{"id":189548,"date":"2010-03-13T06:43:00","date_gmt":"2010-03-13T11:43:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/2010\/03\/13\/death-spiral-jsf-edition-chapter-3-of-many\/"},"modified":"2010-03-13T06:43:00","modified_gmt":"2010-03-13T11:43:00","slug":"death-spiral-jsf-edition-chapter-3-of-many","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/2010\/03\/13\/death-spiral-jsf-edition-chapter-3-of-many\/","title":{"rendered":"Death Spiral, JSF Edition, Chapter 3 of Many"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A while ago, I wrote about the <a href=\"http:\/\/40yrs.blogspot.com\/2010\/02\/death-spiral-jsf-edition-chapter-2-of.html\">F-35&#8217;s exhaust being so hot that it required modifications to carrier and LPD decks<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Well, as Ron Popeil says, &#8220;but wait, there&#8217;s more\/&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>It is now likely that the exhaust will be hot enough so that <a href=\"http:\/\/www.aviationweek.com\/aw\/blogs\/defense\/index.jsp?plckController=Blog&amp;plckScript=blogScript&amp;plckElementId=blogDest&amp;plckBlogPage=BlogViewPost&amp;plckPostId=Blog%3A27ec4a53-dcc8-42d0-bd3a-01329aef79a7Post%3A27103ee8-d867-4e32-a619-92297fa29cf3\">the aircraft will be unable to operate from austere fields in STOVL mode<\/a>, and by, &#8220;Austere,&#8221; we mean, &#8220;just about any non-military airfield in the world,&#8221; as well as a lot of the military ones:<\/p>\n<blockquote style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 153);\"><p>But  a Navy report issued in January says that the F-35B, in fact, won&#8217;t be  able to use such forward bases. Indeed, unless it ditches its short  take-off, vertical landing capability and touches down like a  conventional fighter, it won&#8217;t be able to use land bases at all without  some major construction efforts.<\/p>\n<p>The <a href=\"http:\/\/www.wbdg.org\/ccb\/NAVFAC\/INTCRIT\/fy10_01.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" title=\"F-35B\/C Infrastructure\" rel=\"noopener\">newly released document<\/a>, hosted on a  government building-design resource site, outlines what  base-construction engineers need to do to ensure that the F-35B&#8217;s  exhaust does not turn the surface it lands on into an area-denial  weapon. And it&#8217;s not trivial. Vertical-landing &#8220;pads will be exposed to  1700 deg. F and high velocity (Mach 1) exhaust,&#8221; the report says. The  exhaust will melt asphalt and &#8220;is likely to spall the surface of  standard airfield concrete pavements on the first VL.&#8221; (The report  leaves to the imagination what jagged chunks of spalled concrete will do  in a supersonic blast field.)<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>What&#8217;s more, if you make an appropriate landing area, it has to be in one slab, without joints, because there are current <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">no existing sealers<\/span> that can take the heat, and if the aircraft is waiting for clearance with its APU (the Integrated  Power Pack or IPP) running, <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">that<\/span> can burn holes in the runway too.<\/p>\n<p>Bill Sweetman is correct when he notes, &#8220;Worst case or not, there is a very big difference between a solid slab of high-grade concrete and the kind of surface you are apt to find anywhere ending in -stan.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>And then there is cost, where the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dodbuzz.com\/2010\/03\/11\/jsf-costs-rocket-50-percent\/\">JSF unit cost is up 50% from its 2002 number<\/a>, shattering the Nunn-McCurdy barrier, and that is <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">assuming<\/span> that the purchase numbers remain the same, something is about as likely as Obama pursuing war crimes prosecutions against Dick Cheney.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A while ago, I wrote about the F-35&#8217;s exhaust being so hot that it required modifications to carrier and LPD decks. Well, as Ron Popeil says, &#8220;but wait, there&#8217;s more\/&#8221; It is now likely that the exhaust will be hot enough so that the aircraft will be unable to operate from austere fields in STOVL &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1007,1038,1008,1025],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-189548","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-aviation","category-budget","category-defense-procurement","category-technology"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/189548"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=189548"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/189548\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=189548"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=189548"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=189548"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}