{"id":200143,"date":"2021-06-28T18:23:00","date_gmt":"2021-06-28T23:23:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/2021\/06\/28\/boeing-still-cannot-make-aircraft\/"},"modified":"2021-06-28T18:23:00","modified_gmt":"2021-06-28T23:23:00","slug":"boeing-still-cannot-make-aircraft","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/2021\/06\/28\/boeing-still-cannot-make-aircraft\/","title":{"rendered":"Boeing Still Cannot Make Aircraft"},"content":{"rendered":"

The FAA has announced that it is delaying certification of their new 777X variant because of design maturity and potentially disastrous problems with its control systems<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Everyone employed at Boeing’s Chicago headquarters beyond the janitors and secretaries need to be fired \u2026\u2026\u2026 and into the sun:<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

In yet another blow to Boeing, the Federal Aviation Administration last month formally denied the jet maker permission to move forward with a key step in certifying its forthcoming giant widebody airplane, the 777X.<\/p>\n

In a sternly worded letter dated May 13, which was reviewed by The Seattle Times, the FAA warned Boeing it may have to increase the number of test flights planned and that certification realistically is now more than two years out, probably in late 2023.<\/p>\n

That could push the jet\u2019s entry into commercial service into early 2024, four years later than originally planned.<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Clearly, someone at Boeing decided to, “Take off their engineer hat and put your management hat on,” with predictable results.*<\/sup><\/p>\n

Boeing is suffering death by MBA.<\/p>\n

\n

\u2026\u2026\u2026<\/span><\/p>\n

The FAA cited a long litany of concerns, including a serious flight control incident during a test flight on Dec. 8, 2020, when the plane experienced an \u201cuncommanded pitch event\u201d \u2014 meaning the nose of the aircraft pitched abruptly up or down without input from the pilots.<\/p>\n

Boeing has yet to satisfy the FAA that it has fully understood and corrected what went wrong that day.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

After all the troubles with the 737 MAX, you think that they would have that one at the top of their, “To Do” list, but in their rush to meet schedule, and to move production to a non-union facility, they screwed the pooch AGAIN<\/b>.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\u201cThe aircraft is not yet ready,\u201d [local FAA manager Ian]<\/span> Won wrote. \u201cThe technical data required for type certification has not reached a point where it appears the aircraft type design is mature and can be expected to meet the applicable regulations.\u201d<\/p>\n

An FAA official, who asked not to be identified in order to speak freely, said the drag on 777X certification is now \u201cthe subject of a lot of attention\u201d at high levels both within the agency and at Boeing.<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

The FAA got burnt by Boeing with the 737MAX, and they are now dubious of Boeing’s claims.<\/p>\n

The reputational damage to the Seattle aircraft manufacturer from its rampant managerialism is ongoing and an existential threat to its continued viability as a going concern.<\/p>\n

*<\/sup>This is a paraphrase of a comment made to Thikol engineer Roger Boisjoly<\/a> by an unnamed manager when he warned of the danger of launching the Space Shuttle Challenger in very low temperatures.\u2020<\/sup><\/span><\/p>\n

\u2020<\/sup>For those who don’t know your history, the o-rings in the solid booster failed, and the Challenger blew up.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The FAA has announced that it is delaying certification of their new 777X variant because of design maturity and potentially disastrous problems with its control systems. Everyone employed at Boeing’s Chicago headquarters beyond the janitors and secretaries need to be fired \u2026\u2026\u2026 and into the sun: In yet another blow to Boeing, the Federal Aviation …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1007,1005,987,1221,985],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-200143","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-aviation","category-business","category-fail","category-manufacturing","category-regulation"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/200143"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=200143"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/200143\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=200143"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=200143"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=200143"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}