{"id":191928,"date":"2009-06-05T17:44:00","date_gmt":"2009-06-05T22:44:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/2009\/06\/05\/economics-update-205\/"},"modified":"2009-06-05T17:44:00","modified_gmt":"2009-06-05T22:44:00","slug":"economics-update-205","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/2009\/06\/05\/economics-update-205\/","title":{"rendered":"Economics Update"},"content":{"rendered":"<div style=\"border: 1px solid black; margin: 0px 10px; width: 410px; float: right; text-align: center;\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/img142.imageshack.us\/img142\/5708\/unemploymentstressmay13.jpg\" bordercolor=\"white\" border=\"0\" width=\"400\" \/><br \/><span style=\"font-style: italic;\">Unemployment Rates, Actuals vs. Geithner&#8217;s &#8220;Stress Tests&#8221;, courtesy <a href=\"http:\/\/www.calculatedriskblog.com\/2009\/06\/unemployment-compared-to-stress-test.html\">Calculated Risk<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n<p>Today, we get the unemployment rate (U3).  It<a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2009\/06\/06\/business\/economy\/06jobs.html?_r=1&amp;hp\"> rose from 8.9% to 9.4%<\/a>, a \u00bd% rise.<\/p>\n<p>Ouch.<\/p>\n<p>By way of context, you can look at the BLS <a href=\"http:\/\/www.bls.gov\/news.release\/empsit.t12.htm\">alternate measures table<\/a>, and U6, which is probably closest to the figures used during the depression, though it still under counts relative to the older metric, rose from 15.8% to 16.4%.<\/p>\n<p>Ugly number.<\/p>\n<p>Of course, the press is reporting that <a href=\"http:\/\/money.cnn.com\/2009\/06\/05\/news\/economy\/jobs_may\/index.htm\">the decrease in non-farm payrolls was less than expected<\/a>, -345,000 as opposed to their projection of something in the -500K range.<\/p>\n<p>Additionally, part of the increase in unemployment is <a href=\"http:\/\/www.bloomberg.com\/apps\/news?pid=20601110&amp;sid=ap0Qp8qaW85k\">workers becoming undiscouraged and actively looking for work<\/a>, though the U6 number indicates that there was still an upward revision despite that.<\/p>\n<p>Still, it appears that bondholders are betting on a recovery, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.bloomberg.com\/apps\/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=ayhYxScd1QNE\">they are bidding up the rates on treasuries<\/a>, which is also <a href=\"http:\/\/www.calculatedriskblog.com\/2009\/06\/record-high-yield-curve-rising-mortgage.html\">driving up mortgage rates<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>There is an argument between economists as to whether this is inflation concerns, or whether people have simply stopped fleeing headlong to the safety of US Government securities.<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;m with the latter school, but you can decide for yourselves.<\/p>\n<p>As to where the economy is headed, I&#8217;d bet with the insiders and banks and such, and<br \/><a href=\"http:\/\/pragcap.com\/despite-green-shoots-insider-selling-picks-up\">insider sales as reported to the SEC are going up<\/a>, implying that they are expecting worse for their firms.<\/p>\n<p>Still, the jobs report drove both <a href=\"http:\/\/money.cnn.com\/2009\/06\/05\/markets\/dollar.reut\/index.htm\">the dollar<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/money.cnn.com\/2009\/06\/05\/markets\/oil\/\">oil<\/a> up today.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Unemployment Rates, Actuals vs. Geithner&#8217;s &#8220;Stress Tests&#8221;, courtesy Calculated Risk Today, we get the unemployment rate (U3). It rose from 8.9% to 9.4%, a \u00bd% rise. Ouch. By way of context, you can look at the BLS alternate measures table, and U6, which is probably closest to the figures used during the depression, though it &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1080,973,975,1135,1004,1088,1089],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-191928","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-currency","category-economy","category-employment","category-energy","category-finance","category-real-estate","category-recession"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/191928"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=191928"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/191928\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=191928"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=191928"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=191928"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}