Figure 1: \u201cTo ensure the penetration of the ICBM force, the Soviet ABM system would be attacked first. Minuteman E and F and Polaris missiles would first hit the Hen House early warning radars, and their Tallin system defenses [SA-5 SAM, ed.]. Then the Dog House radar and the Triad system around Moscow would be attacked. More than 100 Minuteman would be involved in the ABM suppression.\u201d <\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n Here is his money quote:<\/p>\n All of this happened during the Cold War and many things have changed, but the basic motivation for targeting a limited missile defense system then was the same as today: The Soviet ABM system was entirely defensive and couldn\u2019t threaten anyone (to paraphrase a characterization frequently use by U.S. and NATO officials to justify their missile defense plans today), but it could disturb the main ICBM attack on Moscow and military facilities downrange. That made it a top-priority target. And even though U.S. planners suspected that the system was not very efficient, they committed about 10 percent of the entire ICBM force to destroy it. To the extent the Russia ABM is operational, U.S. nuclear strike plans probably still target it today.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n All in all, an excellent read, and it reinforces my believe that the US system IS<\/span> to a large extent towards the Russians.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Along with good information on the Russian systems, and the US Posture in the Cold war, and this provides insight into why the Russians believe that this is targeted at them. This US document might provide some insight: Figure 1:The US 1968 Nuclear ABM Strike Plan \u201cTo ensure the penetration of the ICBM force, the …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[964,1096],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-199519","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-foreign-relations","category-missile-defense"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/199519"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=199519"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/199519\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=199519"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=199519"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=199519"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
The US 1968 Nuclear ABM Strike Plan<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n ![](\"http:\/\/img167.imageshack.us\/img167\/8075\/abmtxtsp4.jpg\")
<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n\n \n
Source: U.S. Strategic Air Command, History of U.S. Strategic Air Command January-June 1968<\/i>, February 1969, p. 300. Excerpts (pp. 300-306) available here<\/a> (pdf, 0.8 MB).<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n