{"id":191241,"date":"2009-09-10T16:43:00","date_gmt":"2009-09-10T21:43:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/2009\/09\/10\/economics-update-153\/"},"modified":"2009-09-10T16:43:00","modified_gmt":"2009-09-10T21:43:00","slug":"economics-update-153","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/2009\/09\/10\/economics-update-153\/","title":{"rendered":"Economics Update"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"border: 1px solid black; margin: 0px 10px; float: right; text-align: center; width: 410px;\"><img decoding=\"async\" bordercolor=\"white\" src=\"http:\/\/img268.imageshack.us\/img268\/388\/weeklyclaimssep10058768.jpg\" border=\"0\" width=\"400\" \/> <span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Unemployment Chart Pr0n Courtesy <a href=\"http:\/\/www.calculatedriskblog.com\/2009\/09\/weekly-unemployment-claims-decline.html\">Calculated Risk<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n<p>Well, we have the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.workforcesecurity.doleta.gov\/press\/2009\/091009.asp\">initial unemployment claims out now<\/a> (government link), and it appears to point to improvement.  Initial claims were 550,000, a decrease of 26,000 from the revised figure of  576,000 (but the initial figure was 570,000, so the drop is 20K, not 26K apples to apples),   the 4 week moving average was 570,000, down from 572,250, and the continuing claims number(seasonally adjusted) was 6,088,000, down 159,000 from last week&#8217;s revised level of 6,247,000 (only continuing claims were revised up from 6.23m, so the apples to apples drop is actually 142K, not 159K).<\/p>\n<p>Anyone else knowing a pattern in revision numbers, or is it just me?<\/p>\n<p>BTW, note that the continuing claims number drops as people lose benefits or move to emergency unemployment claims.<\/p>\n<p>In any case, with <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cnbc.com\/id\/32766035\">foreclosures up 18% year over year<\/a>, and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.bloomberg.com\/apps\/news?pid=20601110&amp;sid=aOAsmE11dHeY\">poverty rate hitting an 11 year high<\/a>, 13.2%, things really don&#8217;t indicate a rapid improvement.<\/p>\n<p>The weekly claims number needs to be below 400K before we will start seeing increases in employment.<\/p>\n<p>Additionally, we have a leading indicator in Japan, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.bloomberg.com\/apps\/news?pid=newsarchive&amp;sid=aYD_XZb1LmuE\">machinery (capital) orders are in the toilet<\/a>, with orders being the lowest since the start of the survey in 1987.<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;d also stay out of the stock market, as <a href=\"http:\/\/money.cnn.com\/2009\/09\/10\/news\/economy\/insider.sales\/index.htm?section=money_topstories\">insiders selling continuing to go crazy<\/a>, and when people sell their own stocks it&#8217;s because they know something, even if this knowledge is not sufficient to trigger an criminal or civil investigation.<\/p>\n<p>In the world of central banking, the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.bloomberg.com\/apps\/news?pid=20601102&amp;sid=as7uNPsYmnu8\">Bank of England is leaving its benchmark unchanged, and continuing with bond purchases<\/a> (quantitative easing).<\/p>\n<p>Bonds did fairly well today, with the yields on <a href=\"http:\/\/www.bloomberg.com\/apps\/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=abgDmm1eIHGo\">mortgage backed bonds<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.bloomberg.com\/apps\/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aCn6v7LDKVjo\">US treasuries<\/a> prices rising, which means that the yields are falling\u2026\u2026\u2026Unless, of course, you are talking about <a href=\"http:\/\/www.bloomberg.com\/apps\/news?pid=20601110&amp;sid=avBAjJd7jvq8\">Polish government bonds<\/a>, which look to be heading into the world of hurt that their Baltic Republic neighbors are feeling.<\/p>\n<p>Meanwhile, a week inventory report has <a href=\"http:\/\/money.cnn.com\/2009\/09\/10\/markets\/oil\/\">pushed crude oil up<\/a>, and the <a href=\"http:\/\/money.cnn.com\/2009\/09\/10\/markets\/dollar.reut\/index.htm\">US dollar was up marginally<\/a>, though whether this is a turn, or just a breather, is unclear.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Unemployment Chart Pr0n Courtesy Calculated Risk Well, we have the initial unemployment claims out now (government link), and it appears to point to improvement. Initial claims were 550,000, a decrease of 26,000 from the revised figure of 576,000 (but the initial figure was 570,000, so the drop is 20K, not 26K apples to apples), the &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[973,975,1004,1188,1140,1088,1089,985],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-191241","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-economy","category-employment","category-finance","category-japan","category-poverty","category-real-estate","category-recession","category-regulation"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/191241"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=191241"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/191241\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=191241"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=191241"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=191241"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}