{"id":189755,"date":"2010-02-16T23:52:00","date_gmt":"2010-02-17T04:52:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/2010\/02\/16\/big-surprise\/"},"modified":"2010-02-16T23:52:00","modified_gmt":"2010-02-17T04:52:00","slug":"big-surprise","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/2010\/02\/16\/big-surprise\/","title":{"rendered":"Big Surprise"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"border: 1px solid black; margin: 0px 10px; width: 260px; float: right; text-align: center;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/img718.imageshack.us\/img718\/8417\/quadns3985557.gif\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/img718.imageshack.us\/img718\/8417\/quadns3985557.gif\" bordercolor=\"white\" border=\"0\" width=\"250\" \/><\/a><br \/>What causes this?<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/img163.imageshack.us\/img163\/1892\/churchlady1452885.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/img163.imageshack.us\/img163\/1892\/churchlady1452885.jpg\" bordercolor=\"white\" border=\"0\" \/><\/a> <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Could it be \u2026\u2026\u2026\u2026 <span style=\"font-variant: small-caps; font-weight: bold; color: rgb(255, 0, 0);\">Satan?<\/span><\/span><\/div>\n<p>Barry Ritholtz finds a rather delicious piece of information showing that fraud in earnings statements is rather widespread, to be fair, it originally came from the <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Wall Street Journal<\/span>, but since that&#8217;s behind a pay wall, and Ritholtz summarizes nicely, he gets the link.<\/p>\n<p>You see, when you look at companies reporting earnings per share, the general number is rounded to the whole cent, but when you delve deeper into the numbers you get fractions of a cent per share, and lo and behold, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ritholtz.com\/blog\/2010\/02\/proof-companies-manage-earnings\/\">a fraction of 0.4\u00a2 a share is conspicuously absent from these numbers<\/a>?<\/p>\n<p>Why would this be?<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s not the work of Satan, but the work of accountants.<\/p>\n<p>Basically, if your earnings are 13.4\u00a2 a share, you announce earnings of 13\u00a2 a share, but if they are 13.5\u00a2 a share, you announce earnings of 14\u00a2 a share.<\/p>\n<p>This number is statistically significant.<\/p>\n<p>If you saw this in a poll you would immediately conclude that someone was <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">just making sh%$ up<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p>Quoting Ritholtz, quoting the <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Journal<\/span>:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>    <span style=\"color: rgb(102, 0, 0);\">The study, which examined nearly half a million earnings reports over a 27-year period, reached its conclusion by going beyond the standard per-share earnings results that are reported in pennies and analyzing the numbers down to the 10th of a cent.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: rgb(102, 0, 0);\">    That deeper look showed that companies tend to nudge their earnings numbers up by a 10th of a cent or two. That lets them round results up to the highest cent. Investors often snap up shares of companies that beat earnings expectations, even by a cent, and, likewise, sell off shares of companies that don\u2019t make their numbers.\u201d<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><span style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 153);\">I love the euphemism \u201cmeet investor expectations\u201d as opposed to the more colloquial \u201c<span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">lie cheat and steal.<\/span>\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 153);\">It also points out the <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">need for the SEC to develop a Department of Quantitative Analysis filled with math geeks and computers, doing nothing but sifting through data looking for investor fraud<\/span>. I\u2019d bet they would get more convictions than the rest of the SEC combined. (If someone in the SEC would call me, I\u2019ll help you set it up).<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>(<span style=\"font-style: italic;\">emphasis mine<\/span>)<\/p>\n<p>This is the sort of application of &#8220;quants&#8221; in finance that I could wholeheartedly get behind.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>What causes this? Could it be \u2026\u2026\u2026\u2026 Satan? Barry Ritholtz finds a rather delicious piece of information showing that fraud in earnings statements is rather widespread, to be fair, it originally came from the Wall Street Journal, but since that&#8217;s behind a pay wall, and Ritholtz summarizes nicely, he gets the link. You see, when &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1005,970,1004,992],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-189755","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-business","category-corruption","category-finance","category-statistics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/189755"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=189755"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/189755\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=189755"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=189755"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=189755"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}