{"id":190082,"date":"2010-01-09T06:41:00","date_gmt":"2010-01-09T11:41:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/2010\/01\/09\/f-35-news-1-good-2-bad\/"},"modified":"2010-01-09T06:41:00","modified_gmt":"2010-01-09T11:41:00","slug":"f-35-news-1-good-2-bad","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/2010\/01\/09\/f-35-news-1-good-2-bad\/","title":{"rendered":"F-35 News, 1 Good, 2 Bad"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"border: 1px solid black; margin: 0px 10px; width: 400px; float: right; text-align: center;\">Click for full size<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/img705.imageshack.us\/img705\/9946\/f7b482f960a444a3a27ce13.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/img705.imageshack.us\/img705\/9946\/f7b482f960a444a3a27ce13.jpg\" bordercolor=\"white\" border=\"0\" width=\"390\" \/><\/a> <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Finally!<\/span><\/div>\n<p>On the good side, the F-35B, specifically air frame BF-01, has finally <a href=\"http:\/\/www.aviationweek.com\/aw\/blogs\/defense\/index.jsp?plckController=Blog&amp;plckScript=blogScript&amp;plckElementId=blogDest&amp;plckBlogPage=BlogViewPost&amp;plckPostId=Blog%3A27ec4a53-dcc8-42d0-bd3a-01329aef79a7Post%3A0e4e8d11-9542-4d8a-9cee-27960b139057\">engaged the lift fan in flight<\/a>, and everything was, as the flight test people say, &#8220;Nominal&#8221;:<\/p>\n<blockquote style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 153);\"><p>The Lockheed Martin F-35B Lightning II stealth fighter engages its short takeoff\/vertical landing propulsion system in flight for the first time, near Naval Air Station Patuxent River, Md., on Jan. 7. F-35 Lead STOVL Pilot Graham Tomlinson said afterward that the aircraft flew smoothly with the STOVL system engaged and was very easy to control.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>This is a good thing, though it is somewhat behind schedule, and Lockheed-Martin is thinks that it is necessary to <a href=\"http:\/\/www.bloomberg.com\/apps\/news?pid=20601103&amp;sid=asgKVyji461s\">add planes to the test program<\/a>, so as to reduce the test schedule slippage from 2 years (!) to 6 months:<\/p>\n<blockquote style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 153);\"><p>Lockheed Martin Corp. may add an aircraft-carrier model to a group of F-35 test planes as the company works to limit delays on the fighter jets to six months or less instead of the two-plus years expected by the Pentagon.     <\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>I&#8217;m not sure that this would help though, as Secretary of Defense Robert Gates has just ordered a delay in deliveries of the aircraft:<\/p>\n<blockquote style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 153);\"><p>Defense Secretary Robert Gates has ordered a delay in the Lockheed Martin Corp. F-35 program, cutting the Pentagon\u2019s planned purchases by 10 aircraft in fiscal 2011 and a total of 122 through 2015, according to a budget document.<\/p>\n<p>More than $2.8 billion that was budgeted earlier to buy the military\u2019s next-generation fighter would instead be used to continue its development.<\/p>\n<p>The delay is a setback for both Gates and Lockheed. <\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Setback is one way to put it.<\/p>\n<p>So is clusterf%$#, death-spiral, shambles, snafu, and many other words I&#8217;m not in the mood to look up right now.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Click for full size Finally! On the good side, the F-35B, specifically air frame BF-01, has finally engaged the lift fan in flight, and everything was, as the flight test people say, &#8220;Nominal&#8221;: The Lockheed Martin F-35B Lightning II stealth fighter engages its short takeoff\/vertical landing propulsion system in flight for the first time, near &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1007,1136,1008],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-190082","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-aviation","category-breaking-news","category-defense-procurement"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/190082"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=190082"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/190082\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=190082"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=190082"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=190082"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}