{"id":199891,"date":"2007-06-20T06:11:00","date_gmt":"2007-06-20T11:11:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/2007\/06\/20\/non-nato-tactical-data-link-developed\/"},"modified":"2007-06-20T06:11:00","modified_gmt":"2007-06-20T11:11:00","slug":"non-nato-tactical-data-link-developed","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/2007\/06\/20\/non-nato-tactical-data-link-developed\/","title":{"rendered":"Non-NATO Tactical Data Link Developed"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Thales can&#8217;t be the only people offering this sort of capability.<\/p>\n<p>I imagine that the British or Germans have something similar, and that there was a similar system that dates back to the USSR.<\/p>\n<blockquote style=\"color: rgb(0, 0, 153);\"><p><span style=\"font-size:130%;\"><a style=\"font-weight: bold;\" href=\"http:\/\/www.aviationnow.com\/publication\/awst\/loggedin\/AvnowStoryDisplay.do?fromChannel=awst&amp;pubKey=awst&amp;issueDate=2007-06-18&amp;story=xml\/awst_xml\/2007\/06\/18\/AW_06_18_2007_p112-02.xml&amp;headline=Thales+Develops+LX16+Tactical+Data+Link+for+Non-NATO+Countries\">Thales Develops LX16 Tactical Data Link for Non-NATO Countries<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n<p>Aviation Week &#038; Space Technology<br \/>06\/18\/2007, page 114<\/p>\n<p>Joris Janssen Lok<br \/>Paris<\/p>\n<p>Link 16-equivalent data link gives nations option for tactical network<\/p>\n<p>Printed headline: Non-NATO Network<\/p>\n<p>Thales is proposing a tactical data link that gives nations not currently allowed to use the NATO-standard Link 16 the option to acquire a similar capability, which Thales calls LX16.<\/p>\n<p>At least one Asian country is in negotiations to equip all of its armed forces (air, land and maritime) with LX16, say company sources, while declining to identify the customer.<\/p>\n<p>Thales is also receiving &#8220;strong interest&#8221; in LX16 from several other nations as well as from &#8220;aircraft manufacturers who are not in NATO countries and who sell outside NATO.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Non-NATO air customers often love to get a Link 16 capability, but they can&#8217;t&#8211;so we developed an equivalent tactical data link that uses the same message set, grammar and vocabulary,&#8221; says Patrice Caine, vice president for communications, navigation and identification activities in Thales Land &amp; Joint Systems.<\/p>\n<p>Once installed, the equipment behind LX16 can be modified &#8220;virtually overnight&#8221; to support Link 16 proper, Caine suggests. Such an upgrade could be considered if an LX16 user becomes eligible to join the Link 16 user community&#8211;for example, when there&#8217;s a need to participate in Link 16 networks during coalition operations.<\/p>\n<p>The change from an LX16 to a Link 16 configuration can be achieved by adding a MIDS-LVT (Multifunctional Information Distribution System-Low Volume Terminal) to each aircraft, ship or land asset that needs to participate in the Link 16 network.<\/p>\n<p>Thales is also working to make LX16 interoperable with Link 16 without having to add MIDS-LVT terminals to all platforms. That would be a gateway system that allows the LX16 network to interface with Link 16.<\/p>\n<p>&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>While Link 16 operates in the 960-1215-MHz. frequency range (L-band), Thales&#8217;s LX16 operates at 300-600 MHz.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>The lower frequency implies that there would be lower throughput, but I&#8217;m not up on radio Frequency stuff, so I&#8217;m not sure how much.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Thales can&#8217;t be the only people offering this sort of capability. I imagine that the British or Germans have something similar, and that there was a similar system that dates back to the USSR. Thales Develops LX16 Tactical Data Link for Non-NATO Countries Aviation Week &#038; Space Technology06\/18\/2007, page 114 Joris Janssen LokParis Link 16-equivalent &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1067,1006,1025],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-199891","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-communications","category-military","category-technology"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/199891"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=199891"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/199891\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=199891"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=199891"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=199891"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}