{"id":189545,"date":"2010-03-13T20:14:00","date_gmt":"2010-03-14T01:14:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/2010\/03\/13\/so-now-open-source-is-piracy\/"},"modified":"2010-03-13T20:14:00","modified_gmt":"2010-03-14T01:14:00","slug":"so-now-open-source-is-piracy","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/2010\/03\/13\/so-now-open-source-is-piracy\/","title":{"rendered":"So Now, Open Source is Piracy"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"border: 1px solid black; margin: 0px 10px; padding: 5px; width: 250px; float: right; text-align: center;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/img690.imageshack.us\/img690\/173\/288pxopensourcesvg84854.png\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/img690.imageshack.us\/img690\/173\/288pxopensourcesvg84854.png\" bordercolor=\"white\" border=\"0\" width=\"240\" \/><\/a><span style=\"font-style: italic;\"><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/img683.imageshack.us\/img683\/5246\/535pxheckertgnuwhitesvg.png\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/img683.imageshack.us\/img683\/5246\/535pxheckertgnuwhitesvg.png\" bordercolor=\"white\" border=\"0\" width=\"240\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/img687.imageshack.us\/img687\/4792\/303pxcclogosvg8736557.png\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/img687.imageshack.us\/img687\/4792\/303pxcclogosvg8736557.png\" bordercolor=\"white\" border=\"0\" width=\"240\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>These are your friends<br \/><\/span><\/div>\n<p>The International Intellectual Property Alliance (<span>IIPA<\/span>), a private group which is the demon spawn of the <span>RIAA<\/span>, the <span>MPAA<\/span>, and other evil organizations referred to by their acronyms, has submitted recommendations to the State Department for countries to be placed on a watch list for ineffective protection of <span>IP<\/span>, a so called &#8220;Special 301&#8221; list, and one of their criteria is now <a href=\"http:\/\/www.technollama.co.uk\/encouraging-open-source-could-land-you-in-trouble\">encouraging the use of open source software<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><span style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 153);\">I am neither surprised nor upset by the addition of <a href=\"http:\/\/www.iipa.com\/rbc\/2010\/2010SPEC301COSTARICA.pdf\">Costa Rica<\/a> to the list, to be fair our enforcement  is atrocious. Similarly, I am not surprised by most of the other  recommendations, which seems like a rehash of past offenders. What I  found rather surprising is that the <span>IIPA<\/span> seems to be using their Special  301 submission to attack open source software. According to <a href=\"http:\/\/www.digital-copyright.ca\/node\/5115\">Digital Copyright Canada<\/a>, several countries are  being included in the Special 301 <span>watchlist<\/span> because they have open  source-friendly policies, or in their words, the <span>IIPA<\/span> would rather  people \u201cpirate\u201d than switch to legal competitors.<\/p>\n<p>This is quite a claim, so I have been going through the reports to  verify it myself. The country reports for <a href=\"http:\/\/www.iipa.com\/rbc\/2010\/2010SPEC301BRAZIL.pdf\">Brazil<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.iipa.com\/rbc\/2010\/2010SPEC301INDIA.pdf\">India<\/a>,  <a href=\"http:\/\/www.iipa.com\/rbc\/2010\/2010SPEC301PHILIPPINES.pdf\">Philippines<\/a>,  <a href=\"http:\/\/www.iipa.com\/rbc\/2010\/2010SPEC301VIETNAM.pdf\">Vietnam<\/a>  and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.iipa.com\/rbc\/2010\/2010SPEC301THAILAND.pdf\">Thailand<\/a>  certainly contain some comments about open source software.  Particularly, the <span>IIPA<\/span> seems to be concerned that these countries have  enacted or are in the process of enacting legislation that will make it  obligatory for public entities to choose open source software over its  proprietary counterparts. I have to admit that I somewhat share the  <span>IIPA<\/span>\u2019s concerns in this regard. I have never believed in open source  procurement legislation, I think that forcing institutions to use a  specific technical solution is wrong. Open source is an organic,  bottom-up movement, and making it state policy seems not only  counter-productive, but contrary to the very same principles of  openness. Open source should not be imposed, it should win on its own  merits.<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Here is what the <span>IIPA<\/span> says:<\/p>\n<blockquote style=\"color: rgb(102, 0, 0);\"><p>\u201cWhile <span>IIPA<\/span> has no issue with one of the stated goals of the circular, namely, \u201creducing software copyright violation,\u201d the Indonesian government\u2019s policy as indicated in the circular letter instead simply weakens the software industry and undermines its long-term competitiveness by creating an artificial preference for companies offering open source software and related services, even as it denies many legitimate companies access to the government market. Rather than fostering a system that will allow users to benefit from the best solution available in the market, irrespective of the development model, it encourages a mindset that does not give due consideration to the value to intellectual creations. As such, it fails to build respect for intellectual property rights and also limits the ability of government or public-sector customers (e.g., State-owned enterprise) to choose the best solutions to meet the needs of their organizations and the Indonesian people. It also amounts to a significant market access barrier for the software industry.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Let&#8217;s see, the countries are saying that <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">as a matter of policy<\/span>, free and open is cheaper, and reduces the risks of violation of <span>IP<\/span> rules, which could result in US sanctions, so as a matter of policy, wherever possible, go with software that carries a &#8220;public license.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>According to the <span>IIPA<\/span>, that&#8217;s the same as piracy.<\/p>\n<p>There is no right for private firms to demand that anyone buy their products, particularly not sovereign governments.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>These are your friends The International Intellectual Property Alliance (IIPA), a private group which is the demon spawn of the RIAA, the MPAA, and other evil organizations referred to by their acronyms, has submitted recommendations to the State Department for countries to be placed on a watch list for ineffective protection of IP, a so &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1134,964,1016,1109,989],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-189545","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-copyright","category-foreign-relations","category-international-commerce","category-ip","category-software"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/189545"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=189545"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/189545\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=189545"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=189545"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=189545"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}