{"id":189901,"date":"2010-02-01T20:37:00","date_gmt":"2010-02-02T01:37:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/2010\/02\/01\/we-are-fed-10\/"},"modified":"2010-02-01T20:37:00","modified_gmt":"2010-02-02T01:37:00","slug":"we-are-fed-10","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/2010\/02\/01\/we-are-fed-10\/","title":{"rendered":"We Are F%$#ed"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>It appears that according to Robert Gibbs, Obama&#8217;s press secretary, <a href=\"http:\/\/theplumline.whorunsgov.com\/senate-republicans\/gibbs-dems-will-never-solve-our-problems-without-gop-help\/\">nothing can be done with the largest majorities in a generation<\/a>: <a href=\"http:\/\/theplumline.whorunsgov.com\/senate-republicans\/gibbs-dems-will-never-solve-our-problems-without-gop-help\/\"><\/a><\/p>\n<blockquote style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 153);\"><p>This is the emerging talking point from the White House and Congessional leadership: It is a mathematical impossiblity that Dems will ever be able to get anything done without cooperation from Republicans.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Ignoring the fate of supermajority requirements for ordinary business (see taxes, raising, budget, California, f%$#ed), the voters <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">hate<span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><\/span><\/span> weakness.<\/p>\n<p>They hate it even more <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">when you are the ones who are supposed to be in charge<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p>Why bother voting for a Democrat when they are unwilling to do anything, because the tiny minority in the corner is saying nasty things.<\/p>\n<p>Let me refer you, <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">once again<\/span> to Josh Marshall&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/talkingpointsmemo.com\/archives\/148765.php\">bitch slap theory of electoral politics<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 153);\"><p>Let&#8217;s call it the Republicans&#8217; Bitch-Slap theory of electoral politics.<\/p>\n<p>It goes something like this.<\/p>\n<p>On one level, of course, the aim behind these attacks is to cast suspicion upon Kerry&#8217;s military service record and label him a liar. But that&#8217;s only part of what&#8217;s going on.<\/p>\n<p>Consider for a moment what the big game is here. This is a battle between two candidates to demonstrate toughness on national security. Toughness is a unitary quality, really &#8212; a personal, characterological quality rather than one rooted in policy or divisible in any real way. So both sides are trying to prove to undecided voters either that they&#8217;re tougher than the other guy or at least tough enough for the job.<\/p>\n<p>In a post-9\/11 environment, obviously, this question of strength, toughness or resolve is particularly salient. That, of course, is why so much of this debate is about war and military service in the first place.<\/p>\n<p>One way &#8212; perhaps the best way &#8212; to demonstrate someone&#8217;s lack of toughness or strength is to attack them and show they are either unwilling or unable to defend themselves &#8212; thus the rough slang I used above. And that I think is a big part of what is happening here. Someone who can&#8217;t or won&#8217;t defend themselves certainly isn&#8217;t someone you can depend upon to defend you.<\/p>\n<p>Demonstrating Kerry&#8217;s unwillingness to defend himself (if Bush can do that) is a far more tangible sign of what he&#8217;s made of than wartime experiences of thirty years ago.<\/p>\n<p>Hitting someone and not having them hit back hurts the morale of that person&#8217;s supporters, buoys the confidence of your own backers (particularly if many tend toward an authoritarian mindset) and tends to make the person who&#8217;s receiving the hits into an object of contempt (even if also possibly also one of sympathy) in the eyes of the uncommitted.<\/p>\n<p>This is certainly what Bush&#8217;s father did to Michael Dukakis and, sadly, it is what Bush himself did, to a great degree, to Al Gore.<\/p>\n<p>In other ways, Bush&#8217;s bully-boy campaign tactics play to his strengths, albeit unstated and unlovely ones. Many of the polls of the president have shown that while people don&#8217;t necessarily agree with the specific policies he&#8217;s pursued abroad many also intuitively believe that there&#8217;s no one who will hit back harder. There&#8217;s some of that &#8216;he may be a son-of-a-bitch but he&#8217;s our son-of-a-bitch&#8217; quality to the president&#8217;s support on national security issues.<\/p>\n<p>This meta-message behind the president&#8217;s attacks on Kerry&#8217;s war record is more consequential than many believe. So hitting back hard was critical on many levels.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>All the silly little political orgasms over who stood and who didn&#8217;t at the SOTU speech, or how Barack Obama came off better in his t\u00eate-\u00e0-t\u00eate with Republicans <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">does not matter<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p>If you cannot be trusted to <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">fight<\/span> for yourself , you cannot be trusted to fight for us.<\/p>\n<p>Are these guys <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">trying<\/span> to lose both houses in 2010?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>It appears that according to Robert Gibbs, Obama&#8217;s press secretary, nothing can be done with the largest majorities in a generation: This is the emerging talking point from the White House and Congessional leadership: It is a mathematical impossiblity that Dems will ever be able to get anything done without cooperation from Republicans. Ignoring the &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1142,978,982,979,1173],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-189901","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-barack-obama","category-politics","category-stupid","category-wanker","category-white-house"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/189901"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=189901"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/189901\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=189901"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=189901"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=189901"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}