaling their opposition to granting so-called fast-track authority that would make any agreement immune to a Senate filibuster and not subject to amendment. No major trade pact has been approved by Congress in recent decades without such authority.<\/span><br \/><span style=\"color: blue;\"><br \/><\/span><span style=\"color: blue;\">Two new House letters with about 170 signatories in total \u2014 the latest and strongest iteration of long-simmering opposition to fast-track authority and to the trade deal more broadly \u2014 have been disclosed just a week before international negotiators are to meet in Salt Lake City for another round of talks.<\/span><br \/><span style=\"color: blue;\"><br \/><\/span><span style=\"color: blue;\">\u201cSome of us have opposed past trade deals and some have supported them, but when it comes to fast track, members of Congress from across the political spectrum are united,\u201d said Representative Walter B. Jones Jr. of North Carolina, who circulated the Republican letter.<\/span><br \/><span style=\"color: blue;\"><br \/><\/span><span style=\"color: blue;\">Without fast-track authority, however, the other countries in the negotiations might balk at American requests since they wouldn\u2019t be sure the final deal would remain unchanged. And getting both houses of Congress to agree to the final deal might be close to impossible without the fast-track authority, which the Obama administration has requested and which is being pursued in the Senate by Max Baucus, Democrat of Montana and the chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, along with the top Republican on the committee, Orrin G. Hatch of Utah. <\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>The TPP has been kept tightly secret because they know that the reality will create immediate and widespread opposition that will make the SOPA affair look like a tea party.<\/p>\n<p>If it passes, it will be put over the top by Republican votes, which must boil the Tea Party&#8217;s ass.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Wikileaks has released a draft of IP provisions of the super-secret draft of the Trans Pacific partnership, and rather unsurprisingly, it sucks wet farts from dead pigeons: (See also NC&#8217;s analysis here and here) The more you know about the odious Trans-Pacific Partnership, the less you&#8217;ll like it. It&#8217;s made for corporate intellectual property and &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1134,969,964,1109,1191],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-186692","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-copyright","category-evil","category-foreign-relations","category-ip","category-patent"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/186692"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=186692"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/186692\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=186692"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=186692"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=186692"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}