{"id":200280,"date":"2021-05-22T18:19:00","date_gmt":"2021-05-22T23:19:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/2021\/05\/22\/why-cap-and-trade-sucks-3\/"},"modified":"2021-05-22T18:19:00","modified_gmt":"2021-05-22T23:19:00","slug":"why-cap-and-trade-sucks-3","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/2021\/05\/22\/why-cap-and-trade-sucks-3\/","title":{"rendered":"Why Cap and Trade Sucks"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>  At the core of Cap and Trade carbon controls is trading of tax credits, and   the creation and trading of tax credits is a function which actively   encourages fraudulent behavior.&nbsp; <\/p>\n<p>  Case in point is the Massachusetts Audubon Society, which   <a href=\"https:\/\/www.propublica.org\/article\/a-nonprofit-promised-to-preserve-wildlife-then-it-made-millions-claiming-it-could-cut-down-trees\">announced its intention to log thousands of acres that it was preserving in     western Massachusetts so that it could then sell credits for not chopping     down the trees<\/a>. <\/p>\n<p>  Of course, it never actually intended to chop down these cheese, this was just   a way to create carbon credits that had no basis in reality, and then sell   them to polluting business, with no actual reduction in emissions. <\/p>\n<p>  In addition to the Mass Audubon Society, the   <a href=\"https:\/\/www.bloomberg.com\/features\/2020-nature-conservancy-carbon-offsets-trees\/\">Nature Conservancy<\/a>  is notorious for its sale of meaningless carbon offsets: <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>  <span style=\"color: #2b00fe;\">The Massachusetts Audubon Society has long managed its land in western     Massachusetts as crucial wildlife habitat. Nature lovers flock to these     forests to enjoy bird-watching and quiet hikes, with the occasional bobcat     or moose sighting.<\/p>\n<p>But in 2015, the conservation nonprofit     presented California\u2019s top climate regulator with a startling scenario: It     could heavily log 9,700 acres of its preserved forests over the next few     years.<\/p>\n<p>The group raised the possibility of chopping down hundreds     of thousands of trees as part of its application to take part in     California\u2019s forest offset program.<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Spoiler, the never intended to log this land.&nbsp; They are engaging in a humbug. <\/p>\n<p>The environmental organization has become a bunch of snollygosters.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p><span style=\"color: #2b00fe;\">\u2026\u2026\u2026<\/span><\/p>\n<p>    <span style=\"color: #2b00fe;\">The Air Resources Board accepted Mass Audubon\u2019s project into its program,       requiring the nonprofit to preserve its forests over the next century       instead of heavily logging them. The nonprofit received more than 600,000       credits in exchange for its promise. The vast majority were sold through       intermediaries to oil and gas companies, records show. The group earned       about $6 million from the sales, Mass Audubon regional scientist Tom       Lautzenheiser said.<\/p>\n<p>On paper, the deal was a success. The       fossil fuel companies were able to emit more CO2 while abiding by       California\u2019s climate laws. Mass Audubon earned enough money to acquire       additional land for preservation, and to hire new staff working on climate       change.<\/p>\n<p>But it didn\u2019t work out as well for the climate, unless       Mass Audubon actually intended to start acting more like a timber company.       The project wouldn\u2019t achieve anywhere near the claimed levels of reduced       carbon emissions if the nonprofit was getting credits for forests that       were never in danger of aggressive logging. And every time a polluter uses       a credit that didn\u2019t actually save a ton of carbon, net emissions go up,       undermining the point of the program.<\/p>\n<p>\u2026\u2026\u2026<\/p>\n<p>New       research by the San Francisco nonprofit CarbonPlan provides evidence that       this is occurring: It shows that landowners in the program routinely       maximize the number of trees they assert they could chop down if they       weren\u2019t given carbon credits, even if they have little history of logging       or have mission statements in sharp opposition to such practices.<\/p>\n<p>The       research suggests the program could be significantly exaggerating the       amount of carbon savings achieved.<\/p>\n<p>\u201c<b><span style=\"font-size: 100%; font-variant: small-caps;\">The nearly universal pattern we see in the data<\/span><\/b>,\u201d said Danny Cullenward, policy director at       CarbonPlan and a coauthor of the study, corroborates concerns that \u201c<b><span style=\"font-size: 100%; font-variant: small-caps;\">those projects are not delivering real climate benefits<\/span><\/b>.\u201d<br \/><\/span>  <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>(<i>emphasis mine<\/i>)<\/p>\n<p>If you have direct tax on carbon, you eliminate this sort of fraud, what&#8217;s more you can treat the carbon tax in the same way that a value added tax is, and refund upon export, and charge upon import, so as to make sure that bad actors on global warming don&#8217;t get an effective subsidy for that bad behavior. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>At the core of Cap and Trade carbon controls is trading of tax credits, and the creation and trading of tax credits is a function which actively encourages fraudulent behavior.&nbsp; Case in point is the Massachusetts Audubon Society, which announced its intention to log thousands of acres that it was preserving in western Massachusetts so &hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1054,1056,970,987,1278],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-200280","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-anthropogenic-climate-change","category-charity","category-corruption","category-fail","category-fraud"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/200280"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=200280"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/200280\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=200280"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=200280"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.panix.com\/~msaroff\/40years\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=200280"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}