{"id":188312,"date":"2010-10-22T12:19:00","date_gmt":"2010-10-22T17:19:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/2010\/10\/22\/why-the-aqua-buddha-works\/"},"modified":"2010-10-22T12:19:00","modified_gmt":"2010-10-22T17:19:00","slug":"why-the-aqua-buddha-works","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/2010\/10\/22\/why-the-aqua-buddha-works\/","title":{"rendered":"Why the Aqua Buddha Works"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I suggested that Rand Paul <a href=\"http:\/\/40yrs.blogspot.com\/2010\/10\/wasp.html\">might be pushed into doing something stupid<\/a>, but I missed an obvious point, one that <a href=\"http:\/\/www.talkingpointsmemo.com\/archives\/2010\/10\/the_full_aqua.php\"><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Talking Points Memo<\/span>&#8216;s Josh Marshall got<\/a>, which was that by making the attack, and by Paul responding with indignation, &#8220;How dare you,&#8221; rather than a strong denial and push-back, &#8220;My opponent is a liar,&#8221; he has shown himself to be weak, and the voters <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">hate<\/span> weakness.<\/p>\n<p>He calls it the, &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/talkingpointsmemo.com\/archives\/148765.php\">Bitch slap theory of electoral politics<\/a>&#8220;:<\/p>\n<blockquote style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 153);\"><p>Let&#8217;s call it the Republicans&#8217; Bitch-Slap theory of electoral politics.<\/p>\n<p>It goes something like this.<\/p>\n<p>On one level, of course, the aim behind these attacks is to cast suspicion upon Kerry&#8217;s military service record and label him a liar. But that&#8217;s only part of what&#8217;s going on.<\/p>\n<p>Consider for a moment what the big game is here. This is a battle between two candidates to demonstrate toughness on national security. Toughness is a unitary quality, really &#8212; a personal, characterological quality rather than one rooted in policy or divisible in any real way. So both sides are trying to prove to undecided voters either that they&#8217;re tougher than the other guy or at least tough enough for the job.<\/p>\n<p>In a post-9\/11 environment, obviously, this question of strength, toughness or resolve is particularly salient. That, of course, is why so much of this debate is about war and military service in the first place.<\/p>\n<p>One way &#8212; perhaps the best way &#8212; to demonstrate someone&#8217;s lack of toughness or strength is to attack them and show they are either unwilling or unable to defend themselves &#8212; thus the rough slang I used above. And that I think is a big part of what is happening here. Someone who can&#8217;t or won&#8217;t defend themselves certainly isn&#8217;t someone you can depend upon to defend you.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Rand Paul was bitch slapped by Jack Conway, and now he&#8217;s acting like a bitch, not shaking hands and implying that he will skip the last debate.<\/p>\n<p>Josh Green at <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">The Atlantic<\/span> notes, &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.theatlantic.com\/politics\/archive\/10\/10\/will-rand-paul-man-up\/64988\/\">The issue isn&#8217;t Paul&#8217;s Christianity, but his manhood<\/a>,&#8221; and that his talk about skipping the final debate is all anyone is talking about.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I suggested that Rand Paul might be pushed into doing something stupid, but I missed an obvious point, one that Talking Points Memo&#8216;s Josh Marshall got, which was that by making the attack, and by Paul responding with indignation, &#8220;How dare you,&#8221; rather than a strong denial and push-back, &#8220;My opponent is a liar,&#8221; he &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[998,1000,1064,1003],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-188312","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-congress","category-elections","category-media","category-philosophy"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/188312"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=188312"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/188312\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=188312"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=188312"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=188312"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}