{"id":198259,"date":"2007-11-25T23:42:00","date_gmt":"2007-11-26T04:42:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/2007\/11\/25\/courts-allowing-electronic-of-suspects-without-probable-cause\/"},"modified":"2007-11-25T23:42:00","modified_gmt":"2007-11-26T04:42:00","slug":"courts-allowing-electronic-of-suspects-without-probable-cause","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/2007\/11\/25\/courts-allowing-electronic-of-suspects-without-probable-cause\/","title":{"rendered":"Courts Allowing Electronic of Suspects Without Probable Cause"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/content\/article\/2007\/11\/22\/AR2007112201444.html\">Welcome to 1984, only 23 years late<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>The feds are increasingly using the enhanced 911 services to track people&#8217;s movements, and most of the judicial precedent at this point is saying that they do <span style=\"font-weight: bold;\">not<\/span> need probable cause to get a court order, it is noted that, &#8220;Such requests run counter to the Justice Department&#8217;s internal recommendation that federal prosecutors seek warrants based on probable cause to obtain precise location data in private areas&#8221;, so we get<\/p>\n<blockquote style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 153);\"><p>In one case last month in a southwestern state, an FBI agent obtained precise location data with a court order based on the lower standard, citing &#8220;specific and articulable facts&#8221; showing reasonable grounds to believe the data are &#8220;relevant to an ongoing criminal investigation,&#8221; said Al Gidari, a partner at Perkins Coie in Seattle, who reviews data requests for carriers.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Which means that the agents think that all they need to show is that they want the information.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Welcome to 1984, only 23 years late. The feds are increasingly using the enhanced 911 services to track people&#8217;s movements, and most of the judicial precedent at this point is saying that they do not need probable cause to get a court order, it is noted that, &#8220;Such requests run counter to the Justice Department&#8217;s &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[971,972,1081],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-198259","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-civil-rights","category-justice","category-laws"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/198259"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=198259"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/198259\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=198259"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=198259"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=198259"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}