{"id":188463,"date":"2010-09-21T19:53:00","date_gmt":"2010-09-22T00:53:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/2010\/09\/21\/more-federal-reserve-kremlinology\/"},"modified":"2010-09-21T19:53:00","modified_gmt":"2010-09-22T00:53:00","slug":"more-federal-reserve-kremlinology","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/2010\/09\/21\/more-federal-reserve-kremlinology\/","title":{"rendered":"More Federal Reserve Kremlinology"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The FOMC met and issued its report, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cnbc.com\/\/id\/39290620\">and their policy remained unchanged<\/a>, though they did say that they might engage in more quantitative easing (printing money) because they believe that the economy may be trending down.<\/p>\n<p>Basically, they won&#8217;t do anything this time around, but they <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">might<\/span> later, even though, &#8220;Measures of underlying inflation are currently at levels somewhat below those the Committee judges most consistent, over the longer run, with its mandate to promote maximum employment and price stability.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>So, unemployment is higher than their mandate allows, and inflation is lower than their mandate allows, and so they will do \u2026\u2026\u2026 nothing at all for now.<\/p>\n<p>As <a href=\"http:\/\/www.eschatonblog.com\/2010\/09\/everthings-terrible-its-all-our-fault.html\">Atrios so aptly noted<\/a>, &#8220;The <span style=\"font-variant: small-caps; font-weight: bold;\">sociopaths<\/span> at the Fed have spoken.&#8221; (<span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Emphasis mine<\/span>)<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s the only way you can describe their behavior:  They are essentially saying that we are in, or entering, a recessionary spiral, but doing their job is hard.<\/p>\n<p>That being said, the <a href=\"http:\/\/online.wsj.com\/article\/SB10001424052748704129204575505341209923002.html\">US dollar weakened following the fed statement<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>The full Fed statement is after the break:<br \/><a name='more'><\/a><\/p>\n<blockquote><p><span style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 153);\">Press Release<\/span><br \/><span style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 153);\">Federal Reserve Press Release<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 153);\">Release Date: September 21, 2010<\/span><br \/><span style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 153);\">For immediate release<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 153);\">Information received since the Federal Open Market Committee met in August indicates that the pace of recovery in output and employment has slowed in recent months. Household spending is increasing gradually, but remains constrained by high unemployment, modest income growth, lower housing wealth, and tight credit. Business spending on equipment and software is rising, though less rapidly than earlier in the year, while investment in nonresidential structures continues to be weak. Employers remain reluctant to add to payrolls. Housing starts are at a depressed level. Bank lending has continued to contract, but at a reduced rate in recent months. The Committee anticipates a gradual return to higher levels of resource utilization in a context of price stability, although the pace of economic recovery is likely to be modest in the near term.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 153);\">Measures of underlying inflation are currently at levels somewhat below those the Committee judges most consistent, over the longer run, with its mandate to promote maximum employment and price stability. With substantial resource slack continuing to restrain cost pressures and longer-term inflation expectations stable, inflation is likely to remain subdued for some time before rising to levels the Committee considers consistent with its mandate.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 153);\">The Committee will maintain the target range for the federal funds rate at 0 to 1\/4 percent and continues to anticipate that economic conditions, including low rates of resource utilization, subdued inflation trends, and stable inflation expectations, are likely to warrant exceptionally low levels for the federal funds rate for an extended period. The Committee also will maintain its existing policy of reinvesting principal payments from its securities holdings.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 153);\">The Committee will continue to monitor the economic outlook and financial developments and is prepared to provide additional accommodation if needed to support the economic recovery and to return inflation, over time, to levels consistent with its mandate.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 153);\">Voting for the FOMC monetary policy action were: Ben S. Bernanke, Chairman; William C. Dudley, Vice Chairman; James Bullard; Elizabeth A. Duke; Sandra Pianalto; Eric S. Rosengren; Daniel K. Tarullo; and Kevin M. Warsh.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 153);\">Voting against the policy was Thomas M. Hoenig, who judged that the economy continues to recover at a moderate pace. Accordingly, he believed that continuing to express the expectation of exceptionally low levels of the federal funds rate for an extended period was no longer warranted and will lead to future imbalances that undermine stable long-run growth. In addition, given economic and financial conditions, Mr. Hoenig did not believe that continuing to reinvest principal payments from its securities holdings was required to support the Committee\u2019s policy objectives.<\/span> <\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The FOMC met and issued its report, and their policy remained unchanged, though they did say that they might engage in more quantitative easing (printing money) because they believe that the economy may be trending down. Basically, they won&#8217;t do anything this time around, but they might later, even though, &#8220;Measures of underlying inflation are &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[973,1004,985],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-188463","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-economy","category-finance","category-regulation"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/188463"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=188463"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/188463\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=188463"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=188463"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=188463"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}