{"id":189869,"date":"2010-02-05T12:54:00","date_gmt":"2010-02-05T17:54:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/2010\/02\/05\/the-employment-numbers\/"},"modified":"2010-02-05T12:54:00","modified_gmt":"2010-02-05T17:54:00","slug":"the-employment-numbers","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/2010\/02\/05\/the-employment-numbers\/","title":{"rendered":"The Employment Numbers"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"border: 1px solid black; margin: 0px 10px; width: 375px; float: right; text-align: center;\">Click for full size<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/img697.imageshack.us\/img697\/7430\/unemployedover26weeksja.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/img697.imageshack.us\/img697\/7430\/unemployedover26weeksja.jpg\" bordercolor=\"white\" border=\"0\" width=\"375\" \/><\/a> <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">H\/t <a href=\"http:\/\/www.calculatedriskblog.com\/2010\/02\/unemployed-over-26-weeks-and-seasonal.html\">Calculated Risk<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/img688.imageshack.us\/img688\/2714\/employpopjan20105229992.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/img688.imageshack.us\/img688\/2714\/employpopjan20105229992.jpg\" bordercolor=\"white\" border=\"0\" width=\"375\" \/><\/a><br \/>Employment Population Ration, h\/t <a href=\"http:\/\/www.calculatedriskblog.com\/2010\/02\/employment-population-ratio-part-time.html\">Calculated Risk<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/img688.imageshack.us\/img688\/3639\/parttimejan5373349.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/img688.imageshack.us\/img688\/3639\/parttimejan5373349.jpg\" bordercolor=\"white\" border=\"0\" width=\"375\" \/><\/a><br \/>Part time involuntarily, h\/t <a href=\"http:\/\/www.calculatedriskblog.com\/2010\/02\/employment-population-ratio-part-time.html\">Calculated Risk<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/img192.imageshack.us\/img192\/9726\/percentjoblossesjan2010.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/img192.imageshack.us\/img192\/9726\/percentjoblossesjan2010.jpg\" bordercolor=\"white\" border=\"0\" width=\"375\" \/><\/a><br \/>Worst recession since WWII, h\/t <a href=\"http:\/\/www.calculatedriskblog.com\/2010\/02\/employment-report-20k-jobs-lost-97.html\">Calculated Risk<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/img163.imageshack.us\/img163\/6342\/temporaryhelpjan2010559.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/img163.imageshack.us\/img163\/6342\/temporaryhelpjan2010559.jpg\" bordercolor=\"white\" border=\"0\" width=\"375\" \/><\/a><br \/>Temp hiring, which is a leading indicator, is improving, h\/t <a href=\"http:\/\/www.calculatedriskblog.com\/2010\/02\/employment-population-ratio-part-time.html\">Calculated Risk<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/img713.imageshack.us\/img713\/4769\/deathofbirthdeath627414a.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/img713.imageshack.us\/img713\/4769\/deathofbirthdeath627414a.jpg\" bordercolor=\"white\" border=\"0\" width=\"375\" \/><\/a><br \/>Birth\/death model, h\/t <a href=\"http:\/\/dailyreckoning.com\/interactive-what-should-be-the-death-of-the-birthdeath-model\/\">Daily Reckoning<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n<p>Well, the good news is that the unemployment rate fell to 9.7%.  The bad news is that <a href=\"http:\/\/www.reuters.com\/article\/idUSN1416882220100205?\">non farm payroll fell by 20,000<\/a>, while analysts had forecast an <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">increase<\/span> of 5,000.<\/p>\n<p>Unemployment falling is therefore entirely the result of people, most notably white women, <a href=\"http:\/\/washingtonindependent.com\/75857\/white-women-push-jobless-rate-down-to-9-7-percent\">having stopped looking for work<\/a>, so I would not call it a good thing.<\/p>\n<p>The fact is that long term unemployment, people who have been unemployed for more than 26 weeks,<sup>*<\/sup> has <a href=\"http:\/\/www.calculatedriskblog.com\/2010\/02\/unemployed-over-26-weeks-and-seasonal.html?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+CalculatedRisk+%28Calculated+Risk%29\">hit 4.1% of the civilian workforce<\/a>, an all time record.<\/p>\n<p>Barry Ritholtz <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ritholtz.com\/blog\/2010\/02\/dissecting-the-nonfarm-payroll-data\/\">digs a bit deeper<\/a>, and finds positive data points:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>The household survey shows an increase, and the household survey covers small business missed by the business survey.<\/li>\n<li>Temp employment increased, and temp hiring leads full time hiring, assuming that companies don&#8217;t go &#8220;permatemp&#8221;.\n<ul>\n<li>I would note that I have anecdotally observed this when I call &#8220;job shops&#8221; about contract work.  Things to seem to be picking up, hence 2 interviews (1 in person and 1 phone) in the past 2 weeks, as versus 1 (phone) interview in the prior 6 months.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li>Part-time for economic reasons (underemployed) fell sharply (3<sup>rd<\/sup> graph from top)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>As I <a href=\"http:\/\/40yrs.blogspot.com\/2010\/02\/big-change-in-birthdeath-adjustment.html\">noted yesterday<\/a>, there was a big change in the &#8220;birth\/death&#8221; adjustment, (bottom graph) and the adjustment appears to me to be more of an exercise in political number manipulation than a reasonably applied statistical technique.<\/p>\n<p>In any case, if you scroll down on the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.bls.gov\/news.release\/empsit.nr0.htm\">full BLS report<\/a>, they talk about the adjustment:<\/p>\n<blockquote style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 153);\"><p>Table A presents revised total nonfarm employment data on a seasonally adjust-<br \/>ed basis for January through December 2009. The revised data for April 2009<br \/>forward incorporate the effect of applying the rate of change measured by the<br \/>sample to the new benchmark level, as well as updated net business birth\/death<br \/>model adjustments and new seasonal adjustment factors. The November and<br \/>December 2009 revisions also reflect the routine incorporation of additional<br \/>sample receipts into the November final and December second preliminary<br \/>estimates. The total nonfarm employment level for March 2009 was revised down-<br \/>ward by 902,000 (930,000 on a seasonally adjusted basis), or 0.7 percent. The<br \/>previously published level for December 2009 was revised downward 1,390,000<br \/>(1,363,000 on a seasonally adjusted basis).<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>So they were off by over 1 million in December \u2026 Oopsie.<\/p>\n<p>You can see Bloomberg&#8217;s interactive page on the effects <a href=\"http:\/\/www.bloomberg.com\/insight\/birth-death-model.html\">here<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><sup>*<\/sup><span style=\"font-size:78%;\">Full disclosure, this set includes yours truly, who has been out of work for about 30\u00bd weeks.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Click for full size H\/t Calculated Risk Employment Population Ration, h\/t Calculated Risk Part time involuntarily, h\/t Calculated Risk Worst recession since WWII, h\/t Calculated Risk Temp hiring, which is a leading indicator, is improving, h\/t Calculated Risk Birth\/death model, h\/t Daily Reckoning Well, the good news is that the unemployment rate fell to 9.7%. &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[973,975,1089],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-189869","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-economy","category-employment","category-recession"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/189869"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=189869"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/189869\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=189869"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=189869"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=189869"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}