{"id":195989,"date":"2008-05-31T09:01:00","date_gmt":"2008-05-31T14:01:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/2008\/05\/31\/brazil-also-lodges-ooxml-complaint\/"},"modified":"2008-05-31T09:01:00","modified_gmt":"2008-05-31T14:01:00","slug":"brazil-also-lodges-ooxml-complaint","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/2008\/05\/31\/brazil-also-lodges-ooxml-complaint\/","title":{"rendered":"Brazil Also Lodges OOXML Complaint"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I think that the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.theregister.co.uk\/2008\/05\/30\/brazil_appeals_against_oomxl\/\">Bum&#8217;s rush on OOXML pushed by the US and Microflaccid may end up backfiring<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 102);\"><p>Now Brazil has become the latest country to put the boot in by objecting to what it claimed was a flawed BRM that saw processes rushed through in favour of Microsoft gaining approval for its document format.<\/p>\n<p>&#8230;.<\/p>\n<p>Marcia Cristina de Oliveira, manager of the standardisation process at the ABNT claims in a letter to the ISO (a copy of which is provided by Andy Updegrove here) that \u201cthe Brazilian delegation was not allowed to present an important proposal regarding the legacy binary mapping.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cBrazil had tried to present this proposal, during the debates, on the first day of the meeting&#8230; On Friday, when USA ended their part of presentation and asked for Brazil to present its part of it, the convenor denied this opportunity to Brazilian delegation.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>According to Updegrove, that\u2019s quite a serious allegation. \u201cWhile this latest appeal overlaps the South African objections in part, it also raises new concerns, some of which are particular to the interests of Brazil, rather than applying to the process as a whole. &#8220;As a result, it raises not only additional issues, but also ones that present a categorically different basis for appeal as well,\u201d he said.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Interestingly enough, OOXML is already out of compliance, as the standard, DIS 29500, is supposed to be published no more than one month after approval.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I think that the Bum&#8217;s rush on OOXML pushed by the US and Microflaccid may end up backfiring: Now Brazil has become the latest country to put the boot in by objecting to what it claimed was a flawed BRM that saw processes rushed through in favour of Microsoft gaining approval for its document format. &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[985,989,1025],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-195989","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-regulation","category-software","category-technology"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/195989"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=195989"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/195989\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=195989"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=195989"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=195989"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}